Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Valuable 4   News 3   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 8/18/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (36 comments)

Abolish the Senate, Starting with Some Whittling

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (176 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com


image adapted from wikipedia image

Seeing the way a handful of senators are serving their health industry contributors better than they are their constituents, or the health of the nation, it is clear the US Senate itself needs some major surgery.

The United States has the world's oldest living democracy. It is a problem. We are stuck with a house of Congress that utterly fails to fairly represent the people, giving disgracefully disproportionate power to a handful of people.

I realize it is nigh on to impossible to get rid of the Senate but someone should be talking about what a worthless body, or worse, the negative impact it has on democracy, freedom and justice.

We need some kind of replacement that is more representative, more responsive to changes-- where the people elected are replaced far more often. At the recent netroots nation conference a number of activists basically said they'd given up on influencing the Senate because they couldn't see a way to reach these granite icons, installed for six long years, massively protected with incumbency and the backing of their parties.

Elected officials should never be allowed to become such monolithic entities, unaccountable to their constituents.


It's time to eliminate the senate, to update the constitution. This will not ride well in the smaller states. They will fight it. Perhaps it is totally impossible. One way to address it is to make it an issue, so every member of the Senate has to take a stand on it. Another way to address it is to change the term length for senators. Make it the same as for members of the house. At least that will make the senators more accountable.

Another way to increase senator accountability is to remove all private campaign financing. We need to do this asap. If we can't eliminate an archaic, undemocratic institution we can at least make it more democratic. Unfortunately, we have almost 100 self-interested officials who will do all they can to protect their power. I'd love to hear from any senator or his staffer with any inclinations towards correcting the problems I address.

After all, what I'm doing is suggesting that 100 jobs be eliminated, probably replaced with a more parliamentary approach which would create even more jobs, but with a bit less job security. And my fallback position absolutely calls for an intentional decrease in job security. Matter of fact, there should be mandatory senate term limits. Cut the terms in half and allow a maximum of three terms of three years each.

America needs representatives who are responsive to their constituents. We don't have that any more in the senate and we need to get it back. Firedoglake is polling legislators, on video, to see where they stand on the public option. We should do the same on the future of the Senate. Which senators would be willing to let go of some of their security for the good of all American constituents?

We can't dismantle the Senate any time soon. But we can start whittling away the worst aspects of the Senate by calling for shorter terms and term limits. We can pull corporate and party funding out of the equation and require races to be run strictly using public funding.

America deserves a lot better than the out of date, doddering, unrepresentative system we currently have and, while it is probably impossible to replace it, we can do some clear things to make it better than it currently is. America deserves better.

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
36 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

To abolish the Senate or rewrite the Constitution... by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:40:23 AM
Let's revamp the Judicial Branch by Steven G. Erickson on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:38:28 PM
Additional Observations by Scott Baker on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:11:02 AM
many faults with proposals by liberalsrock on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:01:09 AM
like I said by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:10:36 AM
I've been screaming campaign reform by Janiece Senn on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:21:13 PM
I couldn't agree more! by William Cormier on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:21:45 AM
You nailed it, William! by Jay Farrington on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:31:55 PM
We need to join ranks on this issue. by Janiece Senn on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:41:07 PM
I agree by Robert N Smith on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:04:25 AM
This is a by sommers on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:14:27 AM
throwing the baby by J. Edward Tremlett on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:20:34 PM
More Representative. by steve scheetz on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:00:56 PM
The majority of the country? by William Cormier on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:54:46 PM
responsive to change by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:08:15 PM
Agreed by steve scheetz on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:28:10 PM
Additional Observations by Scott Baker on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:21:59 AM
Agreed by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:05:24 AM
You are wrong to speak lies about the majority. by Janiece Senn on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:49:35 PM
ROTFLMAO! by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:04:01 PM
It is too late..... by Paul Kruger on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:38:06 PM
...the ignorance of the voters... by Jill Herendeen on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:20:49 AM
MY TWO CENTS by Blaine Kinsey on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:56:39 PM
CORRECTION OF COMMENT by Blaine Kinsey on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:59:49 PM
Article V Convention by Harold Hellickson on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:58:48 PM
Good article! by Bryan Emmel on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:06:54 PM
There is a GREAT DEAL of old-fashioned by GL Rowsey on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:45:57 PM
HOWEVER by Blaine Kinsey on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:33:31 PM
But Blaine, by GL Rowsey on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:13:45 PM
That is to say, Blaine, by GL Rowsey on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:24:56 PM
HOWEVER by Blaine Kinsey on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:51:39 PM
Start with being able to better challenge chairmanships by Richard Lee on Tuesday, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:20:26 PM
"Let There Be Two, Three, Many.... by GL Rowsey on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:19:08 AM
... by john de herrera on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:45:01 PM
Article V: by GL Rowsey on Friday, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:51:53 PM
Senate is ANTI-democratic by Brian P. Mallon on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:40:56 PM