Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 8 (10 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   27 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Aaron Was a Criminal and So Are You

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 16   Well Said 10   Valuable 10  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 1/20/13

Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

The prosecution of Aaron Swartz and his subsequent suicide is heartbreaking. Aaron's life and work was an inspiring example of how the Internet can elevate humanity beyond the dregs of rote commerce and cheap thrills. Aaron's contributions to our society were not the shiny widgets of tech icons like Steve Jobs. Rather, they were ideas and technologies that enriched lives and empowered ordinary people. RSS, Reddit, and Creative Commons are all projects in which Aaron was a key participant; they are also free for anyone to use and represent the essence of the free (as in freedom) Internet movement.

Aaron Swarz

It was these very ideas that were the cause of Aaron's prosecution. The DOJ wanted to make an example of him precisely because he was effective at expressing and propagating his dissenting views against the corporate control of our lives. If Aaron's fans, mourners, and supporters fail to see that what happened to him was not a fluke event, but instead was de rigueur, Aaron's death will be all the more tragic.

Make no mistake, Aaron was a criminal and, despite popular belief, there was no prosecutorial overreach. The US Attorney who oversaw his prosecution described her office's actions as "appropriate" and, according to the law, she was telling the truth. The job of prosecutors is to bully and intimidate suspects, using the threat of some of the world's harshest sentencing laws into plea bargaining for a shorter sentence in exchange for an admission of guilt. This is American "justice;" our current system of severe sentencing and mandatory minimums gives prosecutors overwhelming power - power that was once in the hands of judges and juries - to the point that today less than 5% of criminal cases are resolved by a jury (3% in federal cases).

Prosecutorial discretion is not a mandate for prosecutors to apply fairness or common decency; it is simply the heuristic that determines who gets exposed to the system. There are no real restraints on our government's ability to prosecute and jail. We have enough laws on the books and prosecutors and judges have enough discretion interpreting them, that anyone can be locked up for any reason or no reason. Take, for example, the case of Tarek Mehanna who, after refusing to become an FBI informant, was arrested, held for years in solitary confinement, and ultimately convicted as a "terrorist." The substance of his crimes: sharing YouTube videos, and translating texts that were freely available on the Internet. Or look to Tim DeChrisopher or the Central Park Five; the list is unending and the point is clear: if prosecutors want to put you in jail, they can. It is also clear that there is no limit on our country's ability to incarcerate. The USA runs the largest penal system in world (our only competition in world history is the GULAG system of the USSR).

Thus, we are all criminals in waiting - a fact that is dramatic in the world of "cyber-crime," where a typical Internet user is potentially liable for millions of dollars per day in copyright violations. The question then becomes, who is chosen for prosecution and why? If the feds just randomly prosecuted typical Internet users for violating "terms of service" agreements, which is what Aaron did, the popular backlash would be too great. So instead, they pick their targets carefully.

Minorities, the poor, and unpopular political factions are the traditional targets for prosecution and incarceration. If you are black and live in New York City, it is routine to be stopped by police and arrested for simply walking down the street in your neighborhood or even in the hallway of your own building. If you are Muslim, even a kindergartener, you are a threat and are subject to arbitrary police surveillance. If you are an animal rights activist, you are considered a "terrorist" even if you're explicitly committed to non-violence. Conversely, if you are a rich, white banker, you can participate in the most egregious activity and never be jailed or even have to admit wrongdoing.

Internet freedom hacktivists have recently joined the ranks of Muslims, African Americans, the poor, and "eco-terrorists" as an acceptable target for the brutish American penal system. People like Aaron Swartz, Jeremy Hammond, Bradley Manning, and Andrew Auernheimer are increasingly being treated in the same way as people like Fred Hampton, Tarek Mehanna, and the SHAC Seven. This is happening because the corporate state has recognized that they possess democratic power and are a legitimate threat to the aims of the elite -- remember Aaron Swartz was the crucial organizer in the successful fight against SOPA.

If we don't want to see more people like Aaron martyred by our system, it is not enough to simply amend one (terrible) hacking law; the corporate state and its DOJ henchmen will just come back with another law. We have to recognize that Aaron was not alone. He is part of a long history of activists who've become too effective for the government to stand. In order to make a lasting change in this manifestly unjust "justice" system, we need to express the same outrage and dedicate the same time and resources toward abolishing all injustice that is done in our name. Reforming the incredibly broad Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) is a start, but it cannot be the goal. Abolishing the CFAA, mandatory minimums, the drug war, and the war on "terror" with the aim of dismantling the military and prison-industrial complex is necessary. We must remove corporate influence and replacing it with democratic (not Democratic) control of government, the Internet, and other institutions. We need to incorporate long term goals into our short term campaigns. This is exactly what Aaron did so effectively with his short life; let's honor his legacy by picking up the pace.

_________

*Demand justice for Aaron: Support "Aaron's Law" and inquiry into his prosecution - Link

 

Abi is Mass Defense Coordinator with the National Lawyers Guild's (NLG.org) national office. He has a J.D. from NYU School of Law and an extensive background in labor, political, and community organizing. He helped start the NLG NYC's Muslim Defense Project as well as the NLG's hactivist legal support network anonlg ( anonlg.org ).


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Aaron Was a Criminal and So Are You

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 people are discussing this page, with 27 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The prosecutors in this case are like the school y... by Rudy Avizius on Sunday, Jan 20, 2013 at 4:22:52 PM
Petition the Obama administration to: Remove Unite... by Iskender El-Rusi on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:29:12 AM
Every single Authoritarian abuse must be countered... by Paul Repstock on Sunday, Jan 20, 2013 at 4:57:00 PM
Nothing better describes the failure of humanity t... by Paul Repstock on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:29:20 AM
a wake up call for everyone who cares about justic... by Archie on Sunday, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:30:32 PM
for the charges leveled against Swartz by the pers... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Sunday, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:02:48 PM
the author doesn't want to debate this.  How ... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:09:33 PM
Aaron was a criminal if one accepts the laws which... by COMMONSENSEFOR COMMONGOOD.COM on Sunday, Jan 20, 2013 at 8:32:01 PM
jury might agree with St. Thomas Aquinas is most l... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Sunday, Jan 20, 2013 at 8:41:49 PM
Prosecutors almost never want a trial. The use th... by Samson on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 3:42:52 AM
That the system today is twisted. But I don't thi... by BFalcon on Sunday, Jan 20, 2013 at 9:31:36 PM
according to their crimes. However, how likely is ... by Paul Repstock on Sunday, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:31:24 PM
when plea bargaining was first allowed since 2 cla... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:01:32 AM
YOU are a criminal. If a prosecutor wants to, then... by Rob Kall on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:26:36 AM
You can't change the party platform unless you sto... by Ned Lud on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:58:05 AM
The state has the power to put whoever it wants in... by Abi Hassen on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:03:55 AM
since the author spouted that the prosecution was ... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:43:18 AM
So very true!!!... by Jack Swint on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:20:56 PM
This "member of the masses" hasn't ever been foole... by Robert von Tobel on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:02:41 AM
It is true that Aaron Swartz is not unique. We are... by Skyler Trombly on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:57:11 AM
>>"To get probation a friend worked for the ... by Paul Repstock on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:04:40 AM
I used to talk to an owner of a Southington, Conne... by Skyler Trombly on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:15:00 PM
I am a big fan of Sci-fi, of the genre; "if this g... by Susan Lee Schwartz on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:09:13 AM
The point of prosecutorial power is well establish... by Keith Brilhart on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:14:12 AM
Thank you!!! You said what most people only think,... by Jack Swint on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:19:01 PM
that you would see on Infowars as it simply says f... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:17:37 AM
>>" A Dawson College computer science stude... by Paul Repstock on Monday, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:53:42 PM