Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

A RACKETEERNG INFLUENCED CORRUPT ORGANIZATION FRONTED BY A CHURCH IS SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION UNDER (RICO)

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (10 fans)

As a lawyer, years ago I attempted to legally define religion. To my surprise I learned that because of the Separation clause of the First Amendment, courts in the United States have refused to legally define religion. Therefore there is no legal definition of religion.

Thus the separation clause which states that " Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" is itself under constitutional law too vague to be enforceable.

Subsequently, Federal and state courts adopted the separation clause as a restriction upon their review of issues which may be tainted with claims of "Religion". As a result, injuries have been judicially allowed to be inflicted upon citizens of the United States with no recourse or recompense at law or in equity.

The only way to define religion is by the elimination of certain activities generally considered to be non-religious in nature. In that regard, activities of business, crime or politics reduces a claim of "religion" or "religious" activity to such things as worship (with no definition), prayer (beseeching an indefinable Deity), Mass ("religious" gathering), doing good works, living a "religious" life, administering "religious" thought practice and its exercise.

Any activities clearly outside the scope of those indefinable activities are clearly not protected by the separation clause imposed upon the congress by the constitution or unjustly adopted as a restriction upon the courts.

For example, murder of a member of any religious organization is not protected nor is the orchestrated murder of any non member of any church for purposes of protecting the security or image of that church.

When such activities are discovered it becomes incumbent upon States, federal authorities and courts to separate the non religious activity from the protected "religious" activity.

In doing this, appropriate state and federal prosecutorial officers are required to make a conscious separation of activities of any given church into at least two activities which would be "religious" and racketeering.

Thus, the church, its officers, and any participating members in any definable racketeering become liable and vulnerable to criminal prosecution.

As an example, if the Pope ordered the death of any individual, he would be transformed into a "religious" criminal. The same goes for the head(s) of any religious organization otherwise protected by the separation clause.

Most crimes have a statutory limit on prosecution for a certain period based upon the crime committed.

In the case of murder or conspiracy to commit murder, there is no statutory time limit between the murder and/or conspiracy and time of prosecution. Murder is a heinous crime outlawed by most civilized governments, therefore whenever it is discovered, prosecution is ripe no matter how cold or stale is the discovering of the crime.

As to the issue of a church being prosecuted for criminal conspiracy to commit murder or any other crime a prosecutor would likely be branded as a persecutor not a prosecutor.

Of course as all any attorneys will agree, not all crimes are prosecuted. It has become the privilege of prosecutors to have a discretionary right of determining whether to prosecute or not.

To that end the congress has passed laws known as the RICO Statute or Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization(s) statute which gives private prosecutorial rights to any individual who may have been a target of the alleged RICO offenses conspired by an otherwise "religious" entity. Since the crime of murder or conspiracy to commit murder has no statute of limitations

There would be no statute limiting the time to seek such recourse.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Retired Designer-Builder formerly practicing Attorney at Law.

Credentials include ordaining a Black man to priesthood in the LDS Church leading to a public struggle with the church yielding and ordaining Black men about 2 years (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

9-11 and the Mormon-Mossad-CIA Connection

God, Mormons and Masturbation

MONSTEROUS MALIGNANCY OF 1999 MORMON CHURCH HANDBOOK OF INSTRUCTONS

THE SINISTER ENTITY BEHIND THE CHRISTIAN FACADE OF MORMONISM

Flying Under the Radar: Hiding Romney's Non Christian Credentials

'In God We Trust': The Most Blasphemous Statement Ever Engraved

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

How would this approach apply to "The Family"; con... by thomas unger on Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:40:44 AM