Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
August 27, 2008 at 14:16:04

View Ratings | Rate It

A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Dan Koch (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Dan Koch - Writer

Like a bad movie remake, the final analysis of the World Trade Center 7 collapse uses an old familiar theme revamped for modern circumstances. Only this time, unlike romantic comedies or action thrillers, the hero doesn't get the woman and the safety of the planet is still in peril. We are purposely left dangling on the edge our seats while behind the scenes, the sequels are being written. However, we aren't anticipating the sequel to this story.

It is common knowledge that in order to move the plot along in a movie, the director takes certain liberties of the audiences' imagination. Take a science fiction movie for example set in space. Everything floats in space, except when characters are on their craft. Suddenly, the gravity problem is fixed by some futuristic device or just overlooked for the convenience telling the story.

In many ways, I see this same literary device being used before my very eyes as I glanced over the final report of WTC7 released by NIST. The cause of the sudden, symmetrical, complete and rapid destruction of this building is now being attributed to a "new phenomenon" called Thermal Expansion.

According to Dr. Sunder's explanation of this process, long steel beams when heated will expand up to "a few inches". In fact, he even states that the amount of expansion can vary in relation to the length of steel. What an astounding discovery I find this to be. With all the fire tests performed on steel since humans began building with steel (The Cardington and Broadgate Fire tests are often cited). The well known results of Underwriter Laboratories fire tests on WTC 1 & 2 floor models and factor in numerous studies of prior structure fires and all the testing we've done with steel for other uses, one would think that we would have caught on to this unique property of steel.

I have written to NIST via their public comment mailbox for a clarification of this process. You will find a brief explanation of the process at www.nist.gov. I will continue to read through the final report to search for any supporting data for this finding such as any actual, physical, testing model was done, data gathered, temperature to expansion ratios must exist if it was determined that the length of the beam seems to have an impact on the amount of expansion. That's remarkable! The only known source of this phenomenon occurring is in the computer model that explains it's existence. We know NIST doesn't have any of the actual steel from WTC7 to find examples of the process. Absent of any physical demonstration of this process, supporters of the theory will undoubtedly tout this as "mystery solved" using the impeccable credentials of its authors for its plausibility. This was the best our $16M dollar investigation could give us.

And with this new found discovery, the "single theory" reigns supreme for culpability to escape again. Like the single bullet theory, the lone assassins for JFK, RFK, and MLK, the single mad scientist, we can now add the single column theory to our growing number of "days of infamy". One column, with an ordinary fire, gives way and brings down 80 others at the same time, straight down, in under 7 seconds. Like gravity in a sc-fi movie, we must imagine that over redundancy doesn't exist in this fire and gravity collapse so we can get on with the story. Even the computer aided graphic used by NIST looks nothing like the video and just magically collapses the right side of the building. Yet, we're told to just believe. Here is your report, mystery solved, now go about your business, work and buy stuff.

NIST will take public comments on the draft report and recommendations. Comments must be received by noon Eastern Daylight Time on Sept.15, 2008. Comments may be submitted via:

* e-mail to wtc@nist.gov;

* fax to (301) 869-6275; or

* surface mail to WTC Technical Information Repository, Attn:Stephen Cauffman, NIST, 100 Bureau Dr., Stop 8611, Gaithersburg, Md. 20899-8610.

Instructions for submitting comments are available at http://wtc.nist.gov.

By Dan Koch.

 

I am just concerned single father of 2 trying to make sense of this crazy world. I am college educated. I have Degrees in Business Administration and Accounting. I try to bring an average middle class point of view to my articles about what is going (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "911 Coverup"
Welcome to Terrorland: Mohamed Atta
by Daniel Hopsicker

$19.95
Lowest New Price $11.44

Number of pages: 414
Publisher: Trine Day

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
116 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

I cannot tell from reading your article whether it is your by Brett Paatsch on Wednesday, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:10:39 PM
- and another tip by siamdave on Wednesday, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:58:09 PM
Here are some more tips by albury smith on Thursday, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:45:31 AM
I don't belief that by Brett Paatsch on Friday, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:34:24 AM
As usual people be hatin the numbers by Intelitary Milligence on Wednesday, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:15:32 PM
I don't know by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Aug 28, 2008 at 2:39:48 AM
People need to actually read the report. by Jeremy R. Hammond on Saturday, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:18:27 AM
Dog Logic by Keystone on Wednesday, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:05:57 PM
What do you want me to look at in the footage and why? by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:02:32 AM
Bar-B-Q experiment by Keystone on Thursday, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:47:43 AM
My "drivel" by albury smith on Thursday, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:25:34 AM
LOL! by Harold Smith on Thursday, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:50:04 AM
More messages by albury smith on Thursday, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:01:29 AM
Please meremark, don't just call someone a liar without by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Aug 28, 2008 at 6:56:43 PM
That's great stuff! by Harold Smith on Friday, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:16:22 AM
Simple question by albury smith on Monday, Sep 1, 2008 at 8:55:24 AM
again by Bob Smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:19:22 AM
I accept your general point that metals conduct heat by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Aug 28, 2008 at 6:43:29 PM
Labor Day 9/1 by Keystone on Thursday, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:08:56 AM
Huh??? by Jeremy R. Hammond on Saturday, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:20:59 AM
Trash Writing by Jeremy R. Hammond on Friday, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:42:53 PM
Bottom Line by Cinderfella on Saturday, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:54:37 AM
Yes. by Jeremy R. Hammond on Saturday, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:22:33 AM
Crime scene? by tim bristol on Saturday, Aug 30, 2008 at 8:30:51 PM
Aluminium Thermal Expansion by Keystone on Saturday, Aug 30, 2008 at 2:14:43 AM
Yup. by Jeremy R. Hammond on Saturday, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:23:55 AM
Evidence of Thermal Cutting Charges by Cassie on Saturday, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:48:11 PM
Link? by Jeremy R. Hammond on Saturday, Aug 30, 2008 at 11:05:07 PM
Nonsense, there was no "Evidence of Thermal Cutting Charges" by albury smith on Monday, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:07:05 AM
Not really.... by Bob Smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:02:33 PM
"Nonsense" by Albvry Smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:33:01 PM
Wow - keen insight by Tom Murphy on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:28:11 PM
Why so much effort to "explain" away WTC? by bucketslogg on Tuesday, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:26:51 AM
More conspirators? by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:13:24 PM
WHAT??? by Bob Smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:14:57 PM
Don't be bashful, Bob by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:56:03 AM
This should work by Keystone on Tuesday, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:32:56 PM
your desperation is getting obvious by siamdave on Wednesday, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:13:51 AM
It's disgust, not desperation by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:26:26 PM
Here's another photo of that raging inferno by Albvry Smith on Wednesday, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:06:51 PM
Your photo by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 3, 2008 at 3:03:31 PM
"read your comment" by Albvry Smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:38:24 PM
I know what I said by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 6, 2008 at 10:49:27 AM
Fueling fires? by Albvry Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:31:31 PM
Remus and Romulus by Keystone on Wednesday, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:47:38 PM
Which will collapse first? by albury smith on Thursday, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:06:26 AM
this building did not 'global collapse'. your mind, maybe .. by siamdave on Thursday, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:11:48 AM
Read NCSTAR1 by albury smith on Thursday, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:26:08 AM
So... by Bob Smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:49:31 AM
Yep by albury smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:57:04 PM
Wow... by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:28:23 PM
Nice straw man by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:47:00 PM
I'm being... by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:09:20 PM
Shallow? by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:14:34 PM
OCT-er out to lunch - did we know this already? by siamdave on Thursday, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:33:00 AM
What a relief by albury smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:18:06 PM
Black smoke = cool fire? by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 6, 2008 at 2:41:13 PM
NIST truths .... by siamdave on Thursday, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:20:05 PM
Computer simulation of the impact of UA 175 by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:43:34 AM
Nose cone out? by Albvry Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:07:45 PM
Nose cone? by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:23:02 PM
"Emerging debris" by Albvry Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:59:09 PM
Dunces by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:28:20 PM
"Scary Stupid" by Albvry Smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:11:36 AM
Explanation by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:51:43 AM
Here's another photo of the "emerging debris" by Albvry Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:03:34 PM
A closer look at the "emerging debris" by Albvry Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:21:12 PM
Nose cone out by Albvry Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:24:02 PM
Good Lord by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:31:45 PM
That's nice Ms. Smith by Albvry Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:08:16 PM
Your blurry pictures and goofy no-plane "theory" by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:23:32 PM
Changing the subject by Albvry Smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:06:46 AM
Newest theory for the "truth" movement by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:42:59 AM
No Plane? by Albvry Smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:09:17 AM
Special plane? by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:31:32 PM
Who said it wasn't UA 175 by Albvry Smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:06:29 PM
Reading comprehension assistance by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:37:33 PM
Why not? by Albvry Smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:53:05 PM
There's hope by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:17:48 PM
Maybe... by Albvry Smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:21:30 AM
re: Maybe... by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:56:49 AM
Rod Serlings' - Space / Time Continuum by Keystone on Thursday, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:49:53 PM
credibility vs OCT by siamdave on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 4:14:02 AM
The big dope by albury smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:32:54 PM
Yes... by Bob Smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:33:49 AM
More lying from Bob Smith by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 6, 2008 at 9:31:46 AM
This is called corroberating evidence evidence of explosions by Bob Smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:24:58 AM
I'm enjoying by albury smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 4:48:35 PM
It's amazing... by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:53:39 PM
Yes, that is amazing by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:16:32 PM
Sorry I didn't explain it clearly enough by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:24:10 PM
Magnitude? by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:18:56 PM
correction... by Bob Smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:14:01 PM
re: correction... by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:21:32 PM
Collapse by jeff prager on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:05:02 PM
They couldn't fly? by albury smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:46:19 PM
This is such B.S. by Albvry Smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:55:38 PM
Hani Hanjour and the other heroes of the "truth" movement by albury smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 8:12:02 PM
what's the matter? by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:50:01 PM
Why ask me? by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:51:36 PM
At least... by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:03:14 PM
Faux News by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:28:08 PM
Venice flight school ( front for narco dist.) by Keystone on Saturday, Sep 6, 2008 at 4:54:57 AM
and another one.... by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:20:32 PM
It wouldn't be the first time by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:02:04 PM
The burden of truth.... by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:04:27 PM
That's fortunate by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:33:27 PM
Someone should call... by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:07:19 PM
Hey A. Smith! by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:10:43 PM
You do it, then by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:48:06 AM
Bombs? that's just silly by Albvry Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:35:37 PM
*chuckles* Silly, indeed! by Tom Murphy on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:18:35 PM
One question, Dave by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:17:34 PM
hey Alburara Smith... by Bob Smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:33:46 AM
Loose Change Forum and "no-plane" nuts by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:25:32 PM
If it looks like a duck by Keystone on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:07:30 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum