Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   3 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

A Cup Half-Full You Can Believe In

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 9/18/10

So, the Republican Party embraces its Tea Party wing, willing to compromise its conservative political perspective for the sake of enthusiastic, if simplistic, voter support, while the Democratic administration, not content merely to ignore its Progressive wing, feels the need to mock it.

David Brooks assures us that the party of banned masturbation will not discomfort the "independents," whose votes will be determinative in 2010, even as the Obama administration draws the same conclusion with regard to its stated contempt for its own passionate left.

The net effect of all this political calculus is that both the Democratic and Republican Parties are scrambling for the votes of an amorphous "independent" constituency, and are blurring any definitive identification with the wings of their own parties. Politics as usual.

In this bizarre world, Barack Obama assumes the mantle of George W. Bush, arguing in court, for example, that his executive powers permit him to ignore the Constitutional protections that our nation extends to those accused of wrongdoing -- that they be detained only after charges have been issued, that they have a right to face their accusers in open court, that they have access to legal counsel, and that they have the right to a speedy trial in which the burden of proof is on the accuser.

Meanwhile, the Republicans present themselves as shocked that the President has not done more to create jobs for blue collar Americans. Ah, yes -- Republicans, the historic champion of the working class. I wonder why it is that even casual voters are disgusted with both parties?

The clear losers in this political miasma are Progressives. The President has announced that he will continue to ignore our well-articulated concerns, and he also will condemn us if his bland political pragmatism fails in the elections of 2010, with the result that an impotent Democratic Party is replaced by an impotent Republican Party.

Progressives are an unrepresented constituency. It is a constituency that Candidate Obama courted ferociously to win the Presidency, and will no doubt court again in the next few weeks. Given the public contempt of President Obama for Progressives, Candidate Obama will have his hands full in that effort.


I am a retired boatbuilder with a fascination for political thought. Most of my life I cheerfully described myself as an "eastern establishment, knee jerk, liberal Democrat."

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Capitalism and Health Care

Corporate America's Secret Weapon: Socialism

The Occupation is the Message

Follow the Money

A Case Study: Dawn E. Johnsen

A Pol Meets a Senator


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Does anyone doubt that Karl Rove and Rahm Emanuel ... by Donald de Fano on Saturday, Sep 18, 2010 at 3:23:06 PM
They're in different parties?In fact, aren't they ... by Miriam Callaghan on Sunday, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:06:11 PM
...and what part of the Democratic Party do activi... by Christopher Lunn on Sunday, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:05:13 PM