Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

A Pol Meets a Senator

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 6/21/14

(image by Ninian Reid /)

Chris Matthews recent "testy" exchange with Elizabeth Warren simply must be seen as something more than his routine personal struggle with his ego and his scarcely disguised suspicion that he is, after all, perhaps not the brightest bulb on the string. The difference that distinguishes this encounter is his deliberate, and not typical, rhetorical use of "cheap shots." First of all, he rhetorically puts Warren in the position of being a spokesperson for the Democratic Party, which he with his self-vaunted insider "hardball" persona (and any thinking person who has observed her political career) knows she clearly is not. Then he faults her as a proxy for Barack Obama, another phony characterization, and doubles down on the President's (and by implication her) inability to move forward a political agenda. "You're not getting it done!" He cites Democratic control of the executive and the Senate, as if that "power base" were sufficient to offset a House that each day obstructs any effort the President makes to advance even the most obvious and least controversial policies. One might have thought that in Matthews' professional training as an aide to Tip O'Neill, he would have noticed the power of that body to obstruct or encourage bipartisan behavior. In fact he has written a book on that subject. Then there's a Senate whose Republican notion of a simple majority is sixty out of a hundred. Does he really hold Elizabeth Warren responsible for not achieving national job creation and infrastructure repair? Why stop there? Why hasn't she straightened out gun control, voting rights, and immigration?

The point is that Matthews picked a spurious fight, and did so with an egregious enthusiasm. "Give me a date, give me a date," he trumpeted while abusing his pundit's prerogative of control of the microphone and volume to prevent a response. What's going on here? Does Chris think he needs to head off any suspicion that he is a lapdog of the progressive wing of the party? Was this a dog whistle to the Clinton machine that he was still available to be a friend of Hillary? Perhaps it was personal. Maybe he just doesn't like Warren, or sees in her something he doesn't see in himself. In any case, his de minimis "You're a fine Senator, but . . ." doesn't change the reality that he, not she, was the loser in this confrontation.

(Article changed on June 21, 2014 at 19:15)

(Article changed on June 21, 2014 at 19:20)


I am a retired boatbuilder with a fascination for political thought. Most of my life I cheerfully described myself as an "eastern establishment, knee jerk, liberal Democrat."

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Capitalism and Health Care

Corporate America's Secret Weapon: Socialism

The Occupation is the Message

Follow the Money

A Case Study: Dawn E. Johnsen

A Pol Meets a Senator


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Why is it that men think that something important ... by Shirley Braverman on Sunday, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:58:00 PM
I had to stop watching him some years ago. He's li... by Sherry Gadberry Turner on Monday, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:00:43 AM