Tag(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 10/13/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (9 comments)

A Crazy Idea; Replace the US Senate it with Senatiament

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (176 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

We need real democracy in America, if America is to virtually survive, and that means the end of the tyranny of the senate, where senators representing a million or less people have voting power equal to senators representing 10, 20, even 40 million.

It is time to end the Senate as we know it. This is a big deal, an extremely challenging problem. But it is clear the future of America depends upon it.

The answer is to require that any senator must represent a single state or group of states with a population of about 3.07 million people.

Some states will band together. Some states will have several senators worth. Some will have extra people and may seek to get other states to work with them.

The larger states with two or more senators coming to them will run elections for all three senators at the same time and if, say, the state is eligible for three senators, the candidates coming in first, second and third will represent the state.

Senators will have three year terms.



At any time, states can withdraw from a multi-state alliance and re-ally with another group. The senators representing the changed configurations will all lose their jobs and have to run again, given the new circumstances. If one state has, say eight million citizens, and it loses an alliance with a state like Maine, which has 1.3 citizens, then two of the senators will be safe, they will then have to re-notiate or lose representation. And Maine will have to re-ally to get any representation.

This will cause a situation similar, in some ways, to parliaments in other nations. Call the new senate a Senatiament. Such re-alignments will take place with the approval of the voters, not governors or state congresses. That would give california 12 senators and texas about 8 senators.

Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Maine, north and south Dakota-- they would lose their power and would have to merge together. Some states will not have their own representative. They will have to share one with another or other states.

This will be fought massively, as any change from the status quo will, but America's future hangs in the balance. Deals cut, for the most part, 150 years ago, can no longer stand. Circumstances have changed too much.

I know this is revolutionary. While we're at it, we should require paper ballots and instant run-off voting that gives third party candidates a fair chance. We could even run elections for all three senators in a state/state-group so the first, second and third place victors, etc. would be elected. In states with more than three senators, the vote would be very interesting, with the possibility of exotic third party candidates winning. That would really shake things up.

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Or at least repeal the 17th amendment by Dick Thomson on Tuesday, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:30:52 PM
Tyranny of the Majority? by Richmond Shreve on Tuesday, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:29:00 PM
Domestic Tranquility - the DT's by gone on Tuesday, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:03:01 PM
Campaign reform is at the top of all issues. by Janiece Senn on Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:22:56 AM
You're a pretty pragmatic guy by Maxwell on Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:09:39 PM
Yes, one House of Representatives is enough already by Scott Baker on Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:58:21 PM
Me no like Rob by shirley reese on Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:50:56 PM
Official slogan by Bryan Emmel on Thursday, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:29:24 AM
We do need political reform. by Bryan Emmel on Thursday, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:26:15 AM