![]() |
By Rob Kall (about the author) Page 2 of 2 page(s)
The story continues. I just received this reply from the writer:
Sounds right to me, Rob.Therefore, in the future, I will continue to rely upon your system of publishing rules, judgments, etc.,It seems to be working just fine.I submit, then you either accept or reject.Sounds like a winner to me.Again, it's a mistake for folks to take this stuff personally - I don't.Keep up the good work - even though I personally don't approve of your policy, it is after all, your policy, not mine.A note to the editor who rejected my piece:I write what I want because it contains the message I want to say. Simple.If I wanted to write a love note to Hillary, I would have whispered sweet nothings to her. I didn't.If I wanted to operate within the bounds of what I perceive to be OpedNews' policy - I would have - but I didn't.I sought to be fairly offensive to the Clinton's and their supporters: Mission accomplished.Probative value? Of course the article possesses informational value.That's the beautiful thing about America, I have the right to submit and you have the right to reject.Lovely.
A nice, satisfying wrap to an email exchange that could have gone in a very different direction.
1 | 2
Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, (more...)
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 55 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |