Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
November 27, 2007 at 10:35:46

View Ratings | Rate It

Confronting the FCC Monolith

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Kevin Gosztola (about the author)     Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

The then-Media Bureau Chiefs express desire to only release "positive" information and to "change the focus" to "make it more positive" throw the objectivity of FCC media ownership reports and proposals into doubt.

The FCC's website states that, "along with competition and diversity, promoting localism is a key goal of the Commission's media ownership rules." This vital goal should not be minimized or ignored in the rush to produce a ruling. Accordingly, I ask the FCC to, at a minimum, complete the separate localism proceeding prior to making decisions on the current media ownership rules. This proceeding should provide ample opportunity for the public to comment on any conclusions or proposed rule changes.

While the Commission has commissioned some reports and held some hearings on media ownership, there is no completed localism proceeding to inform the consideration of proposals in this area. In addition, the selective burying of reports raises questions about the objectivity of the FCC reports that were allowed to be published. Moreover, the limited hearings that have been held have confirmed that other issues of public importance, including the lack of women-owned and minority-owned broadcast stations, deserve more careful attention from the Commission. Keeping in mind the contentious media ownership proposal in 2003, I respectfully suggest the need for additional information gathering and opportunities for public comment before the Commission acts on this matter again. I look forward to your response.

The Senate, in fact, held a hearing on February 1, 2007, to scrutinize the FCC harshly for its practices on telephone, television, radio, Internet and other services that people use daily.

Indeed, it would seem if Americans can commend the Democrats for doing one thing since gaining control of Congress, it should be for their actions in defense of the public airwaves. While they have been largely inadequate, there is at least proof that actions have been taken when in most other areas of American policy domestic and foreign you can barely tell that Democrats have been in control of Congress for almost a year now or taken steps towards changing the path America is on. Had we a Republican Congress right now, you can bet Martin would have already changed the rules. You can bet Martin would not be pretending to be interested in the least bit in what people have to say as local proceedings have gone on in the past months all over the country.



So, at this juncture in history, we are faced with a choice.

As a writer for an alternative news website, I shudder at the fact that someday this successful site could be bought up by CNN, FOX News, NBC, or for that matter, any newspaper publication in circulation right now.

Think of what would happen. Think of all the advertisements. Think of the lack of news and the lack of openness and control of thought that would go on. Think of what would happen if the lack of news on television seeped into the Internet because Big Media controlled it. Think about what would happen if Tribune Co. said it controlled OpEdNews.

We must realize this plan for changes to rules by Kevin J. Martin is not just an end. It’s a means that will get Martin’s FCC baby to its end.

There will be more rule changes to come if we allow this one. And if that next one is allowed, more rule changes will come. And Martin and the FCC won’t stop until they’ve given power to all the corporations that desire it and until he has homogenized, saturated, and controlled all the outlets of media that reach the public---until he has set up media to serve the government forever.

Dorgan’s Media Ownership Act will not fix the problem that the FCC poses for America. In fact, the bill calls for Americans to have their voices heard and to speak up on how this move will affect them or why they do not want the rules to be changed. Specifically, if this act is passed, it pushes the FCC to take into account the local proceedings fully and in fact, maybe hold another round of local proceedings where the American people can give their testimony on the issue. Therefore, the members of Congress and the Senate are putting the future of media in our hands and in fact trying to convince the FCC to allow us to have the power to decide what happens with America’s airwaves.

We all should graciously accept this power and responsibly use it to spur reform. and should not expect the Senate or the House to be successful in challenging the FCC if we fail to back them up. If their argument against the FCC's plans is that we disagree with further media consolidation, than they need us to prove that what they are saying to the FCC is true. The Senate and House need us to keep them from backing down.

Having witnessed our senators and congressmen planting the seeds of change or laying a foundation for Americans to step up and demand media reform, let’s ask for more action from our senators and congressmen.

Let's ask them for more reform that goes beyond just getting the FCC to listen to us. Let’s ask for more reform from our presidential candidates on this issue, Republican and Democrat. Let’s ask for more reform from people who will be running for election in local, state, and federal elections in 2008.

Let’s go to local proceedings and make them go on into the wee hours of the night so that the FCC, our government, and our elected officials know the American people disagree with the FCC’s plans for media “reform.” Let’s dictate the reform that we want and detail what we want the media to be.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Oppose Chairman Kevin J. Martin's Plan for Further Media Consolidation

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Kevin Gosztola is a trusted author who publishes his writing regularly to OpEdNews and Open Salon and he is a 2009 Young People For Fellow. He is a documentary filmmaker currently completing a Film/Video degree at Columbia College in Chicago. (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Book Recommendations for " Congress Corporation News"
The Global Status of the Project Management Profession: A Report from the First Global Project Management Forum New Orleans, Louisiana, USA October 15, 1995
by Global Project Management Forum 1995 World Trade Center of New orlean

$14.95

Number of pages: 182
Publisher: Project Management Institute

Innovation, Evolution And Economic Change: New Ideas in the Tradition of Galbraith

$130.00
Lowest New Price $127.85

Number of pages: 333
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

Bargaining Without Boundaries: The Multinational Corporation and International Labor Relations (Studies in Business and Society)
by Arnold Robert Weber

$20.00

Number of pages: 258
Publisher: Univ of Chicago Pr (Tx)

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum