90 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 21 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

What War on Terror?

By       (Page 2 of 8 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   3 comments
Message Steve Beckow
Become a Fan
  (9 fans)
This is 1977 and they were talking about creating a war in the Gulf region when there was $25 billion in the space-based weapons program that … had not [yet] been identified. It wasn’t called the Strategic Defence Initiative at least until 1983.  This weapons system had obviously been going on for some time that I didn’t know anything about.


So I stood up in this meeting in 1977 and I said I’d like to know why we’re talking about space-based weapons against these enemies. I’d like to know more about this. Would somebody tell me what this is about? Nobody answered.  They went on with this meeting as if I hadn’t said anything.”
(2)
 


  

The fact that the members of the meeting accepted the chart of “enemies” as ordinary, normal, and not to be discussed, suggests that its contents had been decided on earlier than 1977.


One way of putting what Werner von Braun and Carol Rosin talk about here in context is to say that the military-industrial complex (MIC) operates on the principle of always having an enemy.  Wars are its lifeblood.


In the year 2000, a group of neoconservatives calling themselves the Project for a New American Century predicted that, short of a “catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor," (4) it would be difficult to rally America behind their goal of rebuilding America’s defenses.


On September 11, 2001, PNAC got the “new Pearl Harbor” they wanted, the raison d’être for a new war – a “war on terrorism.” 
On “9/11,” a team of conspirators brought down three World Trade Center buildings, attacked the Pentagon, and allegedly destroyed an unknown type of aircraft above Pennsylvania. (3)


In my opinion, the membership of the team, if collusion in events implies membership, consisted of the President, the Vice-President, some members of the cabinet, some aides, the command structures of Northern Command, NORAD, the Navy, the CIA, and the FBI, foreign operatives including MOSSAD and the Pakistani ISI, and allies in businesses like Securacom, United Airlines, the World Trade Center, etc.  


Let’s look at how this false-flag operation was probably run.


In the view of events that I accept, the 9/11 base of operations was the U.S.S. George Washington, anchored off Long Island. Boeing 757 or 767 drone jets, originating from an unknown base, loaded with napalm, and remote-controlled by a white jet and helicopter launched from the Washington, attacked World Trade Center Buildings 1 and 2. (5)   


A Fox News employee said that he witnessed the second plane go into the World Trade Center.  It had no windows on it and a large blue logo. He described it as more like a cargo plane than a passenger jet. (6)  In the only clear pictures I have seen of it, it has a pod under its belly, which normal passenger jets do not have.  Flight 11, according to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, was not on the scheduled list to fly on 9/11. (7) 


A flash of light is visible as the planes hit the Twin Towers, followed by a napalm explosion. The resulting fires eventually cooled and were close to going out when the military helicopter circling the building ignited, by remote control, thousands of previously-set thermate cutter charges, bringing down the Twin Towers. (8)  The cutter charges were probably installed prior to 9/11, during several total closures of the WTC buildings. (9)  Security for the complex was provided by Securacom, a company of which Marvin Bush, the President’s brother, was a director. (10)  


After the buildings were destroyed, no one was allowed to examine the debris, which was quickly carted away and shipped overseas. (11) In other words, the evidence from the crime scene was disposed of.  No criminal investigation has ever been held and no charges have been laid.


Building 7 was not hit by a plane.  Only small fires were seen burning inside it.  Owner Larry Silverstein admitted to PBS that it was “pulled” or demolished:

 


“I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. I said, you know, we’ve had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull. And we watched the building collapse.” (12)  

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Steve Beckow Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

The author is a former Member of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada and a member of Mensa Canada. He is the author of several Internet books and articles on gender persecution, cross-cultural spirituality, life after death, and the 2012 (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend