Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

What War on Terror?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (9 fans)   -- Page 2 of 7 page(s)

opednews.com


So I stood up in this meeting in 1977 and I said I’d like to know why we’re talking about space-based weapons against these enemies. I’d like to know more about this. Would somebody tell me what this is about? Nobody answered.  They went on with this meeting as if I hadn’t said anything.” (2)  


  

The fact that the members of the meeting accepted the chart of “enemies” as ordinary, normal, and not to be discussed, suggests that its contents had been decided on earlier than 1977.


One way of putting what Werner von Braun and Carol Rosin talk about here in context is to say that the military-industrial complex (MIC) operates on the principle of always having an enemy.  Wars are its lifeblood.


In the year 2000, a group of neoconservatives calling themselves the Project for a New American Century predicted that, short of a “catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor," (4) it would be difficult to rally America behind their goal of rebuilding America’s defenses.


On September 11, 2001, PNAC got the “new Pearl Harbor” they wanted, the raison d’être for a new war – a “war on terrorism.” 
On “9/11,” a team of conspirators brought down three World Trade Center buildings, attacked the Pentagon, and allegedly destroyed an unknown type of aircraft above Pennsylvania. (3)



In my opinion, the membership of the team, if collusion in events implies membership, consisted of the President, the Vice-President, some members of the cabinet, some aides, the command structures of Northern Command, NORAD, the Navy, the CIA, and the FBI, foreign operatives including MOSSAD and the Pakistani ISI, and allies in businesses like Securacom, United Airlines, the World Trade Center, etc.  


Let’s look at how this false-flag operation was probably run.


In the view of events that I accept, the 9/11 base of operations was the U.S.S. George Washington, anchored off Long Island. Boeing 757 or 767 drone jets, originating from an unknown base, loaded with napalm, and remote-controlled by a white jet and helicopter launched from the Washington, attacked World Trade Center Buildings 1 and 2. (5)   


A Fox News employee said that he witnessed the second plane go into the World Trade Center.  It had no windows on it and a large blue logo. He described it as more like a cargo plane than a passenger jet. (6)  In the only clear pictures I have seen of it, it has a pod under its belly, which normal passenger jets do not have.  Flight 11, according to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, was not on the scheduled list to fly on 9/11. (7) 


A flash of light is visible as the planes hit the Twin Towers, followed by a napalm explosion. The resulting fires eventually cooled and were close to going out when the military helicopter circling the building ignited, by remote control, thousands of previously-set thermate cutter charges, bringing down the Twin Towers. (8)  The cutter charges were probably installed prior to 9/11, during several total closures of the WTC buildings. (9)  Security for the complex was provided by Securacom, a company of which Marvin Bush, the President’s brother, was a director. (10)  


After the buildings were destroyed, no one was allowed to examine the debris, which was quickly carted away and shipped overseas. (11) In other words, the evidence from the crime scene was disposed of.  No criminal investigation has ever been held and no charges have been laid.


Building 7 was not hit by a plane.  Only small fires were seen burning inside it.  Owner Larry Silverstein admitted to PBS that it was “pulled” or demolished:

 


“I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. I said, you know, we’ve had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull. And we watched the building collapse.” (12)  




Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Stop the War on Terror

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

The author is a former Member of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada and a member of Mensa Canada. He is the author of several Internet books and articles on gender persecution, cross-cultural spirituality, life after death, and the 2012 (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Central Bankers terror network by Patrick on Wednesday, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:49:01 PM
good recap of the plan by mary sunshine on Thursday, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:05:42 AM
pods and missiles = disinfo and red herrings by Better World Order on Sunday, Nov 9, 2008 at 1:44:37 PM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2012, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum