Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 6   Valuable 3   Interesting 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (6 comments)

THE FED NOW OWNS THE WORLD'S LARGEST INSURANCE COMPANY -- BUT WHO OWNS THE FED?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (88 fans)   -- Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

*   “The Federal Reserve’s income is derived primarily from the interest on U.S. government securities that it has acquired through open market operations. . . . After paying its expenses, the Federal Reserve turns the rest of its earnings over to the U.S. Treasury.”5 

So let’s review: 

1.   The Fed is privately owned. 

Its shareholders are private banks.  In fact, 100% of its shareholders are private banks.  None of its stock is owned by the government. 

2.  The fact that the Fed does not get “appropriations” from Congress basically means that it gets its money from Congress without congressional approval, by engaging in “open market operations.”  

Here is how it works: When the government is short of funds, the Treasury issues bonds and delivers them to bond dealers, which auction them off.  When the Fed wants to “expand the money supply” (create money), it steps in and buys bonds from these dealers with newly-issued dollars acquired by the Fed for the cost of writing them into an account on a computer screen.  These maneuvers are called “open market operations” because the Fed buys the bonds on the “open market” from the bond dealers.  The bonds then become the “reserves” that the banking establishment uses to back its loans.  In another bit of sleight of hand known as “fractional reserve” lending, the same reserves are lent many times over, further expanding the money supply, generating interest for the banks with each loan.  It was this money-creating process that prompted Wright Patman, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee in the 1960s, to call the Federal Reserve “a total money-making machine.”  He wrote:  

“When the Federal Reserve writes a check for a government bond it does exactly what any bank does, it creates money, it created money purely and simply by writing a check.”  

3.  The Fed generates profits for its shareholders.   

The interest on bonds acquired with its newly-issued Federal Reserve Notes pays the Fed’s operating expenses plus a guaranteed 6% return to its banker shareholders.  A mere 6% a year may not be considered a profit in the world of Wall Street high finance, but most businesses that manage to cover all their expenses and give their shareholders a guaranteed 6% return are considered “for profit” corporations.     

In addition to this guaranteed 6%, the banks will now be getting interest from the taxpayers on their “reserves.”  The basic reserve requirement set by the Federal Reserve is 10%.  The website of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York explains that as money is redeposited and relent throughout the banking system, this 10% held in “reserve” can be fanned into ten times that sum in loans; that is, $10,000 in reserves becomes $100,000 in loans.  Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.8 puts the total “loans and leases in bank credit” as of September 24, 2008 at $7,049 billion.  Ten percent of that is $700 billion.  That means we the taxpayers will be paying interest to the banks on at least $700 billion annually – this so that the banks can retain the reserves to accumulate interest on ten times that sum in loans.     

The banks earn these returns from the taxpayers for the privilege of having the banks’ interests protected by an all-powerful independent private central bank, even when those interests may be opposed to the taxpayers’ -- for example, when the banks use their special status as private money creators to fund speculative derivative schemes that threaten to collapse the U.S. economy.  Among other special benefits, banks and other financial institutions (but not other corporations) can borrow at the low Fed funds rate of about 2%.  They can then turn around and put this money into 30-year Treasury bonds at 4.5%, earning an immediate 2.5% from the taxpayers, just by virtue of their position as favored banks.  A long list of banks (but not other corporations) is also now protected from the short selling that can crash the price of other stocks.   

Time to Change the Statute? 

According to the Fed’s website, the control Congress has over the Federal Reserve is limited to this: 

“[T]he Federal Reserve is subject to oversight by Congress, which periodically reviews its activities and can alter its responsibilities by statute.” 

As we know from watching the business news, “oversight” basically means that Congress gets to see the results when it’s over.  The Fed periodically reports to Congress, but the Fed doesn’t ask; it tells.  The only real leverage Congress has over the Fed is that it “can alter its responsibilities by statute.”  It is time for Congress to exercise that leverage and make the Federal Reserve a truly federal agency, acting by and for the people through their elected representatives.  If the Fed can demand AIG’s stock in return for an $85 billion loan to the mega-insurer, we can demand the Fed’s stock in return for the trillion-or-so dollars we’ll be advancing to bail out the private banking system from its follies.   

If the Fed were actually a federal agency, the government could issue U.S. legal tender directly, avoiding an unnecessary interest-bearing debt to private middlemen who create the money out of thin air themselves.  Among other benefits to the taxpayers. a truly “federal” Federal Reserve could lend the full faith and credit of the United States to state and local governments interest-free, cutting the cost of infrastructure in half, restoring the thriving local economies of earlier decades.   

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Ellen Brown is an attorney, president of the Public Banking Institute, and author of 11 books. Her websites are http://WebofDebt.com, http://EllenBrown.com, and http://PublicBankingInstitute.org. In her latest book, "Web of Debt: The Shocking (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Federal Reserve 101 by William John Cox on Wednesday, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:48:22 PM
Ellen Brown's New Book: "The Web of Debt" by David Benton on Wednesday, Oct 8, 2008 at 6:09:06 PM
What is More Important? by reasonableperson on Wednesday, Oct 8, 2008 at 6:26:21 PM
ADDENDUM: WHO OWNS THE BANKS THAT OWN THE FED? by Ellen Brown on Wednesday, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:22:12 PM
Money v. Credit by Tom Chechatka on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:56:28 PM
agree and disagree by Ellen Brown on Saturday, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:36:26 AM