May 11, 2011
Money-Business Permalink View Article Stats
Time for De-Billionairization?
By Rob Kall (about the author ) Become a Fan (193 fans)
opednews.com
Poll
Time for De-Billionairization?
Should the US lead the world in making it illegal and impossible to be a billionaire? Should a limit of $500 or $200 or $100 million be set as a limit to the wealth someone might possess?
Pro: Billionaires wealth give them too much power and human weakness cannot be trusted with it. Wealth should be judged based on the good a person does, not the money he or she has. It would be possible to allow entrepreneurs to retain equity control of successful corporations without them having the money part of it. That might even be attractive-- a class of stock where the value is sold and rises and falls, but the equity is retained by the founder.
Cons: Money motivates innovation and investment.
Debillionairization could be done by legislation gradually implemented, so no new billionaires could evolve and no billionaires could leave descendants billion dollar fortunes.
Invite Your Friend(s) to Vote:
View All Polls
Share This Poll
You can publish this poll on your blog or website. To embed a poll, just copy the code from this "Embed" box.
Once you've copied the code, just paste it into your website or blog to embed it.
Embed:
Customize
<script language="JavaScript" src="http://www.opednews.com/populum/poll_api.php?pid=561&layout=default"></script>
Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, ( more... )