Back   OpEdNews
Post a Comment
Original Content at
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

May 8, 2009

What Specter's Spectacular Could Portend

By Deena Stryker

How Specter's move could make it possible to create a third party without having to start from scratch.


Arlen Specter's move to the Democratic Party could be the start of a realignment that would get this country out of the box it built with its two party system.

Here's how I see it. The leftmost member of the Republican Party moves over to the Democratic Party, thereby making it crystal clear that the Dems do not really play left to the Republicans' right, but rather that both are essentially centrist parties.

As long as this equation remains, there is no chance of the United States every rejoining the rest of the civilized world, which is social democratic.  Now, that can happen.

It has hitherto been impossible for a third party to be anything more than an election spoiler.  But attempts have hitherto been confined to dissatisfied members of one or the other of the main parties going off and creating an Independent Party, whether or not it is called such.  Now, very differently, there is a real opportunity for the Progressive Caucus to secede from the Democratic Party to create a Social Democratic Party.

Polarization between the two major parties has for decades been mild.  Since the election of President Obama it is becoming dramatic.  This means that there are in effect three distinct political trends in this country: left, right and center. The now very small Republican Party having slid toward the extreme right, there has to be a party that is explicitly to the left of the Democratic Party, which occupies the middle ground--a Social Democratic Party.

Part of the polarization is an attempt by the right to confuse an untutored public by conflating socialism with fascism, and by conveniently overlooking the fact that for 70 years, "socialism," unless specifically defined, was code for "communism."

Roosevelt's New Deal was bucking Stalinism.  Supporters of Obama's New Deal have to be clear about what they want it to mean: Democratic Socialism.

Now is the time. Specter has opened the way.

Submitters Website:

Submitters Bio:

Born in Phila, I spent most of my adolescent and adult years in
Europe, resulting over time in several unique books, my latest being Russia's Americans.

CUBA: Diary of a
Revolution, Inside the Cuban Revolution with Fidel, Raul, Che, and Celia

Lunch with Fellini,
Dinner with Fidel: An Illustrated Personal Journey from the Cold War to the
Arab Spring

America Revealed to a
Honey-Colored World

A Taoist Politics: The
Case For Sacredness

I began my journalistic career at the French News Agency in Rome,
spent two years in Cuba finding out whether the Barbados were Communists before
they made the revolution ('Cuba 1964: When the Revolution was Young'). After
spending half a decade in Eastern Europe, and a decade in the U.S., studying
Global Survival and writing speeches in the Carter State Department, I wrote
the only book that foresaw the fall of the Berlin Wall AND the dissolution of
the Soviet Union ("Une autre Europe, un autre Monde'). My memoir, 'Lunch
with Fellini, Dinner with Fidel', tells it all. 'A Taoist Politics: The Case
for Sacredness', which examines the similarities between ancient wisdom and
modern science and what this implies for political activism; and 'America Revealed
to a Honey-Colored World" is a pamphlet about how the U.S. came down from
the City on a Hill'.