Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 8/19/17

Why Trump Could Be Gone Before 2020

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   No comments
Author 72590
Message Paul Street
Become a Fan
  (14 fans)

From Counterpunch

(Image by Photo by Mark Taylor)   Details   DMCA

A story that appeared in the leading inside-Washington political journal The Hill last week bore a headline that ought to send a chill down the spine of anyone who believes in democracy: "Half of Republicans Would Back Postponing 2020 Election if Trump Proposed It." Read the report's opening 90 words and let them sink in:

"Slightly more than half of Republicans say they would support postponing the 2020 presidential election if President Trump proposed it to make sure only eligible American citizens can vote, according to a new survey. According to a poll conducted by two academic authors and published by The Washington Post, 52 percent of Republicans said they would back a postponement of the next election if Trump called for it. If Trump and congressional Republicans proposed postponing the election to ensure only eligible citizens could vote, support from Republicans rises to 56 percent."

Throw in a financial collapse, major civil disturbances, and/or a significant domestic terror attack (real or "false flag") and expect that number to go closer to 75 percent if not higher.

Does it all smell a little fascistic? You betchya!

Increasingly, though, one really must wonder if the arch-authoritarian racist idiot Donald Trump will make it to 2020. The supreme madness and evil of the rolling atrocity that is the Insane Clown Trump presidency has just now reached a new level of bizarre and scary-weird ruling-class dysfunction. Just last week, the demented, Twitter-addicted brute in the White House engaged in a reckless game of thermonuclear chicken with North Korea's dictator Kin Jong-un. The orange-tinted beast threatened "fire and fury like the world has never seen." Trump's aptly nicknamed war chief Jim "Mad Dog" Mattis threatened "actions that will lead to the end of the [North Korean] regime and destruction of its people."

So what if such outlandish bravado could trigger events leading to the deaths of millions on and around the Korean peninsula? Trump later told reporters that "maybe" his "fiery and fury" statement "wasn't tough enough," Herr Donald threatened "an event the likes of which nobody's ever seen." When asked what he might to do in response to North Korea's defiance, the president said "Well, you'll see, you'll see."

Statements of shock and concern over this Not Normal presidential lunacy came from both sides of the major party aisle. Speaking on CNN, the former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (of whom I am of course no fan) worried (all too reasonably) that Trump's overheated rhetoric could lead the U.S. into war on its own accord. As Clapper told Don Lemon on "CNN Tonight": "I do worry that this game of rhetoric chicken is going to become a self-fulfilling prophecy...It's somewhat reminiscent to me of the history of World War I and how the world kind of blundered into that."

That was no joke.

Then, just as the Clockwork Orangutan seemed ready to radioactively enflame East Asia, Charlottesville happened. Without exactly saying so -- but saying so in "dog whistle" ways clearly understood by his many white-nationalist backers -- Trump showed himself to be on the side of armed white-nationalists and fascists who marched with torches lit chanting "blood and soil" in defense of a statue of the top Confederate (Slave Power) military commander Robert E. Lee. Once again, top talking heads and politicos shook their heads and rolled their eyes over the Not Normal insanity of the President of the United States.

It's not just that the madness of Herr Donald has revolted millions of ordinary citizens and people at home and abroad. His bigger and more relevant problem is that he has significantly alienated a rising share of those atop the nation's unelected and interrelated "deep state" dictatorships of money and empire. Three days ago, the New York Times reported as follows on the "Widen[ing] Rift Between Trump and Business Leaders":

"The chief executive of Walmart, the world's largest retailer, criticized President Trump in front of his 1.5 million American employees, widening a rift between the White House and the business community that has been growing since the weekend's violence in Charlottesville, Va. 'As we watched the events and the response from President Trump over the weekend, we too felt that he missed a critical opportunity to help bring our country together by unequivocally rejecting the appalling actions of white supremacists,' Douglas McMillon, the Walmart C.E.O., wrote in a letter to employees late Monday.

"The rebuke from Mr. McMillon came as six other business leaders stepped down from presidential advisory councils -- including two late on Monday, the C.E.O.s of Intel and Under Armour -- citing their own values as the primary motivation for distancing themselves from Mr. Trump".The departures represent a rare spectacle in which prominent executives are looking for ways to pull back from an American president who campaigned, and won, partly on the strength of his pro-business stance. This has created an unusual calculus: Whether or not to stay on as advisers to a president, a role that traditionally is a coveted position with little to no attendant risk.

"The willingness of [Intel CEO Brian] Krzanich and other C.E.O.s to walk away from the advisory panels highlights an uncomfortable reality for Mr. Trump: He billed himself as the businessman-president, but some executives no longer want to work with him. 'This should be his strong suit: courting C.E.O.s,' said Douglas Brinkley, a presidential historian at Rice University. 'Instead, Trump finds himself with C.E.O.s not wanting to be in a photo op with the president. What should have been an honor has become an albatross.'"

Then there's the military elite. Two days ago, the Los Angeles Times reported on how the heads of the nation's separate military branches were prompted by recent events to take not-so veiled online digs at the orange-tinted, nuke-wielding beast in the White House, who poses as a manly military leader but never served a day in the Armed Services:

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Funny 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Paul Street Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Paul Street ( and is the author of Empire and Inequality: America and the World Since 9/11 (2004), Racial Oppression in the Global Metropolis (2007), Barack Obama and the Future of American Politics (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Could This Be Our Best Hope of Removing Trump From Office?

The World Will Not Mourn the Decline of U.S. Hegemony

A Lesson on Slavery for White America

Trump's Durable Base: Eight Reasons

Someone Tell a Reporter: the Rich are Destroying the Earth

"An Idiot Surrounded by Clowns": Why Trump (Still) Sits in the White House

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: