This is an update. I published the original version of this column just about five years ago (see the end note). Since that time, of course, a minority of voters, through the Electoral College which exists because of the original sin of this nation, the institution of human slavery, elected a peculiar sort of President. Despite the fact that he is totally irreligious himself, like the leadership of the Republican Party since the time of Reagan he supports the policies of the intended religious authoritarianism of the Religious Right. And so, with the otherwise non-religious died-in-the-wool racists, its members form perhaps his most devoted following.
The religious authoritarianism of the Religious Right not only criminalizes the thought as to, say, when life begins, of all other religious people, but of course it also heavily impacts the thoughts and actions of the secular folk among us as well. I am a Secular Humanist Jew. I have much to fear from the Religious Right in this country, especially as their political power is advanced by the Republican Party and its current domination of all three branches of the Federal government (about to get more firmly entrenched with the likely confirmation of the accused sex abuser and likely perjurer Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court).
As I have said numerous times in these pages, the assault on legal abortion goes well beyond the matter of the woman's right to choose (a right in which I firmly believe). It goes to, as I said above, the criminalization of certain beliefs/values of both religious and non-religious persons who do not happen to accept the Religious Right's religious position (and for them it is clearly a religious matter, based either in a particular Biblical interpretation or a papal doctrine) on when life begins.
And so, it is in this context, just after the celebration of Yom Kippur this year (Sept. 18-19) that I once again share these thoughts with you.
On Yom Kippur for Secular Humanist Jews
For Secular Humanist Jews Yom Kippur is not a day of atonement, as it is for theist Jews. We may well have done ethically wrong things in the past year, but we do not regard them as "sins." "Sin" is a religious concept requiring the existence of an unknown, unknowable, and unprovable, yet somehow all-powerful, super-natural being which at some level has control over our lives or parts of them. In contrast, for us Yom Kippur, the most important day in the Jewish calendar, is a day of renewal and rededication. We reflect, we restore, we renew -- we look ahead, not behind.
Before getting on to what I resolved to renew my efforts in dealing with at Yom Kippur, 2013, let me say that as a humanist, an atheist, for my whole life, I am used to be looked down upon (or worse) by theists. Imagine my surprise, then, when I read of what the then new Pope, Francis, had to say about atheists, of which I am surely one, in a lengthy response to a journalist's questions:
"You ask me if the God of the Christians forgives those who don't believe and who don't seek the faith. I start by saying -- and this is the fundamental thing -- that God's mercy has no limits if you go to him with a sincere and contrite heart. The issue for those who do not believe in God is to obey their conscience. Sin, even for those who have no faith, exists when people disobey their conscience [emphasis added]."
Pope Francis: .Atheists are all right!. In various ways the then new pontiff suggests a mind willing to defy convention.
(Image by Aleteia Image Partners) Details DMCA
Even in a column like this one, I have to say "Wow, that is quite a statement," especially coming from a Pope. (One can hardly imagine it coming from any of the lay or clerical leaders of the Republican Religious Right in the United States. Indeed, Francis is a very special Pope.) It did make me return to consider a line of reasoning about religious persons, as contrasted with organized religion, that I have held for quite some time. The Pope made it clear that he does not have a problem with atheists, per se. And so, I would like to make it clear that I do not have a problem with theists, per se. Yes, I do understand and agree with all of the arguments against the existence of an unknown, unknowable and unprovable "God" or "Gods" (think Hinduism, of which there are about 1 billion adherents). But I do think that it is a waste of time to argue against the concept, and worse to make fun of it, that the majority of the world's population, who are theists of one sort or another, hold to.
On Secular Humanism, and Non-Political, and Political Religion
The problem, for atheists/humanists and, at many times in history theists of one sort confronting theists of another sort as well, is Political Religion, like the Catholic Church has been since the time of St. Augustine, if not before, like the Republican/Religious Right (political by definition), like political Islam, like indeed political Orthodox Judaism in modern Israel. Our argument is not, or should not be, with belief and the believers. The struggle of humanists and believers alike who are devoted to the fundamental interests of humanity must be focused not on each other but on our common enemy: those who use religion to advance their own political and economic interests to arrogate to themselves and their patrons resources and the product of economic activity that neither benefit humanity as a whole nor have anything to do with religion. Those resources, as mentioned, are otherwise known variously as "corporatism," the "global economy [privately held]," and capitalism.
Further, humanists and tolerant believers alike must struggle against those believers who would criminalize the thoughts and actions of both religious and non-believers alike over such matters as: when life begins; to whom the civil institution of marriage is to be made available; and which segments of the population may be discriminated against in the public square, by those "religious" who take offense at the others' beliefs and practices. It must be understood by all that over the centuries of human civilization, more of our brethren have been killed in religious wars, or wars waged for "religious" reasons, or in wars in which organized religions have been an ally of one or more of the warring states, than for all of the other causes put together.
In the Second World War, hardly a religious war in the sense that the Crusades or the Catholic/Protestant wars of 16th and 17th century Europe were, nevertheless on the belt buckle of every German Wehrmacht soldier was the slogan (originated by the Prussian Chancellor Otto von Bismarck in the 1880s) "Gott mit Uns" (God [is] with Us). The traditional Japanese religion of ancestor worship, Shinto, was mobilized by the Japanese fascist leadership to help them mobilize the whole population behind the war effort.
The Catholic Church was closely allied with both Benito Mussolini's (Italian) and Francisco Franco's (Spanish) fascist states. Further the Catholic Church in Rome made a pact with the German Nazi government that in return for "leaving the German Catholics alone," the Pope would leave what the Hitlerites were doing, first to the "non-Aryan" German people, and then to the populations of Europe as a whole, alone. In the United States, although one of the most prominent pre-war anti-Semites was a Catholic cleric, Father Charles Coughlin, for the most part it was not like what happened in Europe, especially with the role of the Catholic Church there. But there were the frequent imprecations to God for support in battle and even a popular song that I remember well from my youth during that conflict: "Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition."
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).