Power of Story
Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 4 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 2 (11 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments
Sci Tech

The Monkey Wars: Tennessee's New Monkey Bill Attacks "Controversial Science"

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Tim McGettigan     Permalink
      (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Group(s): , Add to My Group(s)

News 2   Funny 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 4/19/12

Become a Fan
  (15 fans)

And that, I believe is precisely the point. The people who composed the New Monkey Bill, and the spineless governor who stood idly by as it became a law, are intent upon undermining science education. The Old Monkey Bill brazenly trumpeted its anti-scientific objectives where the New Monkey Bill is more subtle. Nevertheless, it is still designed to achieve precisely the same objective: privileging anti-science, and undermining science.

The Monkey Wars persist. May the fittest paradigm survive.

 

Tim McGettigan is a professor of sociology (specializing in Science, Technology and Society) at Colorado State University -- Pueblo.

 

*Complete Text of Tennessee House   Bill  368

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49, Chapter 6, Part 10, relative to teaching scientific subjects in elementary schools.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE:

SECTION 1. Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49, Chapter 6, Part 10, is amended by adding the following as a new, appropriately designated section:  

(a) The general assembly finds that:


(1) An important purpose of science education is to inform students about scientific evidence and to help students develop critical thinking skills necessary to becoming intelligent, productive, and scientifically informed citizens;

 

(2) The teaching of some scientific subjects, including, but not limited to, biological evolution, the chemical origins of life, global warming, and human cloning, can cause controversy; and

 

(3) Some teachers may be unsure of the expectations concerning how they should present information on such subjects.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

News 2   Funny 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/113759974X

Prof Tim teaches sociology at CSU-Pueblo and he writes books about social change, such as... A Formula for Eradicating Racism, http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/113759974X


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Stephen Hawking's God: A Stubbornly Persistent Illusion

Elementary My Dear Watson! The Beauty (and Baloney) of Being Right about Everything

It's Alive!! Ray Kurzweil, AI, and Frankentelligence

Feynman's Cosmic Onion

Many Worlds, but only One Reality: Stephen Hawking and the Determinist Fallacy

Einstein's God is Irrelevant