Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
12 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

What caused the WTC building Collapse

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

On 9/11 we watched in horror as the WTC towers completely collapsed into a pile of rubble. At the time allot of us thought the same thing this news anchor did when we saw it. It seemed deliberate. It was certainly weird. See the clip here..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Yz6XIvBIhY

But in 2004 NIST released their report, on what caused this collapse. It's 10,000 pages long, so if you have nothing to do for the next 6 months you can read it here. http://wtc.nist.gov/reports_october05.htm

There was another skyscraper that completely collapsed on 9/11 as well, one that wasn't hit by a plane. Known as WTC 7 and is pointed to by the so called conspiracy theorists as smoking gun proof of controlled demolitions being used at the WTC. You can see it collapse here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A

Over the years the controversy over what caused building 7 to collapse has raged on. Popular mechanics seems to have been outsourced by the government to give their "official" explanations for what happened on 9/11. But these guys are not experts. And to be fair they admit they don't claim to be experts, they claim they get their information from the so called experts. These popular mechanics explantions for what happened on 9/11 all started with an article they wrote, for the magazine which was turned into a book. The article is here..

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

What allot of people don't know is the the senior reporter for this article was Benjamin Chertoff, you can see his bio here when he appeared on the radio program "coast to coast" in order to reach this "conspiracy crowd".

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/guests/934.html

There is controversy over wether he is related to head of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff. If he is, in a 3rd world country this would be considered government propaganda. I don't know if he is or not. In any case quoting from their article on the cause of collapse of WTC 7...."
Investigators believe the fire was fed by tanks of diesel fuel that many tenants used to run emergency generators. Most tanks throughout the building were fairly small, but a generator on the fifth floor was connected to a large tank in the basement via a pressurized line. Says Sunder: "Our current working hypothesis is that this pressurized line was supplying fuel [to the fire] for a long period of time."

WTC 7 might have withstood the physical damage it received, or the fire that burned for hours, but those combined factors — along with the building's unusual construction — were enough to set off the chain-reaction collapse." You can read it here.. http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=5#wtc7

However this is no longer cited as a "working hypotheis". On Dec 18, 2007 the NIST investagtors held a meeting to discuss the progress and latest updates on their investigation. And the latest hypthesis is that the fuel lines and tanks were not responsible for the initiation of collapse but instead was caused by "normal building fires". According to NIST investigators a 47 story building completely collapsed into a pile of rubble at freefall speed due to normal building fires that lasted no more than 20 minutes at any particular spot. As hard to believe as this might be, you can hear it for yourself. Here is the complete meeting and at the 19:00 mark you can hear this updated hypothesis, and also at the 01:01:00 mark about the fires lasting no more than 20 minutes at any one spot.

http://origin.eastbaymedia.com/~nist/asx/nist-wtc-121807.asx

But also at this meeting was Richard Gage, a representative of an organization known as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth. you can hear him speak at the 01:30:00 mark. He gives another explanation for the collapse. He claimes that "World Trade Center 7's catastrophic structural failure showed every characteristic of explosive, controlled demolition."

His comments were entered into the record...you can read them here.

http://www.ae911truth.org/info/24

So, I ask the reader. Which explanation makes more sense to you?

 

9-11, brought to you by - religious fanaticism.
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Anthrax-The biggest smoking gun of all?

9/11 - Six Years in the Making

What caused the WTC building Collapse

Why You Should Be a 9/11 Truther Even if You Don't Believe the Government Carried Out the Attacks

The Real Reason the CIA Destroyed Interrogation Tapes

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I've got some oceanfront property for sale in ... by Barbara Peterson on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 8:57:48 PM
As an Arizona resident, I have oceanfront property... by Rev. Robert Vinciguerra on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 10:03:22 PM
... and anthropologists and historians look back u... by Mr M on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 10:04:20 PM
Our government continually feeds us half the truth... by Roger on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 10:47:02 PM
I am unclear as to whether you are attributing hum... by Mikael Rudolph on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 11:15:19 PM
Just ask landlord and WTC Towers owner Larry Silve... by Mikael Rudolph on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 11:21:53 PM
While I may not be a structural engineer ~ other t... by tabonsell on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 3:29:09 PM
There are quite a few videos on the net that argua... by Peter Dearman on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 7:02:16 AM
The most telling evidence for me is the cover ups ... by John Hanks on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 8:08:55 PM
Not only is Benjamin Chertoff the nephew of Michae... by Joann on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 11:14:52 PM
I loved the line about how if the U.S. were a thir... by Peter Dearman on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 7:09:21 AM
So if Silverstien told the fire department to &quo... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Jan 9, 2008 at 6:47:04 PM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2014, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum