"We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine; and remember that we are not descended from fearful men. Not from men who feared to write, to speak, to associate, and to defend causes that were for the moment unpopular... We can deny our heritage and our history, but we cannot escape responsibility for the result."
Edward R. Morrow
It is inevitable: sooner or later the Bush Regime
will fall. Perhaps next month; perhaps after the end of the Jeb
Bush Administration in 2016. The essential question is whether it
will take down the rest of us with it.
In the two and a half years that I have co-edited The Crisis
Papers, I have often speculated publicly as to how Bushism
might be overthrown. The operative word here is "might."
Regarding probabilities, I am a pessimist; regarding
possibilities, I am an optimist. And as long as there is a
possibility of avoiding the precipice, that is reason enough for
hope, for rational planning, and for action. Resigned passivity is
not an honorable option.
First the dire probabilities:
The Bush administration is confidently marching toward disaster,
and we are all unwilling passengers on this fool's journey. Bush's
folly, if not diverted, will certainly lead to economic collapse,
international isolation, and dreadful terrorist revenge. Herbert
Stein's law reigns supreme: "That which can not go on forever,
won't." The ingredients of this witch's brew of mischief are many:
the federal deficit and national debt, growing income disparity,
the dissolution of civil liberties and civil rights, foreign wars,
stolen elections, corporate corruption, theocracy and the assault
on science and scholarship, official secrecy and lies.
Because I have recently discussed these malignant conditions at
length (in "Something's
Gotta Give") I will not repeat that effort here. Our focus
will be on possible avenues of reform and restoration. Suffice to
say that the mechanisms that support and sustain the Bushevik
folly are firmly in place: a captive media, limitless financial
resources from corporate sponsors, an intimidated and subservient
bureaucracy, disregard of federal and international law,
unconstrained mendacity, and, worst of all, a passive and gullible
public. Add to that the manifest shortcomings and
disqualifications of The Commander-in-Chief himself: pluperfect
arrogance, a stubborn unwillingness to admit error, and a
disregard of the informed advice of scientists, policy analysts
and intelligence agencies. In short, our President is a perfect
solipsist: all that exists to him is his greed, his
self-importance, and the "wisdom" of
his
infallible gut.
It will take a significant combination of forces
to turn the Ship of State away from this deadly course.
Deliverance. But enough of these probabilities of disaster.
Let's consider next the possibilities of escape - of bringing down
the House of Bush.
For the first two-hundred years of our republic, our government
has, for the most part, been sustained by the people's shared
conviction in and loyalty to the founding political principles of
our nation as articulated in our national charters, The
Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. We have also
nourished what philosopher John Rawls calls
"civic
friendship" -
mutual trust
and respect, tolerance of differences, a sense of safety and
tranquility in each others' company, encouragement of
self-expression and self-fulfillment, and a willingness to settle
our disputes within the context of the rule of law and through the
slow but just processes of a representative government, elected by
a secure ballot.
It was a system that has earned the envy and respect of both free
and oppressed peoples throughout the world.
But now the Bush gang, which perversely calls itself
"conservative," has changed all that. This is a regime that rules
through fear and lies, through secrecy and a casual disregard of
"inconvenient" laws, through a "privatization" and control of the
ballot, and through the willingness of a controlling segment of
the public to believe the lies, to endure impoverishment, a loss
of hope for the future, and the sell-off of the public treasure -
common air and water, and public lands and resources.
We have, in short, fallen upon dreadful times - and yet,
paradoxically, hopeful as well. For a regime based upon fear and
lies is inherently far less secure than a regime based upon shared
conviction of principles, loyalty to institutions, and mutual
trust.
If, contrafactually, I were George Bush and endowed with a modicum
of common sense, I should be very worried. His regime is supported
through fear, falsehood, arrogance and a compliant public. But how
long can the Busheviks withhold from the public the compelling
fact that this public has been had? At the House debate over the
Clinton impeachment, Congressman John Lewis cried out, "beware the
wrath of the American people!" So far, that wrath has been
contained, and presumably George Bush, with his unperturbed
self-assurance, has little doubt that it will continue to be
contained. But "pride goeth before the fall." And never forget:
Bush is dealing with a public that, unlike the unfortunate peoples
of the Soviet Union and elsewhere, knows what it is like to live
in a free and prosperous country.
The role of the media. The lies of the Bush Administration
are promulgated without rebuttal by the mainstream media. For
example, in late October, 2004,
the Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) reported
reported that among Bush voters:
56% believed that experts agreed that Iraq had
WMDs
75% believed that Iraq was either involved in
9/11 or gave substantial support to Al Queda.
58% said that if Iraq did not have WMDs or was not involved with al Qaeda, the US should not have gone to war.
Accordingly, most Bush voters went to the polls
believing demonstrably false information. The only possible source
of that false information was the mainstream media (including
right-wing talk radio and cable TV "news"). Clearly, the media
took no pains to convey correct information to the voters.
Furthermore, if the media had done so, Bush might well have lost
over 5% of his votes, and the election. In short, he owed his
re-election to the failure of the mainstream media to do its job
of reporting the news.
And that's just the beginning. The media further assisted
Bush/Cheney by trumpeting the slander against John Kerry by the
"Swift Boat Veterans for Truth," and by muffling the evidence of
Bush's dereliction of duty to the Texas Air National Guard.
The Bush-friendly connivance of the mainstream media continues to
this day, as
news
of "The Downing Street Memo," with its compelling evidence of
impeachable offenses by the President, remains hidden from the
front pages of the newspapers and is completely absent from the TV
news. So too any journalistic investigation of the integrity of
the 2004 election, despite an abundant and ever-growing fund of
evidence that the election was stolen.
During the past week, following the disclosure of Mark Felt as the
Watergate "Deep Throat," some pundits have asked, "Where is
today's Deep Throat?" To which others have replied, "No, the
question is where are the Woodwards and Bernsteins today?" Both
questions miss the mark. The relevant question is, "where are the
Ben Bradlees and Kathryn Grahams today?" - (i.e., the editor and
publisher of the Washington Post during the Watergate affair). Not
in the "mainstream." The voices of dissent, the remaining
investigative journalists, and the conveyers of accurate
information, are in the still small voice of the independent press
and the internet.
And so, the power of the Presidency has subdued the mainstream
media. Even so, the media has enormous, if unrealized, power over
the Bush regime, for once the demonstrable facts of the Iraq War,
the 9/11 attacks, the economic plunder by the corporations and the
plutocrats, the stolen elections, the starvation of social
services, etc., become known to the public, the Bush
administration is finished, and the Republican party is destined
for another generation in the political wilderness. This is the
sword of Damocles that the media holds over the Bush gang.
It is a weapon that the mainstream media has chosen not to use,
and is unlikely to use as long as its owners remain confined
within the GOP reservation. So it is up to the independent
publishers and the internet. Can they, at long last, get the facts
out to the public? On that question, the future of the Bush
Administration and the Republican party turns - and well they know
it.
Herein is a grave danger to the Busheviks. A regime of lies can
not long endure - especially so in this emerging "information
age." As Bush himself famously observed, "fool me once, shame on --
shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again." And in fact,
the truth is beginning to leak into the public awareness. Those
PIPA statistics concerning the public misunderstanding of the Iraq
war no longer apply, thus the Administration no longer pretends
that Saddam's WMDs and alliance with al Qaeda justifies the war.
Now a majority of the public believes that the Iraq war was a
mistake, and that proportion is increasing, as Bush's approval
ratings continue to plummet.
The credibility of the Bush regime is dissolving, and with it the
regime's scaffolding of lies. Donald Rumsfeld
told us in March, 2003 that "We know where [the WMDs] are.
They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad." Subsequent
searches of that area have exposed that lie. And Dick Cheney
famously proclaimed in August, 2002 that "there is no doubt
that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is
no doubt that he is amassing them to use against our friends,
against our allies, and against us." That sound clip is being
heard ever more frequently. So when Cheney
appears on Larry King Live and says that he is "offended" by
the Amnesty International report on torture, and insists that the
Iraq insurgency is "in its last throes" - well, "fool me once..."
In the Soviet Union the Communist Party owned and controlled the
media and the education system and ruthlessly excluded news and
opinion from "the outside." But it could not suppress The Beatles,
Rock and Roll, FAXes, audio and video tapes, The Voice of America
and the BBC - the youth culture and the nascent information age.
All this, incidentally, before the Internet. So when at last the
peoples of the several republics of the Soviet Union no longer
believed the official lies, it was all over for the Communists.
Now the Bush regime has to contend with all that, plus "the
internets" and the influx of "unofficial" but authentic
information from within and from outside our borders.
Even so, most of the American people simply can't yet get it into
their heads that their President and Vice President, along with
the chief members of the President's Cabinet, are unscrupulous
liars. But the notion is slowly infecting the body politic like a
persistent mind-virus. People hate to discover that they've been
lied to, and will often steadfastly deny that unpleasant truth.
But once they finally acknowledge that they've been conned, then
watch out! "Beware the wrath of the American people!"
The Defection of the Elites:
An astonishing aspect of the past Presidential election, now
largely forgotten, was the desertion of prominent Republicans from
their party - among them, Arianna Huffington, Kevin Philips, John
Dean, "Pete" Peterson, and Senator Jim Jeffords. "Republicans for
Kerry" was a vibrant organization, while "Democrats for Bush" was
a pale shadow.
What motivated these apostate-Republicans? Surely a loyalty to
founding American political principles that trumped party loyalty.
Also a recognition that John Kerry was simply far better qualified
for the awesome responsibilities of the Oval Office. But surely,
among these motives must have been the typical Republican focus on
rational self-interest. How could so many Republicans forget that,
despite constant harassment by the likes of Newt Gingrich and
Richard Mellon Scaife, Bill Clinton managed to preside over the
most prosperous decade in recent American history? And how can any
intelligent and informed capitalist fail to realize that the
course of Bushenomics leads directly to economic ruin? As Stephen
Roach, the chief economist of the Wall Street investment firm,
Morgan Stanley
forecast: America faces "economic armageddon." And even
Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, is telling us that we
simply cannot go on like this.
What keeps the Republicans, and in particular Bush's cash-cows the
"Pioneers" on the GOP reservation? Surely habit, family tradition,
political influence and simple greed. No mystery there. No doubt
fear of retaliation also plays a significant role. But
self-interest?
The steadfast, wealthy GOP supporters are behaving like passengers
who have booked first-class passage on the Titanic, knowing
full-well in advance of the voyage the fate of the ship, but
nonetheless determined to enjoy to the fullest the five-day
passage en route to the iceberg.
Are they really incapable of seeing past the year-end financial
report, or next quarter's earnings in their investment portfolio?
Have they no care for the future of their country, and the
prospects for their children and grandchildren upon whom they are
placing a crushing debt?
Do they believe that the other 98% of the population - the
disappearing middle class and the ever-growing numbers of the poor
- will sit still and endure the exporting of their jobs, the
strangulation of their social services, the lost educational and
career prospects for their children,
the erosion of civil liberties, the sell-off of public lands and
resources?
Do they truly believe that when this all comes crashing down, they
will somehow escape - that when "our" side of the common boat
sinks, "their" side will not follow?
Apparently, for the most part, they simply don't bother to notice
or think about such things. They ignore the handwriting on the
wall: mene, mene tekel opharsin.
"Eat, drink, be merry - for tomorrow we die." "Apres nous le
deluge."
But not all elites are this decadent. George Soros, Warren Buffet,
and other enlightened capitalists fully appreciate that their
fortunes were gained, and may best be sustained, in a just and
cooperative economic scheme which thrives from the investments of
the entrepreneurs, the productivity of the workers, and a secure
and just public sector -- education, law enforcement, courts,
regulation of commerce, the administration of public resources.
This is the proven, liberal, just and prosperous social order
toward which we Americans have aspired throughout our history - an
order that is now being dismantled by the Bush regime, and which
may be abandoned forever unless we resist and overcome.
In this struggle, an alliance with the elites - in commerce, in
finance, in the media, in academia - is essential. It is a
struggle that now transcends political parties, as the so-called
"moderate Republicans" have been supplanted by the religious
fundamentalists and the plutocrats that have captured their party,
and our government.
For once again: the Bush regime is motivated by greed and lust for
power, and it is sustained by corruption, lies, fear and
divisiveness. It replaces a commonwealth based upon mutual trust
and tolerance, upon the just rule of law, and shared loyalty to
high political principles. As corruption is exposed, as lies are
countered by demonstrable truth, as fear is overcome by
resolution, and divisiveness is overcome by a perception of common
purpose, the evil regime collapses.
Battista in Cuba, Marcos in the Philippines, and the Communist
Party of the Soviet Union all appeared to be in firm control,
despite "some internal unrest." But when public outrage overcame
fear, when "people-power" coalesced, all these regimes suddenly
collapsed from a combination public pressure without and the
rottenness within.
Can it happen here? Time will tell - time, and our determination
to expose the lies, spread the truth, overcome our fears, and
apply that essential pressure.
After all, it's our country, not theirs.
Copyright 2005, by Ernest Partridge
Dr. Ernest Partridge is a consultant, writer and lecturer in the
field of Environmental Ethics and Public Policy. He publishes the
website, "The Online Gadfly" (www.igc.org/gadfly) and co-edits the
progressive
website, "The Crisis Papers" (www.crisispapers.org). Send comments
to:
crisispapers@hotmail.com .
Add your comments below
document.write("");Contribute $$ to OpEdNews
