|
Noam Chomsky:
Bush/Kerry Difference Is ‘Large’
Chomsky's Right, Bush Has to Go
by
Michael Leon
OpEdNews.Com
Madison,
Wisconsin--The coalition against
George W. Bush continues to grow.
In an interview
published in The
Guardian last weekend, Noam Chomsky added his voice to those advocating
that Senator John Kerry (D-Massachusetts)
defeat Bush.
Noting that Kerry and
Bush share much in common in representing two factions of the
business party, Chomsky said that differences
do exist: “…And in this system of immense power, small differences can
translate into large outcomes.”
Speaking of the Bush
administration's policies, Chomsky said:
“…The
people around Bush are very deeply committed to dismantling the
achievements of popular struggle through the past century. The prospect of
a government which serves popular interests is being dismantled here. It's
an administration that works, that is devoted, to a narrow sector of
wealth and power, no matter what the cost to the general population. And
that could be extremely dangerous in the not very long run.
“You could see it
clearly in the way they dealt with, what is by common agreement, the major
domestic economic problem coming along, namely the exploding health care
costs. They're traceable to the fact that the US has a highly inefficient
healthcare system - far higher expenditure than other comparable
countries, and not particularly good outcomes. Rather poor, in fact. And
it's because it's privatized.
“So they passed a
huge prescription drug bill, which is primarily a gift to the
pharmaceutical corporations and insurance companies. It's a huge taxpayer
subsidy. They're already wealthy beyond dreams of avarice. And that's
their constituency. And as that continues, with significant domestic
problems ahead, for the general population it's extremely harmful.
“Again there isn't
a great difference, so for maybe 90 percent of the population over the
past 20 years, real income has either stagnated or declined, while for the
top few percent, it's just exploded astronomically. But there are
differences and the present group in power is particularly cruel and
savage in this respect.”
Chomsky Is Right
Again
Bush Must Go
I voted for a
socialist for president in 1992 and for Ralph Nader in 1996 and
2000. But Bush simply needs to be gone. And much of the American left’s assertions
that there are no significant
differences between the policies
of the Democrats and Republicans is a proposition that is simply
unsustainable today with Bush's crew
running things.
At a forum/rally
entitled "Foreign Policy, Iraq
& U.S. Hegemony" in Madison, Wisconsin last weekend,
I asked a panel of activists and a journalist whether they agreed that
Bush had to be defeated, and the response was not heartening.
The
panel was composed of Alexander Cockburn, Jennifer Loewenstein, (Madison-Rafah
Sister City Project), Steve Wagener (Military Families Speak Out - Eau
Claire, Wisconsin) and Rae Vogeler (Madison Area Peace Coalition and the
National Network to End the War Against Iraq).
Questioning
the panel members on a
neglected policy area -- judicial
policy as practiced by Democratic and
Republican administrations -- I asked whether Justice Ruth Bader-Ginsberg
was preferable to Justices
Clarence Thomas and Antonin
Scalia. And, in light of the recently-released papers by the
late Justice Harry Blackmum demonstrating that Roe v. Wade was
almost overturned (the Democratic Senate’s and
a large grass roots movement's
1987 defeat of Robert Bork resulted
in the appointment of Anthony Kennedy
that ultimately saved
Roe by one vote) should not
protecting a woman’s right to choose, and
on that basis alone, result in advocating to
defeat Bush?
In short, no one on
the panel agreed.
I don’t get it.
Real people will suffer under another Bush term, real rights are in
jeopardy. Bush will act to overturn
Roe in a minute if a pro-Roe Supreme Court justice resigns
or dies, and the right
wingers whom Bush is appointing to
the bench are appalling. One can piss on the Democrats all day and be
right, but Bush is qualitatively worse in this respect, and in health
care, education, civil rights, affirmative action and many other areas.
The
case against opposing Bush is becoming sillier by the moment.
Consider Phil Gasper
in CounterPunch
(“Bush v. Bush-lite Chomsky's Lesser-Evilism,” March 20-21, 2004)
reacting to Chomsky’s suggestion in
the The
Guardian that Bush be defeated.
“If we choose
Kerry over Bush, we make it more difficult to do the only thing that ever
makes a difference for our side--building real activism on the ground,” concludes
Gasper.
C’mon, is
advocating the defeat of this right-winger Bush really detracting from
organizing? Bush is appointing activist,
right-wing ideologues to the bench who will shape judicial policy
for decades to come. Should we not stop this? Do you really think John
Kerry will also appoint
right-wing hacks to the bench?
Bush is dangerous, cruel
and savage just as Chomsky contends,
and must be defeated. Vote
Kerry and organize!
Michael
Leon
is a writer living in
Madison
,
Wisconsin
. His writing has appeared nationally in The Progressive, In These Times,
CounterPunch and OpEdNews.com. He
can be reached at: maleon@terracom.net
|