| The DLC (Democratic Leadership Council) flat out sucks. It's been
described as a front for Republicans, Republican's light, Republicans in
Democrat's clothing. They attack candidates, using the same vitriol as
right wing talk radio cretins like Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage and Glen
what's his name.
So what's a party to do? Get rid of them? No... It's free
country. George Bush could even join their little sham Democratic bow wow
party. Replace them? No. They don't want to go away.
There are two ways to deal with them. First, create counter-voices that
stand up to their BS and put out statements that more accurately reflect
the voice of the real democratic party. What is that voice if it's not the
voice of the millions. It is not the voice of a handful of spineless
republican wannabes.
Second, create an alternative to them-- a new organization that offers
people who are disgusted with the DLC's positions-- a chance to have their
ideas spoken.
The fact is, the Republicans have moved so far to the radical,
revolutionary right, in their efforts, now being done in plain open sight,
to re-make America, that the DLC, when it seeks the middle ground, is
really seeking the ground that old-time Republicans took. If you stretch
so far to the right and then find the new middle, then those on the far
right are winning just by influencing you-- if you are a spineless faux
democrat.
The democrats were led by the DLC in the failed mid-term elections.
Gore was persuaded by the DLC to do Gore light. It's time to throw these
loser, fake democrats out of the sphere of influence of the Democratic
party. Even if that doesn't happen, it's likely that they'll get
themselves thrown out. They've been getting uglier and nastier-- as though
their make-up is melting off and underneath they are becoming seen for
what they are ditto-head Republicans Soon enough their real selves will
become so transparent they will be thrown out, or laughed out. I'm sure
Tom DeLay will welcome them. He is probably already good buddies
with them.
Here's what Fred Barnes, executive editor of The Weekly Standard
says about Democrats in his column
in the Weekly Standard''s website:
"Democrats in Disarray. One of the reasons Republican
consultant Bill McInturff of Public Opinion Strategies throws around the
L-word ("Landslide") is the sad state of the Democratic party.
"Never before have we witnessed what's happened since the
[September 11] attack: a sustained, almost two-year period where
Americans have rated the Republican party higher on a thermometer than
the Democratic party," he said. Republican leaders are considerably
more popular than Democrats. Democrats are weak among independent and
swing voters. Only 18 percent of voters in a Public Opinion Strategies
survey are convinced any of the Democratic presidential candidates
"can handle terrorism." And Democrats are conflicted on issue
after issue--war in Iraq, Medicare, taxes, guns.:
Let's give the DLC credit where it is due-- the current lack of vision,
lack of leadership, lack of mission, lack of guts and courage-- let's
attribute all of these failures to the DLC's lack of leadership.
Worse, the DLC is attacking candidates it doesn't like. In today's
Guardian, they report,
"Aides to other candidates have sought to paint Dean's campaign
as 'too extremist', claiming he is 'a George McGovern for the 21st
century'. (McGovern ran against Nixon in 1972 and lost one of the most
one-sided presidential elections in history.) Last month the Democrat
Leadership Council, the Clinton power base, called the former governor
'unelectable'."
They also attack Kucinich's as another who fits their "unelectable
liberal" profile. The truth is that their profile does not work.
That's not surprising. They are not trying to get real democrats elected.
They may cite Clinton, but in many ways, Clinton was more republican than
Nixon.
But to replace the DLC, or even to offer an alternative to the DLC, new
leadership has to emerge, has to define new visions, missions, policies,
platforms. This is a think tank role, or, make that plural, where the need
for progressive think tanks comes in.
We have some. Let's see them get to work offering alternatives to the
DLC's line, alternatives to middle of the road ideas that are really
pulled-to-the-right ideas. The internet is changing the way
elections are fought. Perhaps it's also the place where new ideas will
bubble up and emerge as the shining chargers the left will ride to victory
in 2004.
PS. Here's a potential organization to check out: where
there's an article 21st
Century Democrats Question DLC’s Commitment to Core Democratic Values
Rob Kall rob@opednews.com
is publisher of progressive news and opinion website www.opednews.com and
organizer of cutting edge meetings that bring together world leaders, such
as the Winter Brain Meeting and
the StoryCon
Summit Meeting on the Art, Science and Application of Story. This article is copyright by Rob Kall, but
permission is granted for reprint in print, email, blog, or web media so
long as this credit is attached
Other
writings of Rob Kall |
