Support OpEdNews. Tell  your Favorite newspaper and Progressive Web sites to link to  this Article Contribute $$ to OpEdNews

NEW OpedNews Forums

Click Here to Access Hundreds of Fresh News & Opinion Articles

Advertise in this space

support OpEdNews.com

-Classics of Liberal Thinking
-archives of articles by our
  regular contributors
-Progressive Radio Links
-OpEdNews.Com Site Map

Tell A Friend

 

Guns, Jesus, the Bible, Gays, Oil, Swift Boats and the Wink. (Why Bush Won)

(a Satire by James Boyne)

 
Here's some things that Democratic candidates can do to take the wind out of the sails of the GOP and throw a monkey wrench into the 2008 Republican campaign strategy. These tactics will also explain why Democrats lost. As we found out, once again, the truth doesn’t matter to the GOP. Only winning matters. Issues don’t matter. Policies don’t matter. Only corporate control of our Federal Government matters to the GOP and they will say anything to get control and maintain control.
 
Right now all 2008 potential Democratic nominees should do the following:
 
1. Buy a rifle and go hunting. You don’t have to say you are for or against any kind of gun control. You just have to have a few dozen photos of yourself holding a rifle and hunting. Preferably you should hunt pheasants which is the least objectionable hunting game to animal rights type people. Pheasants, after all are birds that are all jittery and nervous and one can never get close to a pheasant and bond with one. Rarely will a pheasant look you in the eye and chirp “help”, so blowing away a pheasant won’t offend anyone and it will endear you the hunters.
 
Merely having some photos that the TV and newspapers can splash across the screen or page would take away the GOP's scare tactic of making all the Southern and Midwestern gun owners think that democratic candidates would take away their guns. The Democratic candidate should even join the NRA to show how he wants to work with the NRA to make America safe and free. This would throw a small monkey wrench into one of the GOP wedge issues---gun control.
As a matter of fact I would recommend that all 55 million Kerry voters send in $10 to the NRA and become a member, whether you own a gun or not. 55 million new NRA members that were all Democrats would certainly have some clout and the NRA would have to stop endorsing GOP candidates under threat of NOT sending in $10 to renew their membership----money talks.
 
It’s silly to throw away the White House on the basis of whether some nuance of some legislation is deemed to be “gun control”. Having a friendlier stance toward guns and the NRA would also undoubtedly pick up some of the policeman vote since Bush captured a lot of the policeman vote.
 
The GOP would have to find a different wedge issue other than “gun control”.
 
2. Fishing. Might as well lock up the fishing crowd too. Instead of wind surfing the candidate should take up fishing. Fishing is manly, as is hunting. Salt-water fishing could lock up the East Coast, West Coast and Gulf Coast fishermen. Lake and stream fishing would appeal to voters in the mainly Red states so it’s important that the Democratic candidate be photographed fishing in lakes and streams, like Cheney did on occasion.  A tie-in to the environment would have an appeal too. We must protect the environment for the benefit of hunters, fishermen and gun owners. We must protect our wetlands, not for birds, but for people who want to shoot the birds and people who want to fish in the wetlands. Birds don’t vote. Wetlands don’t vote. Pheasants don’t vote.
 
Why give up the White House and the Presidency, arguing over how you are going to take peoples fishing rods away so they can’t fish and take their guns away so they cant hunt. You can’t legislate gun control or protect our streams, forests, and wetlands unless you win the White House. Another great tactic might be to write a few articles for Field & Stream Magazine about your favorite large mouth bass lure or your favorite type of ammo for shooting ducks. It can’t hurt.
 
3. The Bible. Democratic candidates need to recapture Jesus for their own. This should be easy since Jesus was basically quite liberal. I doubt that Jesus would be selling health insurance policies to people over 50 and charging $1500 a month, nor would be charging $350 for an office visit to give a digital rectal exam for prostate cancer. After all, Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead, for free. I bet any hospital today would charge at least $750,000 to raise a person from the dead and the co-pay alone would send you into bankruptcy.
 
So the Democrats need to recapture Jesus. How? Candidates need to buy an old worn Bible and start carrying it around on Sundays. The Bible should have a few post-it notes sticking out of the pages to show that it is used regularly. Candidates should memorize a few short passages, preferably, ones that verify that Jesus was indeed a liberal. Quotes like---Feed the hungry, heal the sick, shelter the homeless, clothe the naked, raise the minimum wage, reduce unemployment to 0%, eliminate the deficit, don’t screw around with Social Security, etc.
 
Right now Jesus is being torn from limb to limb by conservatives who are yanking on His right arm and liberals who are pulling His left arm out of its socket. Democrats need to simply give Jesus a big hug and claim Him as their own----Jesus of Nazareth, Jesus the Progressive, Jesus the Liberal who was betrayed, beaten, flogged, and crucified by the Conservatives of His day.
 
Stay away from the "born again" Christians. They are a lost cause anyway. I've been trying to get "born again" for the past 50 years and I can’t figure out how the hell it is done. I think it is something like being hypnotized---a good hypnotist will tell you that you were hypnotized even if you claim you weren’t hypnotized. I know people that have talked to God, talked to Jesus, heard Jesus talking to them, and had one-on-one private meetings with Jesus. I have even given up drinking and smoking, started going to church regularly, confession, been baptized a second time, and asked Jesus to come into my heart. I've even increased my donation at church services to a sum of money that I thought would entice Jesus to answer me and make me born again. I know some guys that curse, drink, smoke, lie, gamble, and cheat on their wives, and when I meet them at Church services they fold their hands, cast their eyes down in a saintly look, and ask me if I have opened my heart to Jesus yet. My pastor said that I not only had to open my heart to Jesus but I also had to open my wallet to Jesus, and that I could do better, whatever that means.
 
If you monitored President Bush closely during the campaigning you would have noticed that he never ever mentioned neither the word “Jesus” nor the word “Christ”. He never once mentioned the word Catholic, the words Protestant, or Jewish. He never once mentioned that he himself was a Methodist, that is, before he was an Episcopalian, that is, before he was a Presbyterian, that is before he was a Lutheran,  that is, before he was in the National Guard, that is, before he was a heavy drinker. Sounds like a flip-flopper,  if there ever was one, to me. The point is, you just have to be photographed clutching onto that Bible and shaking hands with the pastor at the end of Sunday church services and you will be “in like Flynn” with the Jesus crowd in the Red states.
 
There are lots of progressive, moderate thinking, liberal, and "normal" Christians out there in the world too. The Democratic candidate doesn’t have to appeal to the "rattlesnake worshiping crowd" in Alabama to win over a large majority of Christians.  Actually, I'd give up on the Pentecostal, Fundamentalist, and Evangelical Christians. Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson are probably always going to be Bush voters as are Rev. Jimmy Swaggart, Jim Bakker and Tammy Faye, and that preacher (Ben something) who does the faith healing. (Hey, that would have been a good question for the moderator to have asked during the debates, “Do you, as a Presidential candidate believe in and would you support as a faith-based initiative, the practice of Faith Healing”).
 
At any rate,  I'd concentrate on Catholics and mainline Protestants, and people who don’t go to church and are doomed to go to hell anyway. The problem is getting these groups to vote. People who don’t go to Church and are doomed to go to Hell anyway, know it, and therefore when it comes time to vote just say to themselves, “What the Hell, why should I vote, I’m going to go to Hell anyway”. This is a problem. Catholics can be enticed to vote, especially if Democrats can convince them that missing the vote is like missing Sunday Mass---it’s a Mortal Sin, and if they don’t vote they will be doomed to Hell.
 
It would be good for the Democratic candidate to go to Church every Sunday and have his picture taken with the pastor after Church services. This is important. If you go to Church and no one knows it, it does you no good. Even if only God knows it, it does you no good. It has to be photographed. It has to be on TV or in the newspaper for it to count. If you are a “born again” Christian and only God’s knows it, that won’t get you into the White House. Actually I’d stay away from claiming to be born again. It sounds kind of freaky. Kennedy would have never been elected if he had claimed he was “born again” and that he was speaking and listening to Jesus and God---Catholic Jesus and Catholic God, and that all Protestants would naturally go to hell because they didn’t believe in the one, true Catholic, Pope approved God.
 
Absurd isn’t it? This is why we have separation of Church and State.
 
3. Gays. The next candidate shouldn’t get embroiled in the debate over gay marriage or same sex unions, or sexual orientation. The word S-E-X is a no-no anyway. Kerry made a big mistake when he mentioned the word “lesbian” on national TV, referring to Cheney’s “lesbian” daughter.  Can you imagine how many little old ladies sitting on their couch yelled into their husbands and said, “Harry, come here quick, that guy Kerry just said something about lesbians”?. And Harry would come running into the living room with his can of beer and say, “Yeah Ethel, I heard, I think Kerry’s the one that got that queer daughter that everyone is talking about”, “I don’t know”. “Maybe it’s Bush that has the “funny” daughter.
 
The words gay, lesbian, and sex should never be used. If a candidate must refer to one of these groups they should always just be referred to as individuals, or “all Americans”. People in the heartland of America don’t want to even hear the word “gay” or “homosexual”. They’re still struggling with the word “pregnant” that wasn’t even permitted on TV in the 1950’s and early 1960’s.
 
The word “condom” should never be used either. It conjures up visions of, well, you know, what the condom is used on. I can’t even bring myself to say it. Plus, if you say you are going to give $50 billion to Africa so they can buy a zillion condoms it conjures up visions of, well, you know, zillions of, you know, male biological parts.
 
“Abortion” is another word to stay away from. Democratic candidates need to be ‘Pro-Life” AND “Pro-Choice”. One can be Pro-Life and still want not to give up one’s options, and so therefore be Pro-Choice. It doesn’t matter what you are, as a Democratic candidate, if you don’t  get to the White House.
 
4. Environment:  Alaskans voted for Bush so I imagine they want oil drilling in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge. I’ve never been to Alaska and I don’t plan on ever visiting Alaska . If I do I will probably stay in a Holiday Inn Express and watch TV and never get to see much of Alaska . Besides even if we did drill in Alaska the oil would only last about 50 years and then it would run out and Alaska could get back to being Alaska for the next 10,000 years.
 
The biggest environmental calamity to ever hit Alaska , Canada , and the USA was when there was a “land bridge” from Siberia to Alaska , which allowed cavemen or early humans to cross over onto the North American continent. Nothings ever been the same.
 
If a Democratic candidate wants to appease the energy industry executives the candidate could come out in favor of drilling for more oil in Texas . Texas is already Bush country so what the hell,  we might as well drill away into oblivion in Texas . Besides, Texans don’t care about oil spills or environmental disasters. After all, it’s Texas . It’s oil country. They take pride in drinking water with Mercury in it. If a Democrat ever wins he could set up 5000 oil drilling rigs all over Crawford , Texas and confiscate George Bush’s ranch in a search for oil.
 
5. Negative Ads: Negative advertisements have become an important part of defeating the opposing candidate. This means that the Democrats have to perfect their technique to the extent that the Republicans have mastered the negative ad. The Swift Boat ads were a great example in how to totally destroy the war record of a person who risked his life, won several medals, and came home and risked their reputation to speak out against a war that three Presidents (Johnson, Nixon and Ford) eventually “threw the towel in” anyway, because the American people had had enough. The Swift Boat ads made me feel like we had made a terrible mistake by pulling out of Vietnam and that we should launch a new attack on Vietnam and go back in there and knock a few heads together and kick some butt. I am waiting for President Bush to order some F-115’s to strafe Hanoi and make a preemptive attack on Vietnam and go in and finish the job. I would bet that there are 50,000 terrorists in Vietnam right now that don’t even know that they are terrorists yet. I bet there are 500,000 insurgents in South Vietnam ---just waiting for us. We can get ‘em. I bet they are the folks that want to knock our buildings down.
 
Negative ads work, so Democrats, when they learn who the next GOP nominee will be should immediately launch a massive search for photographs of the opposing candidate showing him as a geek when he was 15 years old. A driving record search is a necessity to see how many times the candidate was caught speeding, not stopping for stop signs, reckless driving, parking in a disabled person parking spot, and honking his horn in a hospital quiet zone.
 
Negative ads are especially effective if you can get someone to cry about how bad the other candidate is. When I saw those 200 Swift Boat Veterans for Truth all lined up and when the TV camera panned over their faces and they all stood there claiming that they had been wronged by Senator Kerry more than 40 years ago it really had an affect on me. They were crying. I started to cry. My whole family was crying. We didn’t know why. We just wanted to cry. Senator Kerry had wronged all these people. What a scoundrel he must be. I didn’t even know that 200 guys could even fit on one Swift Boat and I didn’t know that 200 guys were ever standing on a boat watching Senator Kerry get wounded. What the hell were 200 guys doing just standing around on a Swift Boat watching Kerry get wounded and taking notes so they could give him the royal shaft 40 years later.
 
The good thing about negative ads is that you can lie and it doesn’t matter. The only thing that matters is winning the White House.
 
In four more years there may be 100 million voters begging Senator Kerry to run for President again and get us out of the mess we got ourselves into.
 
6. The Wink: Have you ever noticed how President Bush often winks at people. It’s weird. I always wondered who the hell he was winking at in the crowd. Was it a Secret Service Agent? Was it an old girlfriend from high school? Was it someone who just handed him an envelope with $10,000 in it? Was it someone who was blowing him kisses? When he winks it always makes me feel left out because he is winking at someone he knows and here I am just watching him wink on TV. I always wished that the person who was being winked at would jump up on the stage so I could see him or her.
 
Maybe he is winking a no one. Maybe he just likes to wink because it looks neat. Maybe he just has something caught in his eye. Maybe he has an eye twitch. Who the hell knows. All I know is that Kerry didn’t ever wink---and he lost the election. It makes one wonder about the power of winking. I wonder if Jesus Christ went around giving speeches and winking at people. I wonder if Jesus winked at the Romans when He was up on the Cross. It baffles me. I just don’t get “the winking” thing.
 
I actually can’t stand it when someone winks at me. It’s kind of condescending or patronizing. Whenever I see one person wink at another person I always think that those two people have some special secret between them, and that I am the only person in the world who doesn’t know the secret. I hate winkers. But I guess winking is looked upon favorably in the Deep South and the American Heartland of the Red states because George winked and George won.
 
So my final advice to the Democratic candidate is to practice winking. I never did see President Bush wink at Senator Kerry during the debates but Bush did wink at someone else in the audience. Maybe if Kerry winked he would have won over the winking crowd. You never know. Possibly, Bush and Kerry could have had a winking contest to see who could have outwinked the other. But, then again, winking is certainly Bush’s strong point so it’s just as well that Kerry backed off from the wink.
 
Also, President Bush’s eyes are too close together. He should really get that fixed.
 
James Boyne dboyne@aol.com  

James Boyne is a regular contributor to opednews.com and his other articles can be accessed at Articles by James Boyne

 

NEW!! Add your comments below

 
Enter Your E-mail address to Receive OpEdNews Newsletter Tell A Friend  Contribute $$ to OpEdNews