Keep OpEdNews.com Growing. Contribute

Jump to Our News and Opinion Section

" ...you're doing really great stuff. I'm very impressed with it." Greg Palast      "Something Like the Drudge Report, But Designed For People Who Think" Mike Malloy    "Great stuff. Duly bookmarked ... and thank you for doing this" Antonia Zerbisias      "OpEdNews runs news stories and sharply smart anti-war/anti-Bush opinion pieces"  Ed Weiner of the Philadelphia Daily News   

Add Our FREE  News and Opinion Box to Your Website  NEW OpedNews Forums


 Enter Your E-mail address to Receive OpEdNewsLetter

 Front Page Site Map     Rob's Blog  Support OpEdNews  archives of articles by our regular contributors
Contribute $$ to OpEdNews

Click Here to Access Hundreds of Fresh News & Opinion Articles

Small Poster

Available on posters, tee-shirts, calendars, cups, post-cards

Advertise in this     space         support OpEdNews.com
 
 
-Classics of Liberal Thinking
-archives of articles by our
  regular contributors
-Progressive Radio Links
-OpEdNews.Com Site Map

Support OpEdNews, Buy a Poster or Art Tell A Friend

 

 
Do You Accept Santa Claus As Your Personal Savior?
 
by Michael Arvey
 
Ho, ho, ho, and I'm not invoking Uncle Ho, but that old socialistic, long-haired hippy who, decked out in red, flies without a license and doesn't have a national ID card. Who knows what's in those free boxes, anyway. At the very least, he's a dangerous liberal--who else would dress and look like that?--who gives to the poor as well as to the rich, and to the infirm as well as to the healthy.
 
Santa Claus, arbiter of gifts and justice, is coming to town. Better be nice, better not cry. He sees you when you're sleeping, he knows when you're awake. He's knows if you've been good or bad, so be good for goodness sake! Sound a bit like a Homeland Security agent who can always find you wherever you are?
 
One can't help but notice how Christian fundamentalists often treat God or Jesus as if they're both Santa Claus: "Please Lord, I've been good, bring me this list of things and the help I deserve. And remember God, when I go to war with relatives, friends or other nations, you're on my side." But, notice what Jesus taught, "Your father knoweth what things ye have need of." He doesn't talk about what you want, perhaps because he recognized there is no end to wants. In fact, Psalm 23:1 instructs, "The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want."
 
However, to act kindly or good to get something for yourself is a projection of conditional, egoic consciousness, which bears no resemblance to a spiritual being and to the unconditional selflessness of the Higher Self. Apparently when fundamentalists find their worldly desires have been fulfilled, they believe God must have beneficently smiled down and blessed them through Jesus, the mediator. Strangely, however, once these Christians have accepted Jesus as their savior, they no longer seem to think for themselves, nor do they read and study the Scriptures in a deep way, preferring to listen to someone else's reflective distillation of Biblical writings--easier to bow down to the altar of television, America's favorite false prophet. The faith they speak of and espouse is considered, in some eastern spiritual traditions, simply a by-product of enlightenment, or an immersion in God awareness, rather than being a postmortem stepping-stone to God. And from that state of consciousness, one prays from God, not to God, and those prayers are infused directly with sparkling, divine energy.
 
George W. Bush, for example, is a born-again case in point. Although he claims he's doing everything he can to keep Americans safe, his entire political sub-text is a short-term philosophy: Grab while the grabbing's good. Does the Bible not proclaim that is it better to give than to receive? Bush's faith is entrusted to economic Darwinism, the survival of the richest, and still his flock remain impervious to clear-headedness. Is Bush a bona fide Christian? Regardless how well he plays his facade with his fundamentalist constituency, he's more of a Deuteuronomic (one of the five books of the Pentateuch) Old Testament guy who is, as linguist George Lakoff would describe such men, a strict father figure. Within Bush's and the fundamentalists' point of view live the stock platitudes with which everyone is familiar: Vengeance is mine, just and right is he, father knows best, mothers stay at home, America is the greatest, communism is bad. There are countless other comforting, black and white, absolutist platitudes that earmark this mindset. One can't help suspect that this simplistic black and white framework is the paranoiac source of the Bush administration's watchword "You're either with us or against us"--a rigid distinction that leaves no middle ground. Interestingly, this same friend or foe dichotomy can be located in the dictatorships of Hitler and Stalin.  If Bush knew his Bible, he'd know that his sin, sooner or later, will find him out.
 
The fundies probably fall far short of the example Christ made of his whole life through service and sacrifice for others based on a foundation of love that manifested through his healing, teaching and dying, and through his parables that brimmed with such profundity none of us can ever really grasp their entire breadth and depth, floating down as they do from higher dimensional experience. "But he that is the greatest among you shall be your servant." Matt 23:9. Jesus served and walked with the poor, with sinners, with prostitutes and with the sick, and as a result, Christians were always a minority. Even Jesus could described as a socialist freely giving from the whole of creation that belongs to, and is, God, as some eastern spiritual traditions teach, to those in need or who have little or nothing in the material realm. In addition, Jesus, unlike Bush and his followers, fits Lakoff's model of a nurturer rather than that of a strict father.
 
Jesus the moral Christ would never in all eternity countenance the napalming and nuking with depleted uranium the thousands of innocents in that distant slaughterhouse, Iraq. And the with the love of money being the root of all evil, he would never engineer tax cuts and social security privatization schemes for Pharisaic, rich money-changers. 
 
Certainly, the devil would.
 
Michael Arvey (marvey@email.com) is a free lance writer in Colorado.

Add your comments below

 
Enter Your E-mail address to Receive OpEdNews Newsletter Tell A Friend  Contribute $$ to OpEdNews
Access Amazon From OpEdNews and support Us at no cost to you
Search Now: