OpEdNews Op Eds

it's 3 a.m. -do you know where your candidate is?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

The Clinton campaign released an ad today for airing in states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas -about to go to the polls for their primaries. It opens with an image of children sleeping safely in bed. The camera pans the room, zooms in and out on the faces of these children. The musical theme starts with snare drums and muted trumpet calls that impart a vague though stirring martial sentiment (reminiscent of Jerry Goldsmith's work for the movie, 'Patton') -all the while anxiety builds as a telephone is ringing -and the the sober voice over:
"It's 3:00am and your children are safe and asleep. But there's a phone in the White House, and it's ringing. Something is happening in the world. Your vote will decide who answers that call. Whether it's someone who already knows the world's leaders, knows the military, someone tested and ready to lead in a dangerous world. It's 3am and your children are safe and asleep. Who do you want answering the phone?"
I keep hoping that there's a floor. That the Clinton campaign won't stoop any lower. That there is some hope for a campaign conducted from a place of mutual respect between the rival candidates and some minimal amount of respect for the voters. There have been glimmers -hints of that possibility where the debate or discussion could be about the distinction between two valid candidates and their policy. It was two debates ago when it seemed there might have been an end to the uglier campaigning. Senator Clinton spoke of a sense of feeling "honored" to have campaigned against her opponent. She spoke of her own core convictions and what she saw as her unique qualifications for office, this without denigrating those of Senator Obama. Frankly, it was her strongest moment in the campaign in memory. It didn't last long. Just days later she was literally hollering "shame on you" at her opponent, feigning new shock and surprise at the opposing campaign for pointing up differences that have been at issue for months. In the subsequent debate Senator Clinton was asked to justify and explain her shouts of "shame" and her open mockery of Obama's "hoping for the clouds to part." There was something in there about "the music of heavenly choirs." She blushed as the moderators rolled tape. Her answer then was to shrug it off as "all in good fun." She described the ranting invective and mockery directed at her opponent as a great way to unwind. Still, even that shrugging that night might have given a reasonable person reason to hope. When seated at the same table with Obama, Senator Clinton seemed capable of respect for her opponent. She seemed capable of honoring the the deliberate decision informed voters were being asked to make. She seemed at peace with having made her case. Now this. It was only a little over two years ago when Senator Clinton was reprimanding President Bush for "playing the fear card." It was February 2006 and she spoke to the United Auto Workers convention in Washington.
"Two weeks ago, [White House political director] Karl Rove ... was telling the National Republican Committee 'Here's your game plan, folks, here's how you're gonna win - we're gonna win by getting everybody scared again,'" Clinton said. "This crowd [says] 'All we've got is fear and we are going to keep playing the fear card.'"
Perhaps that's the most disturbing aspect of this latest Clinton campaign maneuver, Senator Hillary Clinton knows better. She's simply not opting for better. She has read what she calls "Karl Rove's playbook" and she's willing to give it a try. As Senator Clinton's ad comes to a close, the telephone stops ringing. Then the most damning aspect of this episode comes through loud and clear. It's Senator Clinton's own voice admitting "that she approved this message."

 

http://www.notsilence.blogspot.com

Tom driscoll is an opinion columnist, poet, performiing songwriter (let's just say he writes).

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What our war makes possible, the next

Small steps on small arms

Dimming the light: what Bhutto said to us

"They pull me back in"

The punishment they seek

Balance Sheet Blues

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

YOU MIGHT BE AN IDIOT:-)If you think Barack Obama ... by jack smith on Saturday, Mar 1, 2008 at 3:12:41 AM
Maybe I am an idiot for thinking the public discou... by Tom Driscoll on Saturday, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:37:24 AM
Hillary is desperate.  She geared up early fo... by Bill Samuel on Saturday, Mar 1, 2008 at 10:51:19 AM
HRC's problem from Day 1 of the campaign was h... by Mad Jayhawk on Saturday, Mar 1, 2008 at 11:52:55 AM
According to Jack Smith, there must be a remarkabl... by gen_dig on Saturday, Mar 1, 2008 at 3:06:15 PM