Tags for This Article:

USA United States Of America (7178)  War Iraq (1006)  Bush War Strategery (829)  Media Mainstream MSM (687)  War Lies To Start War (453)  Media Newspapers (289)  National Security (277)  Intelligence Failures (136)  US Midwest (111)  US Northeast (99)  US South (86)  US Southeast (85)  US Northwest (80)  US Southwest (79)  US Waters (39) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
February 10, 2007 at 14:25:41

View Ratings | Rate It

Reports of Intelligence Failures are Fallacious

by thomas bonsell     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

Americans should be getting weary of most of the "mainstream media" constantly claiming the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York City and on the Pentagon in Viginia and the United States invasion of Iraq were the results of "intelligence failures." There were no "intelligence failures" concerning either. I repeat; there were no "intelligence failures".

Several agents in the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had uncovered suspicious behavior by suspected Muslim radicals prior to 9/11 but their reports to supervisors were ignored. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) warned the White House six weeks before 9/11 that radical Muslims were planning to hijack aircraft in the US and use them as weapons. That warning was ignored.



The US unsuccessfully tried to condemn confessed alQaeda member Zacarias Moussaoui to death, claiming he could have prevented the 9/11 attacks by telling what he knew of the planning. But President George Bush just as easily might have prevented the attacks had he alerted airline and airport security of the 9/11 warnings he received as well as the Federal Aviation Administration, and had he required the FBI to reveal what it knew. He did nothing, and that wasn't an "intelligence failure".

We had an informant in Osama bin Laden's alQaeda network but he was "outed" by the Bush administration that wanted to make political points by bragging about its "successes."

Intelligence on Iraq was ignored and distorted. There were many agents and analysts in all intelligence agencies telling the administration that Iraq had no involvement in the 9/11 attacks and it had no forbidden weapons or that claims it did have such weapons were highly suspect and not trustworthy. They were ignored. We had a source in Saddam Hussein's inner circle appraising us of Iraq's weapons capabilities. He was ignored. Iraqi defectors had told us that Hussein had shed himself of forbidden weapons after the Gulf War of 1991. They were ignored even though they were Hussein's sons in law and had controlled his weapons programs.

As the Hussein regime was being toppled, not one US unit--nor even a single soldier--was detailed to secure the weapons sites US officials claimed were housing forbidden weapons. Such lack of action proves that administration planners knew there were no forbidden weapons which refutes any claim of "intelligence failure".

The United States had long had the best intelligence in the world. The Bush administration recently revealed what had long been classified; that 100,000 agents are employed in US intelligence and the nation spends $44 billion annually on operations. Add to that the spending and personnel in Air Force, Army and Navy intelligence operations and the spending and personnel in other departments outside the Defense Department. The US spends the most of any nation in the world on intelligence; has the most personnel; the best-trained and best-educated agents and analysts; the best equipment; most outposts in the best locations on foreign soil, on the oceans or in the air, and a rarely publicized assent few other nations could claim. The United States had long been the most-admired nation in the world which enabled it to recruit informants in other nations to provide information to the US while having few Americans giving information to our adversaries.

The CIA was monitoring Iran's nuclear-research program but that was destroyed after the Bush administration identified the CIA agent who headed the operation because it sought political revenge against the agent's husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, because he told the truth about administration claims. Whatever happened to the Iranians who were cooperating with the US is unknown.

And the effect will last for years. Who in Iran, China, North Korea, Syria, Palestine, Cuba or any other hostile nation will dare cooperate with US intelligence if there is a chance the Bush administration would reveal their identities for political reasons as it did with the Iraqi and alQaeda insiders?

The recent "resignation" of Porter Goss as director of the CIA has revealed that US intelligence capabilities have been severely damaged almost to the point of being in shambles by an administration that has purged or forced the departure of veteran agents and analysts who told Bush what he didn't want to hear. Blaming "intelligence failures" and establishing the Homeland Security Department, a monument of ineptitude and inability, are ruses to cover up the incompetence and worthlessness of Bush and his administration as protectors of the nation.

A recent story in the New York Times reported that lower-level agents at the CIA had begun referring to Vice President Dick Cheney as "Edgar", alluding to famed ventiloquist Edgar Bergen, and equating President George Bush to Bergen's puppet Charlie McCarthy. Such an equation is disparaging and insulting to a great American and unquestioned naional asset whose character and integrity is beyond reproach. Bush is nothing like Charley McCarthy, he's more a Mortimer Snerd.

I will repeat myself: There were no "intelligence failures" contributing to either the 9/11 attacks nor the war against Iraq. The mainstream media, which have seemingly anointed themselves the George Bush Mutual Protection Society, would do the nation well to cease repeating this falsehood.

*****************************************

 

***************************************************** Thomas Bonsell is a former newspaper editor (in Oregon, New York and Colorado) United States Air Force cryptanalyst and National Security Agency intelligence agent. He became one of American journalism's leading constitutional experts through years of study at Georgetown University Graduate School of Government in Washington, D.C., and tries (without much success) to be patient with people who argue endlessly on subjects they have never studied. He is the author of "The Un-Americans: Trashing of the United States Constitution in the American Press", a critique of the mainstream media for ignorance of, or disdain for, our constitutional principles of self-government. He left newspaper work years ago, disgusted at the direction the Fourth Estate ~ under the mismanagement of ineffectual, out-of-touch, can't-do executives ~ was taking away from honest responsible journalism and the observation that there was no place in the mainstream media for a progressive, or liberal, constitutional "expert". Bonsell is an honors graduate of Woodbury College (Los Angeles, California) with a bachelor of business administration degree. He is profiled in Marquis Who's Who in America. (Self-portrait, above, was handled to make author/artist appear prettier than he actually is.) Personal motto: Have brain; will use.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments

veteran, teacher, peace activist
Ramon Pugaveteran, teacher, peace activist

Smokescreen of intelligence failure

Not only the administration, but the congress has used the intelligence community as a smokescreen to hide their collusion in supporting this preemptive war. My senator Clinton gives the lame excuse "If I knew then what I know now". She damm well knew then as she stated in her senate speech preceeding her war authorization vote. She gave all the reasons not to support the war and then proceeded to vote for it anyway. She now supports preemptive military action against Iran to appease her Jewish supporters. Where is her allegiance to the future of our nation for this wannabe president?

by Ramon Puga (5 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 30 comments) on Thursday, February 15, 2007 at 6:51:25 PM
 

 

1 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

NEW IDEAS ON RESTORING U. S. ECONOMY, for the Next Secretary of Commerce, William Blaine Richardson III by Stephen Fox

Detroit vs. Wall Street: The Trillion Dollar Class War by Cameron Salisbury

Saving the Big 3 for You and Me ...a message from Michael Moore by Michael Moore

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

Credit Card Crisis Is Here / Derivatives Next by Allen L Roland

No Bailout Oversight: Bush Stalls Inspector General Selection by Allen L Roland

End of the Road to Moronity by Rand Clifford

Paulson shoots another arrow into the heart of the Economy by Andrew Hughes

Leading lives of quiet desperation this holiday season by Sheryl Letzgus McGinnis

For the GOP, the Economic Meltdown May Have Happened Just a Wee Bit Early by Bernard Weiner

Go To Top 50 Most Popular