Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

HAVA and HR 811 - Voting Machines' Impact on Minority Communities

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

HAVA and HR811 --

Voting Machines’ Impact on Minority Communities

Report by Teresa Hommel

Chair, Task Force on Election Integrity, Community Church of NY

3/30/07

The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) required all states to provide voting devices in each poll site to enable voters with disabilities to vote privately and independently, and authorized the use of federal monies for states to purchase new equipment.

HAVA money has been used to purchase two kinds of new systems:

  • Paper ballot voting systems, consisting of paper ballots, optical scanners, and accessible ballot marking devices, or
  • Electronic voting machines, known as touchscreens or DREs (Direct Recording Electronic machines).

 

HAVA spurred a nationwide grassroots election integrity movement to fight the use of DREs because DREs conceal vote-handling, insider tampering, outsider hacking, as well as innocent errors. DREs shut out the community and prevent citizens from participating in election procedures. No one can witness, understand, or attest to the honesty of vote-handling and vote-counting that take place inside DREs.

Problems with DREs have had a greater impact on minorities. For example, when New Mexico switched from DREs to paper ballots in 2006, minority undervote rates plummeted as much as 85%.[1]

1. Evidence now shows that DREs are capable of ethnic profiling when voters select a non-English language for the display of their ballot on the touchscreen, and DREs may lose the votes intended to be cast on such ballots.[2]

2, DREs have proven to be unmanageable for many poll workers, voters, and elections staff, which means that voters can’t vote because no one can make the DRE voting machines work.[3]

3.This is in addition to disenfranchisement caused by malfunctions, failures, and long waiting lines due to insufficient equipment. Federal standards allow DREs to have a 9.2% failure rate.[4]

4. DREs are intimidating and confusing for the elderly and non-computer-users.

5. With or without a voter-verified paper trail, DREs prevent voters from knowing whether their votes have been correctly recorded and counted. This is because the touchscreen display and the paper trail, both of which voters can verify, can be different from the invisible, unverifiable votes electronically-recorded inside the computer, which are used to determine election tallies.[5] Thus, DREs increase voter cynicism and discourage people from voting.

HR811, the Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2007, was a shock to grassroots election integrity activists, especially those of us who lobbied for previous versions of the bill. Several lists of problems and amendments have been submitted to Congress.[6]

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Teresa Hommel is a voting activist in NY and chair of the Task Force On Voting Integrity, Community Church of New York.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

HR 811 by Guitar Chris on Tuesday, Apr 3, 2007 at 3:38:20 AM
MARYLAND JUST PASSED A BILL MANDATING OPTICAL SCAN by Arlene montemarano on Thursday, Apr 12, 2007 at 7:06:59 AM
GREAT ARTICLE by Arlene montemarano on Thursday, Apr 12, 2007 at 7:09:24 AM