Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
April 1, 2007 at 00:15:51

View Ratings | Rate It

HAVA and HR 811 - Voting Machines' Impact on Minority Communities

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Teresa Hommel (about the author)     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Teresa Hommel - Writer

HAVA and HR811 --

Voting Machines’ Impact on Minority Communities

Report by Teresa Hommel

Chair, Task Force on Election Integrity, Community Church of NY

3/30/07

The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) required all states to provide voting devices in each poll site to enable voters with disabilities to vote privately and independently, and authorized the use of federal monies for states to purchase new equipment.

HAVA money has been used to purchase two kinds of new systems:

  • Paper ballot voting systems, consisting of paper ballots, optical scanners, and accessible ballot marking devices, or
  • Electronic voting machines, known as touchscreens or DREs (Direct Recording Electronic machines).

 

HAVA spurred a nationwide grassroots election integrity movement to fight the use of DREs because DREs conceal vote-handling, insider tampering, outsider hacking, as well as innocent errors. DREs shut out the community and prevent citizens from participating in election procedures. No one can witness, understand, or attest to the honesty of vote-handling and vote-counting that take place inside DREs.

Problems with DREs have had a greater impact on minorities. For example, when New Mexico switched from DREs to paper ballots in 2006, minority undervote rates plummeted as much as 85%.[1]

1. Evidence now shows that DREs are capable of ethnic profiling when voters select a non-English language for the display of their ballot on the touchscreen, and DREs may lose the votes intended to be cast on such ballots.[2]

2, DREs have proven to be unmanageable for many poll workers, voters, and elections staff, which means that voters can’t vote because no one can make the DRE voting machines work.[3]

3.This is in addition to disenfranchisement caused by malfunctions, failures, and long waiting lines due to insufficient equipment. Federal standards allow DREs to have a 9.2% failure rate.[4]

4. DREs are intimidating and confusing for the elderly and non-computer-users.

5. With or without a voter-verified paper trail, DREs prevent voters from knowing whether their votes have been correctly recorded and counted. This is because the touchscreen display and the paper trail, both of which voters can verify, can be different from the invisible, unverifiable votes electronically-recorded inside the computer, which are used to determine election tallies.[5] Thus, DREs increase voter cynicism and discourage people from voting.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Teresa Hommel is a voting activist in NY and chair of the Task Force On Voting Integrity, Community Church of New York.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Congress 110th"
Politics in America 2008: The 110th Congress (Politics in America)
by Jackie Koszczuk and Martha Angle

$85.00
Lowest New Price $75.33

Number of pages: 1224
Publisher: CQ Press

CQ Almanac 2008: 110th Congress 2nd Session

$499.00

Number of pages: 624
Publisher: Congressional Quarterly Books

Healthcare in the 110th Congress.(Washington report): An article from: Medical Laboratory Observer
by Donald F. Lavanty

$9.95

Number of pages: 3
Publisher: Thomson Gale

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

HR 811 by GitarChris on Tuesday, Apr 3, 2007 at 3:38:20 AM
MARYLAND JUST PASSED A BILL MANDATING OPTICAL SCAN by Arlene montemarano on Thursday, Apr 12, 2007 at 7:06:59 AM
GREAT ARTICLE by Arlene montemarano on Thursday, Apr 12, 2007 at 7:09:24 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum