Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
June 29, 2007 at 08:51:09

View Ratings | Rate It

Bush and God: How Bush's Faith-Based Foreign Policy Undermined America

by Scott O'Reilly     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

George W. Bush is a failed president. Most historians, political observers, and the public agree on this point. Only an extraordinary turn of events – a successful military venture against Iran, which somehow undoes the damage the invasion of Iraq has wrought, for instance – will lessen the harsh verdict that awaits the Bush when the dust settles on the remains of his presidency. How did it all go so wrong? Bush’s deluded sense of grandeur -- a messianic complex that imprudently blended the president’s faith with statecraft – is at the heart if his (and alas America’s) undoing.

A 19th century philosopher by the name of William Clifford designed an ethical thought experiment that captured the fatal flaw that has sunk the Bush Administration. Clifford asks his readers to imagine a shipowner who decides to forgo a costly inspection because he has faith that Providence will see his ship through a difficult journey. Here Clifford argues, the shipowner acquired his belief not through patient examination, but by stifling his doubts. The sincerity of the owner’s beliefs in no way absolves him if the craft sinks. Indeed, Clifford concludes, substituting blind faith for practical measures is an abdication of responsibility.

Clifford’s thought experiment neatly encapsulates the Bush Administration’s tragic venture in Iraq. Patient inquiry, rational deliberation, and empirical evidence were cast aside in favor of Bush’s ideology and his intuition. Senator Joseph Biden once asked Bush how he could be so certain invading Iraq was the right course. “My instincts,” the president replied, “my instincts.”

Bush is – or at least was – the de facto leader of the religious right. He has intimated to his followers that he believed God wanted him to be president. He also expressed the hope that he would be a good messenger as he brought democracy to the Arab world beginning with Iraq. But like Abner Hale, the insufferably obtuse preacher in James Michner’s novel Hawaii, who sought to bring the heathen natives around to Christianity, but instead brought only pestilence and grief, Bush’s missionary efforts in Iraq have only succeeded in alienating the Arab world.

The notion that the United States has a messianic mission to spread American values across the globe is not something Bush invented. American exceptionalism a part of who we are (we are the last best hope of mankind, the indispensable nation, the shining city upon the hill). But America’s wisest leaders – especially America’s Founders – have consistently rejected the idea that any political leader exercises his earthly authority on behalf of God. Sovereignty, as the Washington, Jefferson, and Madison intended, is derived entirely from “We the People.”

The United States was founded by children of the Enlightenment, a movement that explicitly rejected the idea of the divine right of kings. Put simply, men who believed they were acting as “Fate’s Lieutenant,” in Melville’s memorable phrase, were anathema to the Founding Fathers. However, this is precisely the role Bush cast himself in so far as he has claimed virtually unlimited authority to rid the world of evil. Like captain Ahab, however, Bush’s quest to end evil is spawning the very wickedness, malevolence, and chaos he decries. Melville’s verdict on Ahab, for instance, was that he succeeded only in creating more orphans, a judgment that seems eerily appropriate for Bush considering the way the invasion of Iraq is playing out.

The problem, of course, is not Bush’s goals -- an end to terror and a more hopeful and peaceful Middle East -- but rather his tragic failure to match means and ends. The available evidence indicates that Bush earnestly believes that history is a conflict between the forces of freedom and the forces of tyranny and that God is not neutral in this eternal struggle. In one of his Biblical allusions, for instance, Bush invoked the image of an angel in the whirlwind that directs the storm.

There is nothing more painful than false belief. I expect many of Bush’s followers, who found Bush’s biblically inspired language and outlook so inspiring (at least during the early stages of the invasion) will grow increasingly demoralized as the self-defeating futility of the Iraq war becomes more apparent. Put simply, the notion that the war on terror and the invasion of Iraq (or any other conflict for that matter) are part of some providential plan is superstitious nonsense.

Those who are well versed in history, literature, and political philosophy were more apt to recognize Bush’s religious hubris as a disaster in the making. Shortly after the Supreme Court installed Bush as president over the wishes of the majority, for instance, I wrote that the political gods often elevate fools and rogues because they love watching tragedy and farce.

The Bush Administration has provided plenty of tragedy and farce, but those waiting for a deus ex machina when it comes to Iraq are almost certain to be disappointed. Iraq was a manmade fiasco and it is the height of irresponsibility to believe a deity or fate will sort things out. It is important to recognize, however, how religious zealotry mucked up Iraq. For instance, it is now clear that the administration applied an anti-abortion litmus test that screened out competent diplomats in favor of political stoolies that would be responsible for reconstructing Iraq. It is also obvious that impressionable young soldiers believed they were part of a holy crusade. And it is also clear that a large percentage of the American public believed that Bush’s invasion of Iraq was the fulfillment of biblical prophecy involving the fall of Babylon.

The widespread corruption that permeated the reconstruction efforts, the torture and sexual abuse scandals, and the general incompetence of the Bush Administration belie the notion that Bush is governing as God’s representative on earth. The Founders established a contrary principle for understanding the intersection of religion and state. They didn’t believe that God ordained particular leaders, but they believed that all men are endowed by their creator with inalienable natural rights.

Dick Cheney once implied that America’s preeminence was part of God’s plan.

A Christmas card sent to supporters in 2003, for instance, read: “And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid?”

The invasion of Iraq, however, has precipitated a broad American decline; America’s moral standing, credibility, military readiness, and soft power have all plummeted under Bush/Cheney. Worse still, the defining act of the act of the Bush Administration – the invasion of Iraq – has inadvertently backfired to the advantage of America’s enemies, al-Qaeda and the mullahs in Iran. If this isn’t a reductio ad absurdum to the idea that God wanted Bush to be president I don’t know what is. It seems clear that so long as Bush and Cheney believe they are on a mission from God the United States doesn’t have a prayer.

 

neuroscott.blogspot.com

About the Author -- Scott D. O'Reilly is an independent writer with degrees in philosophy and psychology. His work has been published in The Humanist, Philosophy Now, Intervention Magazine, Think, and The Philosopher's Magazine. He is a (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Bush Failed Policy"
A Bird in the Bush: Failed Domestic Policies of the George W. Bush Administration
by Dowling Campbell

$29.95

Number of pages: 228
Publisher: Algora Publishing

Empty promises: Why the Bush administration's half-hearted attempts at defense reform have failed (Policy analysis)
by David Isenberg


Number of pages: 19
Publisher: Cato Institute

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 comments


Please Don't....

Please don't lump all Christians in with the Bush camp.

Many of us despise Bush and recognize that his brand of Christianity is only

lip service. Faith based on intelligence is one thing, blind faith is another.

Bush is just a puppet anyways, albeit a dangerous one.

by Bob Gormley (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 1094 comments [65 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jun 29, 2007 at 9:29:54 AM

Recommend  (0+)

Reply: Wow, the mirror to your comment is

Please don't lump all Islamist's in the same boat....


However, I think most Christians DO support Bush, and they support Bush unconditionally.

------------------------

The paragraph from the editorial....

"A 19th century philosopher by the name of William Clifford designed an ethical thought experiment that captured the fatal flaw that has sunk the Bush Administration. Clifford asks his readers to imagine a shipowner who decides to forgo a costly inspection because he has faith that Providence will see his ship through a difficult journey. Here Clifford argues, the shipowner acquired his belief not through patient examination, but by stifling his doubts. The sincerity of the owner’s beliefs in no way absolves him if the craft sinks. Indeed, Clifford concludes, substituting blind faith for practical measures is an abdication of responsibility." 

--------------------------------------------------

.....captures brilliantly for me Mr. Bush's thought processes.

by Alessandro Machi (13 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 174 comments) on Friday, Jun 29, 2007 at 11:17:30 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Delusion

Bush's deluded sense of grandeur has become inherit in the American mindset. The American public truly believes that with God on our side America will always be victorious, if we are not it is because of the pro-gay, abortionist. We refuse to accept that God will one day judge America for its consumerism that deplets the environment of resources, materialsim that denys that spiritual reality, and militarism forces our will upon other nations.

by wanderinwoodsman (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 2 comments) on Friday, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:31:34 AM

Recommend  (0+)

More than the WAR.

I want to see it stop too.

I want more.

I am SICK of the American people being used as "useful idiots" , manipulated by BOTH parties.  They constantly dip out of the same cup and present us with "choices" from the same pot of swill. (sigh!)

I am voting against the WAR.  We Democrats got in last election and consequently FUNDED the surge. Good Lord! Nancy Pelosi even tabled the Bush impeachment initiative (but it's still ALIVE!) I don't trust ANY of them!

I want us OUT of Iraq. I want our Country to stop doing the bidding of Big Business married to Big Government.

Stop being a good Democrat.  Stop being a good Republican. Start being a good American.

I'm voting to get out of Iraq and Israel and the whole damn Middle East.

I'm voting to get out of Korea.

I'm voting to get out of NATO.

I'm voting to bring ALL our troops home and protect our own borders and stop the stampede. Our country is going BROKE and we can't afford this.

I'm voting for Ron Paul whose been against this thing from the very start, and against alot of other things as well.  The media (corporate) will try and paint him as a racist or a kook but just do your OWN homework.

Nobody explains Ron Paul better than Ron himself. Do your own homework. You can listen here (thank God they can't control the internet...YET!)

www.ronpaulaudio.com

 

by goldenequity (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 17 comments) on Friday, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:41:26 AM

Recommend  (0+)

Excellent piece Scott

You placed Bush's lack of concern for facts and realities in his pursuit of world domination in perfect context. Unfortunately, much of the American public will never get to hear these points made so clearly, because they are either completely uninformed and disinterested, or they are misinformed by the likes of Fox “news”. 

by John R Moffett (89 articles, 18 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 697 comments [14 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:49:17 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Until Americans

recognize the simple fact that they are not exceptional but are the same as everyone else they will be lead and killed by Bush or someone like him. It is absolutely essential to recognize  that simple premise and boy, it seems so difficult for our good folks to grasp it.

by Mark Sashine (72 articles, 19 quicklinks, 269 diaries, 4101 comments [131 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jun 29, 2007 at 1:35:09 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Reply: Americans

are not the same as everyone else: we are fatter, not as good in math and science, linguistically challenged, more naive (especially politically), and more arrogant (except maybe the French). But we do make a damned fine pizza.

by Blue Pilgrim (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 997 comments) on Friday, Jun 29, 2007 at 4:59:12 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Reply: Hey, wait a minute!

The United States wins the WORLD SERIES every year, explain that one!

(ha ha ha).

by Alessandro Machi (13 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 174 comments) on Saturday, Jun 30, 2007 at 2:22:00 AM

Recommend  (0+)

Re: Bush

At the heart of the support for Bush's war is the deep desire to feel significant or at least flattered. Along side this deep desire is a deep denial of the truth regarding the effects of our invasion. They seem to go hand in hand.

This is why undoing Bush's remaining support is very difficult. We have to tell people that they are not as good as they want to see themselves--this touches on the theme of American exceptionalism. The Iraq war has become a vehicle by which some are trying to prove themselves. The longer we are there, the more likely it is that the Iraqis will grow to love us is the thinking of some.

Is wanting to be reognized the main issue for Bush or is it  the desires of the corporate puppet masters? Even if the latter provides the driving force for Bush, the former is used to make Bush believe that his policies are morally acceptable to the masses.

by Curt Day (49 articles, 5 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 41 comments) on Friday, Jun 29, 2007 at 2:06:16 PM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter

REPORTING FROM HONDURAS: Hondurans Call Out for Help from the International Community by Medea Benjamin

Obama Has No Legal Authority For Afghan War by Sherwood Ross

Italy to Declare Independence from U.S. Military by David Swanson

Tampa, FL - UnitedHealth to Enter Funeral Parlor Industry by James Dunham

Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney

A Not-So-Glorious Fourth Posted by Josh Mitteldorf

Did Obama Appoint People With Track Record of Making Right Decisions? by Ralph Nader

The true face of politics as 467,000 jobs were shed by Mary MacElveen

Israeli Embassy Correspondence Concerning Spirit of Humanity Capture Clarifies Centuries of Conflict by Meryl Ann Butler

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum