Tags for This Article:

McCain-John (918)  Barack Obama (769)  Hillary Clinton (482)  Presidential Campaign (437)  Dirty Tricks (113) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
March 6, 2008 at 20:25:27

No "Never-been" Presidential Candidate Has "Red Phone" Experience

by Sandy Sand     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

Unfortunately, red-phone-answering is called on-the-job-training.

That is unless the candidate went to the AT&T store or Target and bought a 'red phone', but that doesn't count as experience in answering the dreaded "red phone" at three o'clock in the morning, or at any o'clock.

A governor might be able to get away with saying he has experience in dire situations, but those don't include one country going to war with another country, nor does it cover a national security threat.

Governors deal with natural disasters, but if a state's security is threatened by out-of-country or home-grown terrorists, the first thing he does is pick up his "red phone" and call the president.

It's like parenting.  No amount of baby sitting or tending younger siblings qualifies anyone to be a parent for the first time.

The only possible exception to the "previous president" rule might some like Gen. Wesley Clark who commanded NATO forces, or Bill Richardson who was an ambassador who faced many sticky situation.  But generals and ambassadors act under orders from the president, they don't act on their own authority.

Enough of the canard coming from each candidate that he or she has the experience to deal with a phoned in dire threat to the nation.

None of you do. 

Not you, John "W." McCain who spent five years in a Vietnamese prison camp.  All that taught you was how to survive being a prisoner of war.  Not one second that you spent in that house of horrors, isolated from the world taught you a thing about red phone-answering, or keeping us out of war, or protecting us from the 'red menace.'  You are nothing more than a clone of Bush, and we all know how well that went.  You don't have the judgement to disassociate yourself from him, and all we'll get from you is more of the same-old, same-old.

Not you, Hillary Clinton.  Sleeping next to the president for eight years, and eavesdropping on his phone calls doesn't qualify you to pick up the red phone, either.  You never did it yourself.  You didn't make the decisions of what to do or what not to do; the final decision was Bill's.

If sleeping next to someone for eight years qualifies someone to fill a husband or wife's shoes, then Mrs. Doctor Jones can yank an appendix, or Mr. Attorney Smith can stand before the Supreme Court and argue cases.

You, Hillary, don't seem to have any more judgement than Johnny "W" McC.  You didn't have the judgement to vote "no" on giving Bush permission to go to war against Iraq.  You didn't have the judgement to plan ahead and consider that you might have a rival in the form of Barack Obama or anyone else.  You didn't have the judgement or foresight to not keep complimenting Johnny "W" McC, which his campaign will use against you if you're the Democratic nominee.  Your lack of judgement and decision to go negative against Obama is appalling.  Your decision to adopt the Rove playbook of dirty tricks is truly despicable.  You're beginning to sound more and more like Joe Lieberman.

Not you, Barack Obama, but of all three, you seem to be the only one with any judgement at all. 

You are the only one who stood alone in 2002 and said "no" to invading Iraq when it was a very unpopular thing to do.  To your credit, you've stuck with you decision to not go negative all over Hillary.  You answer all of her charges immediately, and always come back with a sound response. Nothing in your life that I know of, except for seeming good judgement and good decision making, qualifies you to pick up the red phone, although of the other two candidates, I think I trust you the most to think on your feet, call in the right advisors and do the right thing.  Hillary next, but less and less with each dumb move she makes.  Johnny "W. More W." McC, not one bit.

 

Sandy Sand began her writing career while raising three children and doing public relations work for Women's American ORT (Organization for Rehabilitation through Training). That led to a job as a reporter for the San Fernando Valley Chronicle, a weekly publication in Canoga Park, California. In conjunction with the Chronicle, she broadcast a tri-weekly, ten minuted newscast for KGOE AM. Following the closure of the Chronicle, Sand became the editor of the Tolucan Times and Canyon Crier newspapers in Burbank. She is currently a guest columnist for the Los Angeles Daily News and contributor to ronkayela.com

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 comments

Harpist, unemployed blue collar worker, and Bush basher living deep in the heart of Texas.
PappyHarpist, unemployed blue collar worker, and Bush basher living deep in the heart of Texas.

never-beens

There are only three requirements to be president of the US.

1) You must be a natural-born American, ie, either born on American soil, or born of American Parents outside of the US.

2) You must be thirty-five years of age.

3) Fourteen years of residency.

There is nothing about being able to answer a red phone. There is nothing about being able to blow huge volumes of smoke up the collective ass of America. There is nothing about the bullshit issue that keep surfacing again and again: experience.

DUBYA has experience being a president. That doesn't mean he's done a good job, or is even capable of doing one. Bill Clinton has experience, but he can't be president anymore.

John McBrain has no experience as president. He has lots being the sycophant to a president. Hillary has no experience being president. She's seen it happen, but that's a lot different than doing it. Barrack has no experience, and doesn't seem to make any bones about it.

I would be the first one to jump up and change my mind about Hillary if she would just admit she was wrong! But she refuses to admit this, and covers it up with a huge pile of bullshit. I'm not in the mood for another tweaked out bullshit artist in the White House.

I can't wait until the election is over. I am SOOOOO sick of the whole thing, I could vomit...if I didn't hate that feeling so much.

Blessed be!
Pappy

by Pappy (61 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 863 comments) on Thursday, March 6, 2008 at 10:55:34 PM
 


Retired from United Airlines after a 36.5 year career. Had pension stole from me by unscrupulous corporate management. I have already experienced a microcosm of what the country is going to go through! Every thing that is going to go down is about GREED!
K ButlerRetired from United Airlines after a 36.5 year career. Had pension stole from me by unscrupulous corporate management. I have already experienced a microcosm of what the country is going to go through! Every thing that is going to go down is about GREED!

Just Wondering ...

Has any thought been given to the possibility of Hillary costing Democrats the election.  How many democrats just refuse to vote for her?  I have always been a lifelong Democrat, and I fit in the above mentioned category.  If she gets the nomination as Democratic candidate for President, then I intend to write in Ron Paul.

I possibly would vote for Obama, but still my candidate of choice would be Ron Paul.  I don't agree with every thing he proposes, but I do believe he is the only honest, sincere candidate out there. 

by K Butler (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 8 comments) on Friday, March 7, 2008 at 12:14:42 AM
 


Professor Bagnolo is a Renaissance man: Cultural Anthropologist, Architectural designer, painter, writer, novelist, theologian. As a child prodigy, abed with polio for almost two years, with an off the charts IQ, reading at the graduate level by 5th grade, offered an opportunity to skip three grades at age 8.Later He was a recipient of an Art Institute scholarship at age 11, a Ford Foundation Fellowship in Anthropology and in Painting and a merit scholarship in art, and was appointed a Graduate ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Professor Emeritus Peter BagnoloProfessor Bagnolo is a Renaissance man: Cultural Anthropologist, Architectural designer, painter, writer, novelist, theologian. As a child prodigy, abed with polio for almost two years, with an off the charts IQ, reading at the graduate level by 5th grade, offered an opportunity to skip three grades at age 8.Later He was a recipient of an Art Institute scholarship at age 11, a Ford Foundation Fellowship in Anthropology and in Painting and a merit scholarship in art, and was appointed a Graduate ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

I had a red phone, once...

I had a red phone, once, my daughter called it THE BAT PHONE. only five people had the number: The mayor, The Majority Leader, my daughter's principal, my wife and my mom. It was in the thrid floor studio of our home.

Both candidates are rookies, neither of which would have been my 1st choice, but I think that Obama can beat McCain, and I believe McCain can beat Hillary.

I think they are afraid to attack a man of color the way they would Hillary and Michele has not the baggage of Bill. So, there you have it from my point of view.

by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo (144 articles, 1 quicklinks, 94 diaries, 1185 comments) on Friday, March 7, 2008 at 7:03:28 AM
 


I am concerned about the intentions of our elected leaders.
Stephen HartI am concerned about the intentions of our elected leaders.

My apologies to Kristen Breitweiser

I just left this same response on her article, but it applies here as well.

I desperately hope that each candidate for President of the United States will be asked this one question:

If your chief of staff tells you, "America is under attack," what will you do first.

For six years, we have not known what our President would do the next time those words were uttered. We know what he did once, and we know that what he did then showed monstrous negligence.

The President who began lobbying immediately after taking office for billions to fund a new "Star Wars" initiative, obviously never asked himself this simple question. Yet those billions he requested were for a system to shoot down missiles attacking an American city, a scenario that dramatically played out on 9/11, a day that changed all our lives, and Kristen's life (and that of her daughter) most tragically. President George W. Bush was not prepared.

For fifty years, the standard had been that the military would respond under the command and control of the President. To my knowledge that is still the standard. But I do not know what President Bush would do the next time.

Do you?

I believe that at some point President Bush should have been compelled to testify that he had thought about it and decided that next time he would get up and make himself available to those who would need his authorization to do the things that only a President can legally authorize, such as shooting down civilian aircraft or launching a nuclear counter-attack. But somehow he was given a two-term pass on this.

After leaving ourselves totally uncovered for the remainder of President Bush's term, I believe it is a good time to return to common sense. If anyone in the press is reading this, perhaps they could ask the question of a candidate.

It really doesn't have to be a "gotcha. " As far as I am concerned, it can be an open book question for anyone who is not currently President. If anyone has the temerity to ask President Bush this question, he should have a good answer.

by Stephen Hart (1 articles, 1 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 23 comments) on Sunday, March 9, 2008 at 8:35:27 PM
 

 

5 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

 

 

 

 

Articles
Diaries Members
Products Events
Polls  
  

Articles Popularity:

Momentum Building For Bugliosi's Case Against George W. Bush For Murder
by Linda Milazzo

A Declaration of Independence from the Government of the United States
by Anonymous

Bush Fulfills His Grandfather's Dream
by David Swanson

Fortis Prediction of US Bank Meltdown a Net Hoax: The Making of an Urban Legend
by Paul Haughey

POW/MIA Families Alleged McCain Assault: Senate Ethics Committee Failed to Investigate
by elliot cohen

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN GAS REACHES 7 DOLLARS A GALLON ?
by Allen L Roland

Why were 'first responders' de-contaminated at the Pentagon?
by Len Hart

Ex Weapons Inspector: Iran Not Pursuing Nukes, But U.S. Will Attack Before '09
by Jason Leopold

Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official Account of 9/11
by Alan Miller

Free Energy and the Open Source Energy Movement
by jibbguy