Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
December 25, 2006 at 10:31:32

View Ratings | Rate It

Pelosi and Conyers-- Smarter than Impeachment-

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Rob Kall (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Rob Kall - Writer

A lot of people are angry with Nancy Pelosi and John Conyers because they say impeachment is not on the table. I say "thank goodness."

You see, I'm in a hurry. I want to see the big cleanup in Washington happen much faster-- including showing Cheney and Bush the door, and maybe, the prison yard. Pelosi and Conyers are doing things exactly right and they have a better chance of my goal-- removal of Bush and Cheney from office-- than if they were going the impeachment route.

Pelosi has already stated that it is her constitutional responsibility to investigate. I am certain that within days of the opening of the new congress, Conyers, Waxman and others will begin holding hearings. They will begin investigating some of the most obvious problems and questions and they will happily go where those investigations lead them.


They will be using prosecutors on their investigative teams. One of the most effective ways prosecutors work is to interrogate and "nail" smaller, lower level perpetrators who then "roll over" to inform on higher ups. This is what will be happening all over Washington.

The sweet thing about congressional hearings is that there are no lawyer-client confidentiality priveleges. Yep. The lawyers have to squeal like stuck pigs or face contempt of congress charges-- which they are not very likely to do.

The rolling over will quickly reach the upper echelons of power. The evidence and testimony will build.

First, Cheney will be in the targets. Like Spiro Agnew, Nixon's vice president, Cheney will resign rather than face serious prison charges.

At that point, Bush will submit his appointment of a vice president replacement for both houses of congress to approve. The Democratic majority in congress must delay approving anyone as vice president until Bush is dealt with. It is interesting to speculate who Bush might appoint-- Joe Lieberman? Olympia Snowe? Or will he act consist with his past obliviousness to reality and appoint Gonzalez or Rice?

Immediately after Cheney resigns. Bush becomes the target. By then, plenty of evidence and testimony will have been accumulated, but the Dems will have been saving the worst, behind closed doors. At this point, some of it will be leaked. It will hurt at least one Republican member of congress. It will make the Republicans look even worse.

At this point, the Republicans, about fifteen or sixteen of those in the senate, particularly ones up for re-election in 2008, will take a walk-- not a phone call, not e-mail-- a walk, to the oval office. They will inform the president that he must resign to save the Republican party from implosive destruction. They will tell him that to save the Republican party they are willing to join with the Democrats to impeach him out of office. They will instruct him to do the right thing for the country and save it the trauma, mostly at the expense of the Republicans, of a horrible impeachment, which is inevitable, since the most revelations about testimony and evidence on Bush has brought his ratings down to less than 20% approval rating.

Bush will, in his attempt to negotiate, ask for either no criminal sentence or a minimal one. The Dems should not let him off scott free. Bush should do time in jail and he should be fined Billions. That's right. Billions. Not only that, he should be banned from profitting from his presidency and includes making any speeches or consulting as a lobbyist. Send him to his ranch to clear brush.

This is not a wild, crazy scenario. It is very realistic, very possible and could play itself out by November. Then we get to play with some fun questions.

Who will become vice president?

Will President Nancy Pelosi run for re-election?

Which Bush appointees will be the best at rolling over on their boss, providing the most devastating testimony?

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Book Recommendations for "Bush Admin"
Bush admin. farm bill plan: so is it really the reform they talked about?: An article from: Pro Farmer
by Gale Reference Team

$9.95

Number of pages: 4
Publisher: Thomson Gale

Bush admin. delays E-Verify, women's Set-Aside.: An article from: Set-Aside Alert
by Gale Reference Team

$9.95

Number of pages: 2
Publisher: Business Research Services, Inc.

Transforming Mental Health Care in America (Federal Action Agenda: 1st Steps)

$4.89

Number of pages: 83
Publisher: Mental Health Services Admin., DHHS

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
74 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

So Rob, who else would you expect? by ardee D. on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 11:13:20 AM
I knew. by Rob Kall on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 11:54:07 AM
Not sure by Fred F on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 12:09:25 PM
The President appoints one by ardee D. on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 7:11:41 AM
who replaces VP? by none on Tuesday, Jan 2, 2007 at 3:45:34 AM
LUST by Fred F on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 2:33:47 PM
LOL by RCG on Wednesday, Dec 27, 2006 at 8:38:18 AM
Good catch by Putnik on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 10:44:04 PM
Honest and Open Government... by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 9:20:31 AM
About time by Fred F on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 12:03:28 PM
Impeachment by Mark A. Goldman on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 12:17:56 PM
I agree by Fred F on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 12:27:53 PM
Investigations need to come first by Sleeper on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 1:03:45 PM
But Sleeper by ardee D. on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 7:13:43 AM
Shredding Parties by Sleeper on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 1:14:42 PM
How can you be so optimistic? And in such detail? by Yaybob on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 8:51:04 PM
Impeachment by Mark A. Goldman on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 12:35:06 PM
Impeachment is foolish by Robert Chapman on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:46:18 PM
Happy Holidays, Bob by ardee D. on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 3:13:30 PM
It's not just a good idea - it's the law. by Yaybob on Wednesday, Dec 27, 2006 at 7:26:11 AM
Presidential Succession Act by Frank J. Ranelli on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 12:58:04 PM
That's what I thought by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 11:23:25 AM
Obstructing Justices in a War Crime by Fred F on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 1:04:30 PM
Obstructing Justices in a War Crime" by Robert Chapman on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:54:00 PM
WISHFUL THINKING by francine on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 2:08:29 PM
whip into form by Fred F on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 2:18:46 PM
"whip into form" by Robert Chapman on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:59:34 PM
Ego trip by Fred F on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 1:55:52 PM
The internet. by Theo on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 7:27:44 PM
Offenses already evident by Kuzminski on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 2:19:04 PM
We just don't know what will happen until it does by Sleeper on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 2:42:32 PM
reply by Fred F on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 3:03:11 PM
Offenses already evident" by Robert Chapman on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 1:04:23 PM
Forgotten Iran-Contra already, Rob? by Mark E. Smith on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 3:58:39 PM
I haven't forgotten anything by Sleeper on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 5:26:24 PM
"Forgotten Iran-Contra already, Rob?" by Robert Chapman on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 1:11:39 PM
Scorch with public spotlight and a webinfo magnifying lens by meremark on Monday, Dec 25, 2006 at 11:49:03 PM
The analysis is good, but by Mark E. Smith on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 7:59:36 AM
Could it be by Robert Chapman on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 1:21:37 PM
Where the Carrot meets the Stick. by Dom Jermano on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 4:31:09 AM
Remove Bush and Cheney to Stop their Police State. by Dan Merica on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 7:27:15 AM
Interment Camps... by larry booth on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:44:37 PM
"Interment Camps..." by Robert Chapman on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 1:25:14 PM
I would bet by ardee D. on Saturday, Dec 30, 2006 at 9:54:52 AM
Strategical Move by Viki on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 8:59:40 AM
Come on... by aman on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 9:40:55 AM
WMD.... by larry booth on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:50:17 PM
"Come on..." by Robert Chapman on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 1:34:47 PM
SO LYING ABOUT INVADING A COUNTRY IS NOT A CRIME by SwampWitch on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 6:07:52 PM
The Media by Theo on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 7:54:19 PM
You're awesome by Yaybob on Sunday, Dec 31, 2006 at 6:07:11 AM
acrossamill and those damn liberals by boing007 on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 10:24:21 AM
Sounds good to me by on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 2:39:42 PM
THE THREAT OF IMPEACHMENT by Kenneth Briggs on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 3:43:43 PM
I call it Treason by cluelessfl on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 6:45:19 PM
So..... Nixon had more integrity by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 9:27:01 PM
Nixon integrity by Fred F on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 9:42:16 PM
Impeachment requires merely... by JimZ on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 8:57:17 PM
Cheney has to go first by markg8 on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 11:01:21 PM
Cheney has already declared by ardee D. on Thursday, Jan 4, 2007 at 6:25:03 PM
HOMONYM USAGE by L. RETZACK on Tuesday, Dec 26, 2006 at 11:47:58 PM
"My guess is there's a lot of heavy hitters.." by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Dec 27, 2006 at 11:52:59 AM
Back to reality by johndoraemi on Wednesday, Dec 27, 2006 at 12:19:10 AM
Glad you agree, Rob! (tongue-in-cheek) by ZENmud on Wednesday, Dec 27, 2006 at 8:54:28 AM
Ford had two qualifications... by markg8 on Wednesday, Dec 27, 2006 at 9:13:01 AM
Impeachment pro or con by richmiles on Wednesday, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:49:48 AM
How Can I Disagree when you write... by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Dec 27, 2006 at 11:57:14 AM
And sweat justice it will be by Fred F on Wednesday, Dec 27, 2006 at 3:54:33 PM
Relax Folks by Krashkopf on Wednesday, Dec 27, 2006 at 6:07:29 PM
Do NOT forget these people are experts at destroying lives!! by Lonna Gooden VanHorn on Wednesday, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:11:57 PM
Investigate First by Greg33 on Thursday, Dec 28, 2006 at 2:40:23 AM
I hope you are right , Rob by Sleeper on Thursday, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:59:43 PM
GROWING IMPEACH MOVEMENT ACROSS USA by HUTCH on Friday, Dec 29, 2006 at 1:56:46 PM
A Different Opinion of the President by Dom Jermano on Friday, Jan 5, 2007 at 4:50:12 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum