Tags for This Article:

USA United States Of America (7149)  Democracy (1689)  Republicans-GOP (1232)  World (998)  Consciousness - Enlightenment (174)  Self Help- Personal Growth (51)  Euthanasia (14) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
April 13, 2007 at 13:44:18

For Democracy's Sake, Vote for Euthanasia

by Peter Michaelson     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

Church and state are feuding in California over euthanasia, an issue whose underlying principle—the evolvement of our personal authority—extends beyond the deathbed to the health of our democracy.

Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez, an L.A. Democrat in the California legislature, is “bucking his church,” as he puts it, to press for legislation similar to Oregon’s to allow terminally ill people to speed up their deaths with lethal drugs. Bucking back is Cardinal Roger M. Mahoney, archbishop of Los Angeles, who says Nunez is following “the culture of death.”

The Catholic Church says no—we don’t have the inner authority to end our own life when terminal illness makes misery of our remaining time. Why should religion treat us like children when democracy treats us like adults? Democracy holds us to a high standard. Belief in democracy is a belief in the triumph of our best nature. If we fail to behave as responsible adults, democracy fails. If democracy expects the best of us, why do so many religious and state authorities believe we can’t be trusted on a matter such as euthanasia?

Citizens of a democracy need to have a level of inner authority in order to hold their leaders accountable and demand a high standard of service and governance. To fulfill our citizenship responsibilities, we have to believe that our vote counts and our voice matters. Through democracy, we have granted to ourselves a great honor—a belief in our value and our sovereignty.

These troubled times now appeal to us to deepen that belief in ourselves. Our evolvement is necessary and needs to be supported. Evolvement is required to end violence and war and to save the planet. In both the moral and civic arena, we can regularly practice or exercise our personal authority and find new ways to develop it further.

Aware citizens accept responsibility for the destiny of America. Doesn’t that mean we’re able also to accept responsibility for ourselves, in the form of life-or-death decisions concerning our own health, welfare, and freedom? We can’t simultaneously be heroes to the nation, or even adequate citizens, while being cowards to our own conscience.

How can we oppose power-hungry politicians if we don’t have inner power? Inner authority gives any person who possesses it the ability to effectively oppose authoritarian personalities such as those found in conservative America. For example, John Dean, once Richard Nixon’s legal counsel, writes that authoritarian personalities have in the past 20 years taken over the Republican Party. Dean’s 2006 best-seller, Conservatives Without Conscience, is almost exclusively about the authoritarian personality disorder and its prevalence among conservative politicians who rose to power through the support of the religious right.

Authoritarian personalities are common enough, and they will always be in our midst trying to worm their way into power. Their end-runs around the law steamroll over tradition, civility, and fairness. They have corrupted capitalism and political life, and they won’t necessarily stop to save the planet or care for a dying person in pain. Only we can stop them. It will be easier to do so when our deepening sense of self gives us access to more of our integrity, compassion, and personal power.

Even among secular citizens, our considerable passivity and self-doubt make it easy for us to be directed and controlled. We have a hard time assuming inner authority. Many of us are afraid of it. For starters, we all have an inner critic which poses as our conscience. The inner critic, also known as the superego, continuously undermines our authority and holds us accountable for all sorts of alleged misdeeds. This produces inner guilt, which leaves us feeling that we can’t trust ourselves to make important decisions and that we have to be told what to do.

If we recognize the inner critic as irrational and negative, we can neutralize its influence. In this way, we empower ourselves. Now we more easily know right from wrong, good from bad, wisdom from folly, and progress from self-defeat. Inner authority is a stickler for the truth.

It is wrong, for instance, for Cardinal Mahoney to say that euthanasia represents “a culture of death.” How can the cardinal say that, while ignoring the war in Iraq and its culture of death? The cardinal is being authoritarian, and with that comes irrationality. Irrational authority is illegitimate. We mustn’t let such irrationality go unchallenged. Through our sincerity and good intentions, we must feel the legitimacy of our own authority.

 

www.QuestForSelf.com

Peter Michaelson is a psychotherapist and author in Plymouth, MI. He offers telephone sessions and specializes in marriage and partnership conflict resolution. PDF files of his books are available at www.QuestForSelf.com.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

Robert Chapman is greatly interested in developing political awareness among as many people as possible.
Robert ChapmanRobert Chapman is greatly interested in developing political awareness among as many people as possible.

No

Peter Michaelson makes a powerful statement for euthanasia in conflating it with individual liberty and the burdens of bureaucracy.

But he has failed to adress the moral dilemna of assisting another person's death.

For a euthanasia decision to be moral in Michaelson's view, it would require the informed and unconstrained consent of both parties.

The pertinent parties to such a decision are the physician and the patient. 

Michaelson's analysis neglects their roles.

Under what conditions would a person opt for death?  To spare others' suffering or sacrifice or to end unspeakable agony.

There is no way that it is moral for society to tolerate the impoverishment of heir, usually a spouse and children caring for a terminal patient.  It is unreasonable to state that a person willing to die to prevent such a sacrifice is making an unconstrained decision.

The matter of euthanasia to relieve unspeakable agony stemming from a terminal and untreatable disease is much more compelling, but it is hard to view as an unconstrained decision.

Despite the moral ambiguity of euthanasia stemming from such a patient request, the alternative of imposing sanctions on a physician for cooperating with the death request of a patient in these straits is reprehensible.

What are the obligations and responsibilities that a physician faced with the request for release from agony faces?

I am not competent to answer this, but it must be publicly debated and profoundly considered.

Legislative action seems necessary, if only to protect  a physician trapped in the connundrum of easing unspeakable agony or ending a life.

A permissive action must assure that no euthanasia can be performed without the competent, unconstained and recent affirmation of the patient. 

Living wills may include DNRs, but should not be construed to permit euthansia.

Conversely, a law forbidding euthanasia spares the physician the decision.

It is hard to see the efficacy of public action at this stage of the debate.

Clearly, we should follow the debate closely and use all means to communicate with legislators and to inform them of our interest and intent.

It is probably also useful to let the legislators know that kow-towing to the Churches or to other such actors will not be tolerated.

But to begin pressuring legislators at this stage constains too much the topics and field for debate.

For myself, this question is easy: God does not grant all divine gifts at once.  I will die as I live, trusting in beneficent Providence.

Robert Chapman

Lansing, NY

by Robert Chapman (28 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 557 comments) on Saturday, April 14, 2007 at 11:38:20 AM
 


I'm a 61year old white guy, Veteran of 66-68, operate my own business with my wife and love to travel. Built a big sailboat in the 70's and went sailing for a few years, which ruined me for real work. Now, I fly hot air balloons for a living. Have been initiated as an Andean Paq'o. Yes, I am a liberal.
RogerI'm a 61year old white guy, Veteran of 66-68, operate my own business with my wife and love to travel. Built a big sailboat in the 70's and went sailing for a few years, which ruined me for real work. Now, I fly hot air balloons for a living. Have been initiated as an Andean Paq'o. Yes, I am a liberal.

Choice

If one has the courage and opportunity it does not matter if the course of action chosen is legal or not.    A bottle of Helium and a plastic bag will do the job.  The real problem is when a person does not have the ablilty to act on the choice and one's friends or family woud be at risk of prison for helping with a person's stated desire to avoid a long, perhaps painful decline.  For me, if I ever have the misfortune to get a diagnosis that would mean my wife would be left destitute by the time I am graced with death, I hope I do exhibit the necessary courage before it is too late for me to act.

 

by Roger (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 325 comments) on Sunday, April 15, 2007 at 4:27:23 PM
 

 

2 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
(Most forwarded)

Are you ready for nuclear war? by Paul Craig Roberts

Loserville: Obama Is Channeling Kerry and Gore by Dave Lindorff

Fresh New Discovery - Can You Guess What This Photo Is? by Meryl Ann Butler

"Caroline: Pull a Cheney!" An Open Letter to Caroline Kennedy (head of the Obama VP search team) by Michael Moore

NSA MAY BE READING WINDOWS SOFTWARE IN YOUR COMPUTER by Sherwood Ross

Pelosi Gets "Booked" & Confronts Her Own Past by Linda Milazzo

Mr. Bill: "OH NO, Fix the coast you broke, Shell Oil!" by Georgianne Nienaber

The REAL John McCain by Mike Kuykendall

The Urgency of Impeachment by Jeeni Criscenzo

New Zogby/Reuters Poll: Obama Down 5, in an Almost Perfect Storm by Rob Kall

24 hrs 48 hrs
72 hrs 1 week
1 month 6 months
1 year All Time
Articles
Diaries Members
Products Events
Polls