Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
March 13, 2008 at 12:23:53

View Ratings | Rate It

Believe it or not, this is the NH method of "securing" the vote

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Nancy Tobi (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Nancy Tobi - Writer

Original posting here: ttp://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5561

Believe it or not, this is the NH method of "securing" the vote. The question is: for whom?

The chase continues...See the BlackBoxVoting video below



NH Diebold-lovers and voting machine apologists like to point to our paper ballot hand count recounts in order to rationalize outsourcing the counting of 80-90% of our votes to private corporate interests using secret vote-counting technologies.

They say we need these secret vote-counting privatized machines on election night to spare our election officials the "burden" of staying late to count the ballots.

They say, what's the problem? We can always count the paper ballots by hand in a recount.

Hmmmm...Look at what happens to the paper ballots between Election Night Diebold count and the hand count recount. Watch the videos. Do you feel the recount is secure?

Here is the truth: Publicly observable, hand counts on ELECTION NIGHT are the only secure way to ensure the integrity of election results. There is no Butch and Hoppy show that way. There are no high-speed chases led by Butch and Hoppy with our paper ballots in their van as they try to elude citizen oversight.

Get it right on Election Night. Counting the votes is the "burden" of democracy. If our election officials and state legislators can't handle this "burden" then they ought to step down. NH Legislators, under the advise and guidance of NH Deputy Secretary of State David Scanlan, this year alone killed five important bills that would have protected our elections against Diebold-controlled secret vote-counting. See below the list of bills the Election Law Committee killed, at the recommendation of the Chair of that committee.

If NH legislators and election officials at the state and local levels think we can't handle the "burden" of counting our votes, maybe it's time for them to go and make room for others who believe we need to and will do whatever it takes to protect our democracy.

Click to view video below, and scroll down to see full list of election law bills killed in Committee and by the full House in 2007.

http://www.viddler.com/blackboxvoting/videos/1/

Here are the bills the NH Election Law Committee Chair arranged to have killed:

HB136: would have required the Ballot Law Commission (BLC) to apply a standard for approval of voting technology: "Before approving any voting machine or device, the ballot law commission shall, following a public hearing, find that there is clear and convincing evidence that the voting machine or device being examined has been designed and manufactured with adequate safeguards to insure the integrity of election results."

HB138: would have required full public disclosure of voting technology information (Deputy Secretary of State Scanlan, representing industry interests rather than voter interests, argued "we can't require disclosure because the vendor won't go for it" and "we can't make drastic changes like this too quickly".

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.democracyfornewhampshire.com

Nancy Tobi is co-founder, former Chair, and website editor for Democracy for New Hampshire (DFNH). She is also a founder and Chair of the NH Fair Elections Committee. Nancy is the author of numerous articles on election integrity, including "The (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Corporations E Voting"
Voting policies of institutional investors on corporate governance issues (Corporate governance service)
by James E Heard


Number of pages: 42
Publisher: Investor Responsibility Research Center

An assessment of the SEC shareholder proposal rule
by Donald E Schwartz


Number of pages:
Publisher: Georgetown Law Journal

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

DOA by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:38:55 PM
Solution DOA by Techknowledgie on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:34:20 PM
Thanks for the comments but... by Nancy Tobi on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:52:01 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum