Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Why the EAC Must Be Abolished

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)

opednews.com

Why the EAC Must Be Abolished

By Nancy Tobi, ntobi@democracyfornewhampshire.com

The democratic processes of the American Republic are based on decentralized power. Centralized power led to the American Revolution. Centralized power is the antithesis of a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

1. Centralization of Executive Power-White House Control over Counting the Votes: Current legislative proposals , such as the Holt Bill (1) or Clinton's election reform bill (2), include extending beyond the existing expiry date the power and authority of the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), establishing a Presidential Commission authorized to control the counting of votes in every election--federal, state, and local--in the nation.

2. Centralization of Executive Power-Crony Appointments: The potential for stacking of the EAC is evident in the scenario already played out under the current Administration. In early 2006, the Bush White House made numerous recess appointments (3), putting political appointees into positions of power and authority without any Congressional oversight or checks and balances. Of the eight recess appointments made on January 4, 2006, three were Commissioners to the Federal Election Commission. Two of those appointed Commissioners are known for their opposition to voting rights and clean elections. The third is a political crony of Senate Minority Leader Reid of Nevada. Bush's two latest appointees to the EAC, neither of whom has any election experience to speak of, were nonetheless confirmed by Congress without public hearing, follow the same pattern of crony appointments.(4)

3. Centralization of Executive Power-Regulatory Authority: Federal regulatory authority means the federal entity preempts state and local authorities. In the matter of elections, this becomes a Constitutional issue because the US Constitution wisely endowed the States with authority over election administration. This enforces decentralization of power, which is a foundational building block for American democratic processes. HAVA (5) created the EAC as an advisory commission with one exception: it was granted regulatory authority over the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). The EAC has been steadily positioning and even suing (6) to assert its regulatory authority in other areas under its domain.

Even if it does not succeed through litigation, the EAC could, with the insertion of a single line of text in ANY congressional act, become regulatory. This is how the FEC gained regulatory powers. A regulatory EAC means that a Presidential Commission-potentially stacked with political cronies-would have legal decision making and enforcement power over the following areas, for every state in the nation:

  • Which voting systems are approved for use in our elections
  • Who counts the votes in every election
  • How votes are counted in every election
  • How recounts are administered and how their outcomes are determined

An editorial in the New York Times, entitled "Strong Arming the Vote" (August 3, 2006) (7) describes how the Department of Justice under the Bush Administration has been heavily involved in partisan ploys to negate necessary checks and balances in election practices.

Any legislation that makes permanent the EAC will establish a whole new arm of Executive power with dangerous authority to subvert the entire democratic process of elections that supports our system of government. It would result, in effect, in a bloodless coup.

(1) http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.00811:

(2) http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.01381: and http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:s.00804:

(3) http://www.sourcewatch.org/

(4) http://www.eac.gov/news_030807.asp

(5) http://www.fec.gov/hava/law_ext.txt

(6) http://www.eac.gov/

(7) http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/03/opinion/edit-1-thu.html

 

https://www.youtube.com/handsonelections

Nancy Tobi is best known as a national leader in the voting rights movement for her seminal work exposing the dangers and fallacies in various election reform efforts past, present and future. Nancy is co-founder and former Chair of Democracy for (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

NH recounts no check and balance for its privatized corporate-controlled elections

Summary of the Stimulus bill - Don't look half bad to me

NH Secretary of State: "Citizen Election Observers Threaten Election Integrity"

The Myth of Verified Voting: How GOP strategists & J. Abramoff transformed America's elections & the reform movement

2009 Holt Bill. E-Voting: Making a bad system worse

The Gasser

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments