Tags for This Article:

Progressive Values - Issues (657)  Left Wing (101)  Public Life (64) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ;
Add to My Group
April 16, 2007 at 19:41:38

My movement is bigger than yours

by Mickey Z.     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

A couple of my recent articles have directly challenged the concept of unconditional support for our (sic) troops. It should come as no surprise that this sentiment is typically greeted with unrestrained hostility. The most predictable knee-jerk reaction involves the accusation that I might hurt the "movement" by alienating soldiers and their families. Some go even further and declare that returning soldiers are doing more for the "movement" than anyone else (especially obscure writers like your truly). These critiques are flawed for many reasons, e.g.:

1. They are not only assuming the existence of a perplexed mass of fence sitters just waiting for the right moment to pick a side, they also believe these fence sitters actually care (or even read) what someone like me writes

2. They ignore the "alienation" being created when Americans voluntarily sign up for military

3. Just because someone says returning soldiers are doing more for the "movement" than anyone else doesn't mean it's true

Still, the most fundamental flaw in play here is the use of the word "movement." This isn't semantics, mind you. Rather, it gets to the heart of the issue. The state of global affairs has long passed the proverbial tipping point (and is more likely flirting with the dreaded point of no return). Allowing ourselves the luxury of believing there's a genuine movement in place to challenge the dominant suicidal/homicidal culture-when no such movement exists-is disastrously counterproductive. 

Most folks, it seems, have confused the occasional weekend parade, I mean, protest with a full-blown movement. Anti-Bush bumper stickers, yearly checks to Greenpeace, and a commitment to recycled toilet paper don't constitute a movement either. Candlelight vigils? Nope. Vegan diets? I wish. Petitions, voting drives, letters to Congress? Surely you jest. Posting lots of comments at Daily Kos? Yeah, right. Yellow ribbons, red ribbons, pink ribbons? Doubt it. Becoming the change you wish to see in the world? Nice try. Reality check #1: There's a huge difference between a minority of sincere Americans making well-intentioned gestures and a tangible, functional, effective movement capable of inciting/inspiring/demanding social change.

Arundhati Roy sez: "People from poorer places and poorer countries have to call upon their compassion not to be angry with ordinary people in America." Ward Churchill takes it further...warning us that those same folks "from poorer places and poorer countries" have "no obligation-moral, ethical, legal or otherwise-to sit on their thumbs while the opposition (in America) dithers about doing anything to change the system." Reality check #2: Americans wield more influence and power than any people on the planet but, while the vast majority of humans in this world live in abject poverty, we live our lives in such a manner as to threaten every living being on the planet. 

Reality check #3: There are no innocent bystanders.

Mickey Z.: http://www.mickeyz.net. 

 

http://www.mickeyz.net

Mickey Z.  can be found on the Web at http://www.mickeyz.net. 

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments

10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,
Gallaher10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,

Solider Speak negatively about war?

I have rarely seen a solider speak negatively about the alleged “war” on terror.

It would be like a DEA agent speaking negatively against the “war” on drugs. This only happen with so called disgruntled former employees that no one will listen to because they have other issues.

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 608 comments) on Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 9:43:56 PM
 

 

1 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

The Mailer That Put the Final Nail in the McCain Campaign Coffin by Rob Kall

Obama Must Appoint a Consumer Protectionist as FDA Commissioner by Stephen Fox

On Naomi Wolf's Sounding the Alarm by Dr. Dennis Loo

Race in the 2008 Election by Sally Liuzzo-Prado

FEMA Official States Bush Is Planning To Implement Martial Law by William Cormier

Capitalism Condemned in Scriptures; Let's Dump It by Jay Janson

Resignation letter from the McCain Palin Campaign by Robyn Crane

Aries Full Moon October 14, 2008 by C.L. Pagano

Cindy McCain Blames Vets for PTSD by Stuart Steinberg

What you should know about Barack Obama by miles mathis

Go To Top 50 Most Popular