Tags for This Article:

Bush GW (2224)  Democracy (1805)  Bush Failed Policy International (1607)  Bush Enemy Of Democracy (1076)  Bush Enemy Of Human Rights (823)  Bush Failed Policy Domestic (571)  Pakistan (563)  Pakistan (352)  Musharraf (288) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
November 25, 2007 at 12:16:58

Headlined on 11/25/07:
Bush, Musharraf, and the Meaning of Democracy

by Mary Shaw     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

It's been a rough month in Pakistan. On November 3, General Pervez Musharraf suspended the constitution and declared a state of emergency, and then all hell broke loose.

Musharraf's thugs arrested and imprisoned hundreds of lawyers, human rights activists, and political opponents. They closed down all local and foreign news channels except the state-controlled Pakistan Television, and warned the media not to print or broadcast "anything which defames or brings into ridicule the head of state, or members of the armed forces, or executive, legislative, or judicial organ of the state." According to Amnesty International, even though some of the political prisoners have since been released, as many as 200 or more may still remain in detention, and more arrests have been taking place.



And what does George W. Bush think of all this? Well, in an ABC News interview with Charles Gibson on November 20, Bush said that Musharraf "hasn't crossed the line." He defended Musharraf as "a loyal ally in fighting terrorists" and claimed that Musharraf has "advanced democracy in Pakistan."

Hmmmmmmm...

Seems like a funny way to advance democracy. And I wonder just how far Musharraf would have to go to cross the line.

On second thought, Bush's comments seem to fit with his own idea of advancing democracy.

Bush keeps telling us that he's spreading freedom and democracy in Iraq. And how has he been doing that? By launching an unprovoked attack on that country in defiance of the U.N. Charter, bombing the hell out of it, killing tens of thousands of innocent civilian men, women, and children over the past four and a half years, and not bothering to rebuild the country's infrastructure or restore essential services like electricity, clean water, and security.

That's our Bush -- spreading democracy at the point of a gun.

Now he wants to spread democracy to Iran, only this time with nukes. Free the Iranian people by nuking them. What a way to win hearts and minds.

And look at what he's been doing to advance democracy here at home.

He spies on us without court warrants.

He pressures Congress into passing laws abolishing habeas corpus rights.

He arbitrarily labels people as enemy combatants, tosses them into Gitmo, and denies them any kind of due process so they have no way to challenge their detention or prove their innocence.

He allows his henchmen to torture people.

And he refuses to compromise with the new Democratic-led Congress. It's always his way or the highway.

And so our brave troops continue to fight and die for Bush's agenda: Full control of the U.S. government and full control of Middle Eastern oil resources for Bush and his corporate bedpartners.

 1  |  2

 

http://www.maryshawonline.com

Mary Shaw is a Philadelphia-based writer and activist, with a focus on politics, human rights, and social justice. She is a former Philadelphia Area Coordinator for the Nobel-Prize-winning human rights group Amnesty International, and her views appear regularly in a variety of newspapers, magazines, and websites. Note that the ideas expressed here are the author's own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Amnesty International or any other organization with which she may be associated.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments

Politically, I lean Libertarian. When discussing issues, I will slam Dems and/or Republicans.

Now, when it comes to really irritating me, just make an unfounded charge; I will call out whomever makes the charge if there are no facts to back it up! Another version of this is when I see something that is just plainly silly/ridiculous.

An example could be something stated which could be very easily disproved. Another example, and I see this frequently: Rather tha...

to see more of bio, click on member name

steve scheetzPolitically, I lean Libertarian. When discussing issues, I will slam Dems and/or Republicans.

Now, when it comes to really irritating me, just make an unfounded charge; I will call out whomever makes the charge if there are no facts to back it up! Another version of this is when I see something that is just plainly silly/ridiculous.

An example could be something stated which could be very easily disproved. Another example, and I see this frequently: Rather tha...

to see more of bio, click on member name

you had me. then you went off on your "second thougt"

So I will ignore the on second thought set of comments, because they have been discussed into the ground.

You raise a VERY valid point when you asked the question:  How far must Musharraf go to cross the line?

He HAS crossed the line..  Just like Saddam crossed the line... Just like the Shah of Iran crossed the line..  (noticing a pattern here??)  STALIN??  how many examples must we cite?

Yes, he is a THUG..  but he is OUR thug!  

this has been the US foreign policy mentality for the past century, probably even before that! 

History has demonstrated that it is a huge mistake to approach things in this manner, yet here we are....

Maybe we could try to persuade the Shrub to stop his support of musharraf...  Of course this could lead to terrorists winding up in control of Pakistan, like when we deposed the Shah, and the Mujahedin took over...

 If we depose Musharraf, we invite the Mujahideen (note the different spelling for the different group)  to take control of the Pakistan and Pakistan's nukes.

Maybe we could approach it a bit more delicately than we have in the past, but be VERY careful what you wish for regarding Pakistan..

 

Ciao, CZ 

by steve scheetz (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 579 comments) on Monday, November 26, 2007 at 10:19:19 AM
 

 

1 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Representatives Were Threatened with "Martial Law" if Bailout Bill Did Not Pass by Patrick Henningsen

Tell Karl, John, Dick, and Sarah in a Letter to the Editor that this Ayers Tactic Just Won't Work! by Stephen Fox

Albright, Clarke, 200 Diplomats Laud Obama's Willingness to Talk Directly to Adversaries Without Preconditions Posted by Stephen Fox

30 Lies Refuted about Ayers and Obama Posted by John Wilson

Those Who Call Obama A Muslim Posted by Rob Kall

Palin Debate Performance Deconstructed by Steven Leser

Palin Hates Native Alaskans, Black Folks Too Posted by Hans Bennett

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

All that's missing are the uniforms! Posted by W. Christopher Epler (Bill)

Meet The $700 Billion Bailout Czar by Rob Kall

Go To Top 50 Most Popular