Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

BUYING-OUT DISABLED VETERANS

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (1 fan)
September 17, 2006

Buying-Out Disabled Veterans

Politically-stacked Vets' Commission looks at lump-sum buyouts of veterans' disability payments

by Larry Scott


Fiscal conservatives called David Stockman "The Budget Wiz" and rallied 'round his concept of a smaller government which was enshrined in his phrase, "Starving the Beast." Stockman was the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) during the Reagan administration and is well-remembered for labeling military retirement pay as "scandalous," calling it a dangerous drain on the economy. Stockman then proposed lump-sum buyouts of military retirement pay because he deemed it less expensive to pay once than to pay for life. (He even toyed with the idea of buyouts for Social Security payments.)

Stockman's buyouts never happened but his cost-cutting ideology lives on today in the person of arch-conservative Grover Norquist who urges the current administration to get government "...down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub." President George W. Bush, while spending hundreds of billions on the war in Iraq, is echoing the Stockman/Norquist mantra.


President Bush often speaks of controlling spending on entitlement programs and lumps Medicare, Medicaid and veterans' benefits under the "entitlement umbrella" by consistently using them in the same sentence. This campaign of disinformation is used to sell the concept that all three of these programs are some kind of welfare, are out of control and therefore should fall under a sharp budget knife. This ignores the reality that Medicare is an insurance program and veterans' disability compensation is provided to those who have been wounded or injured while serving the country.

The Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) has labeled White House veterans' budget proposals "a disgrace and a sham." Peter S. Gaytan, director of health care and benefits at the American Legion, testified before Congress that the Bush administration is trying to "balance the...budget on the backs of America's veterans."

Now, the Stockman/Norquist philosophy has trickled-down to the Department of Veterans' Affairs (VA). The Secretary of Veterans' Affairs is Jim Nicholson, a multi-millionaire land developer and former Chairman of the Republican National Committee. Nicholson has consistently asked for less funding than the VA needs to treat eligible veterans, even to the point of faking budget numbers (see #1 below). So, it's not surprising that one of Stockman's little-noticed recommendations has caught the eye of Nicholson and other conservative political appointees who run the VA. Stockman proposed the buyout of VA disability compensation.

Key to the argument for the buyouts is a report from the VA's Office of Inspector General (VAOIG) which recommended that the VA "revise [disability] rating criteria to reflect expected lifetime impairment so that VA could offer lump-sum payments to veterans..."

The VA is the second-largest government agency with a budget of over $80 billion for fiscal year 2007. The largest portion of the VA budget goes to disability compensation for veterans wounded or injured while on military active-duty. Lump-sum buyouts of VA disability compensation could save the government billions of dollars every year.

Last week, the Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission (VDBC) met in Washington, D.C. and, once again, took up the issue of lump-sum buyouts (see #2 below). The VDBC was created by the Bush administration in 2003 and tasked with determining "...whether the death or disability of a veteran should be compensated..." and at what level, if any. The 13-member VDBC is a politically stacked-deck with nine members being appointed by Republican politicians.

And, Secretary Nicholson supported the buyout concept in a response to the VAOIG report, saying that the VA will "review prior VA studies concerning lump-sum payments to veterans with disability ratings...and [support] the [VDBC] as it considers this public policy issue."

The VDBC has tasked the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) with studying the concept of lump-sum buyouts. In the CNA's Literature Review they write of "...substantial potential savings associated with a lump-sum disability settlement both in terms of reduced debt cost and administrative burden."

There is a great deal of support on Capitol Hill for the lump-sum buyouts. Leading the charge is Rep. Steve Buyer (R-IN), Chairman of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, who sees the buyouts as a logical cost-cutting move (see #3 below). When it comes to the work of the VDBC and what cost-cutting moves they should study Buyer has stated, "I think everything should be on the table."

But, there is opposition. Not one veterans' service organization is in favor of the move. The American Legion, arguably the most conservative veterans' organization, has reminded its members that "...Chairman Buyer and other government officials have publicly expressed their desire to use the VDBC as a vehicle to institute radical changes in the VA disability system that would negatively impact and restrict entitlement to benefits for a large number of veterans." This statement from the American Legion can only be labeled "prophetic" as the VDBC ponders lump-sum buyouts of VA disability payments.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.vawatchdog.org/

Larry Scott served four years in the U.S. Army with overseas tours as a Broadcast Journalist in Korea and the Azores and a stateside tour as a Broadcast Journalism Instructor at the Defense Information School (DINFOS). He was awarded DOD's First Place Thomas Jefferson Award for (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Push to cut Benefits for Vets who get VA and Social Security Compensation

TSA Looks to VA and DoD for “Mental Defectives”

Why Doesn't the VA tell Veterans About Their Benefits?

BUYING-OUT DISABLED VETERANS

SECRETIVE VA LAUNCHES NEW PTSD REVIEW

VETERANS' BENEFITS ARE NOT SAFE

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments