Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Bush's Mail Fraud

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -
As if we needed any further indication that the feckless, sociopathic war criminal in our White House is not the least bit interested in protecting us, but wholly consumed with controlling us, now comes word that George W. Bush thinks he has legitimately granted himself the authority to read our private mail at his whim. I challenge anyone on this planet to show me exactly where the words "Unitary Executive Branch" appear in the United States Constitution, and exactly which clause of this document allows the president to ignore laws passed by Congress as he sees fit with a simple signing statement. There is, quite simply, no such clause and therefore no such presidential authority to arbitrarily sidestep the law. Consequently, there is not a single of the hundreds of Bush signing statements that holds any greater value than the paper it is printed on. The Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 specifically states that First Class Mail cannot be opened without a warrant. But with the signing statement he attached to it, Mr. Bush claims the authority to do exactly that, in "exigent circumstances" (in case of emergency). Sounds like a good argument on its face, and Bush's army of far-right, boot-licking media parrots will no doubt make it. But what they won't tell you is that in 1996, postal regulations were changed to permit the single exception of opening of First Class Mail without a warrant in cases where the Postal Inspector believes there is a credible threat, such as a bomb or other hazardous material in the package. They'll no doubt also neglect to tell you that this single exception remains in place with the new law. So White House spokeswoman Emily Lawrimore was actually correct when she said this week "In certain circumstances such as the proverbial 'ticking bomb' the Constitution does not require warrants for reasonable searches." But if the Felon-in-Chief is not claiming any new authority with this new signing statement, as Lawrimore also claims, what is the reason for it? The reason, folks, is that this administration has either already been illegally rifling through our private mail on a massive scale, or plans to, and they think that another of Bush's mountain of completely worthless signing statements will provide them legal cover when they finally have to answer for their treasonous actions in court. It is not nearly enough to simply impeach these criminals and remove them from office. If we are to maintain any shred of credibility in the rule of law, and any shred of respect and cooperation in the eyes of the rest of the world, they must also be held accountable to the fullest extent of the laws of our land.
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

 

www.johnperryonline.com

Radio professional, music lover, truth seeker, politically unaffiliated, unyielding defender of the United States Constitution. If you'd like to know more, visit my website and click on the "Why I'm Here" link...

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Path FROM 9/11

"Official" 9/11 story On Life support; The Truth is Taking Over

The Government's 9/11 Facade is Crumbling

The Ugliest Truth

Calling Out the Cons

"Liberal" is Not a Four-Letter Word

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments