Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

Unlawful Enemy Combatant in the White House

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

He would of course never be tried as such, given that it's his own bogus law, but one would be hard pressed to find a stronger homegrown example of "unlawful enemy combatant", as defined by the Military Commissions Act of 2006, than George W. Bush himself.

Let's take a look at the definition, as prescribed by the twenty-first century Hitler-in-Chief squatting at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue:

Military Commissions Act of 2006
Section 948a Definitions

(1) UNLAWFUL ENEMY COMBATANT (A) The term 'unlawful enemy combatant' means:

(i) A person who has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its co-belligerents who is not a lawful enemy combatant (including a person who is part of the Taliban, Al Qaeda, or associated forces); or:

(ii) A person who, before, on or after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 has been determined to be an unlawful enemy combatant by a Combatant Status Review Tribunal or another competent tribunal established under the authority of the President or Secretary of Defense.


Notice that this definition does not specifically exclude American citizens. Of course, Bushies will argue that there are certainly people who hold American citizenship that seek to do us harm. What they're forgetting, however, is that we already have a system of law enforcement and justice to deal with these people.

But George is not concerned with that. His ultimate goal is to label any and all dissenters people who actually recognize that perhaps the most sacred responsibility of American citizenship is to publicly challenge government, especially when it is not acting in our best interests as terrorists or terrorist sympathizers and send us all to Gitmo, or one of the U.S. detention camps being built by a Halliburton subsidiary.

That's right, folks. Dare to speak out in support of liberty and justice for all, dare to remind this government that they derive their power from the consent of the governed (you and me) and that THEY work for US, dare to demand that your government adhere to the Constitution and the rule of law, and George W. Bush could label you as an "enemy combatant" and lock you up forever, or even have you killed at his whim without ever charging you with a crime.

Even if you have never left the country, never associated with or supported the cause of any terrorists in any way whatsoever, and never uttered so much as a single physically threatening word, this pathetic excuse for a president could say you are an enemy of your own country.

He could give you a "trial" with one of his kangaroo military tribunals, with hearsay "evidence" derived from torture, that he could keep you from confronting and disproving simply by labeling it "secret", but he doesn't have to. It's up to him, you see, because he's the "Decider". Sure, the new law "prohibits" torture, but it also grants the president the authority to interpret the Geneva Conventions and determine for himself what constitutes torture and what doesn't.

Interestingly, the Military Commissions Act of 2006 also grants retroactive immunity from prosecution for anyone responsible for the use torture and other war crimes (up to and including this president), the penalty for some of which is no less than death.

It would be more accurate to call it the Retroactive Torture Immunity Act of 2006.

And there, ladies and gentlemen, is the main Bush cabal motivation for this not even close to constitutional legislation. They wanted it rammed through Congress with virtually no debate whatsoever, before a midterm election in which they face the very real threat of losing majority control of both the House and Senate, just to keep their own asses off death row.

They probably also figured they could intimidate us with a purposely vague definition of "unlawful enemy combatant" so we would keep our mouths shut, for fear that we might be sent away for speaking out. But one need not fear speaking out in support of our great American values. Real patriots cannot be intimidated.

The stark reality is that there is no more heinous an enemy to the United States of America and the rest of the world right now than George W. Bush himself. He gets top billing, of course, because he is the guy pretending to be president, but this in no way lessens the culpability of his inner circle of minions. Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice, Gonzalez, and anyone else in the administration who faithfully parrots the Bushco line is equally guilty of crimes against our country.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.johnperryonline.com

Radio professional, music lover, truth seeker, politically unaffiliated, unyielding defender of the United States Constitution. If you'd like to know more, visit my website and click on the "Why I'm Here" link...

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

So? by amazin on Thursday, Oct 5, 2006 at 1:14:12 PM
Public servants are too busy serving themselves by John Perry on Thursday, Oct 5, 2006 at 5:22:28 PM
How to solve it - by amazin on Friday, Oct 6, 2006 at 1:10:44 AM