Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
October 4, 2006 at 22:00:37

View Ratings | Rate It

Unlawful Enemy Combatant in the White House

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By John Perry (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: John Perry - Writer

He would of course never be tried as such, given that it's his own bogus law, but one would be hard pressed to find a stronger homegrown example of "unlawful enemy combatant", as defined by the Military Commissions Act of 2006, than George W. Bush himself.

Let's take a look at the definition, as prescribed by the twenty-first century Hitler-in-Chief squatting at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue:

Military Commissions Act of 2006
Section 948a – Definitions


(1) UNLAWFUL ENEMY COMBATANT – (A) The term 'unlawful enemy combatant' means:

(i) A person who has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its co-belligerents who is not a lawful enemy combatant (including a person who is part of the Taliban, Al Qaeda, or associated forces); or:

(ii) A person who, before, on or after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 has been determined to be an unlawful enemy combatant by a Combatant Status Review Tribunal or another competent tribunal established under the authority of the President or Secretary of Defense.

Notice that this definition does not specifically exclude American citizens. Of course, Bushies will argue that there are certainly people who hold American citizenship that seek to do us harm. What they're forgetting, however, is that we already have a system of law enforcement and justice to deal with these people.

But George is not concerned with that. His ultimate goal is to label any and all dissenters – people who actually recognize that perhaps the most sacred responsibility of American citizenship is to publicly challenge government, especially when it is not acting in our best interests – as terrorists or terrorist sympathizers and send us all to Gitmo, or one of the U.S. detention camps being built by a Halliburton subsidiary.

That's right, folks. Dare to speak out in support of liberty and justice for all, dare to remind this government that they derive their power from the consent of the governed (you and me) and that THEY work for US, dare to demand that your government adhere to the Constitution and the rule of law, and George W. Bush could label you as an "enemy combatant" and lock you up forever, or even have you killed at his whim without ever charging you with a crime.

Even if you have never left the country, never associated with or supported the cause of any terrorists in any way whatsoever, and never uttered so much as a single physically threatening word, this pathetic excuse for a president could say you are an enemy of your own country.

He could give you a "trial" with one of his kangaroo military tribunals, with hearsay "evidence" derived from torture, that he could keep you from confronting and disproving simply by labeling it "secret", but he doesn't have to. It's up to him, you see, because he's the "Decider". Sure, the new law "prohibits" torture, but it also grants the president the authority to interpret the Geneva Conventions and determine for himself what constitutes torture and what doesn't.

Interestingly, the Military Commissions Act of 2006 also grants retroactive immunity from prosecution for anyone responsible for the use torture and other war crimes (up to and including this president), the penalty for some of which is no less than death.

It would be more accurate to call it the Retroactive Torture Immunity Act of 2006.

And there, ladies and gentlemen, is the main Bush cabal motivation for this not even close to constitutional legislation. They wanted it rammed through Congress with virtually no debate whatsoever, before a midterm election in which they face the very real threat of losing majority control of both the House and Senate, just to keep their own asses off death row.

They probably also figured they could intimidate us with a purposely vague definition of "unlawful enemy combatant" so we would keep our mouths shut, for fear that we might be sent away for speaking out. But one need not fear speaking out in support of our great American values. Real patriots cannot be intimidated.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.johnperryonline.com

John Perry is a morning radio personality in his home state of Connecticut. He started paying closer attention to life inside the Beltway (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Bush Admin"
Bush admin. farm bill plan: so is it really the reform they talked about?: An article from: Pro Farmer
by Gale Reference Team

$9.95

Number of pages: 4
Publisher: Thomson Gale

Bush admin. delays E-Verify, women's Set-Aside.: An article from: Set-Aside Alert
by Gale Reference Team

$9.95

Number of pages: 2
Publisher: Business Research Services, Inc.

Transforming Mental Health Care in America (Federal Action Agenda: 1st Steps)

$4.89

Number of pages: 83
Publisher: Mental Health Services Admin., DHHS

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

So? by amazin on Thursday, Oct 5, 2006 at 1:14:12 PM
Public servants are too busy serving themselves by John Perry on Thursday, Oct 5, 2006 at 5:22:28 PM
How to solve it - by amazin on Friday, Oct 6, 2006 at 1:10:44 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum