OpEdNews Op Eds

Hello? Hello? Helllloooo?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
- Advertisement -

I’m a fellow American citizen who has not yet given up hope about re-directing the ship of state. Won’t you please take a moment to read this Op-Ed? It contains a solution.

Before I make a point, let’s agree on some things, OK? We’re American. Being American has subjective meanings and objective meanings, but let’s stick to the latter, because that’s based on fact and what we clearly know to be true:

1. The contract between citizens and elected officials is the Supreme Law, i.e. our constitution. There is no law higher than the seven articles and twenty-seven amendments which make up the U.S. Constitution. 

2. The Constitution provides for three branches of government: the Congress, the Executive, and the Judicial. Of the individuals who people these three branches, some are elected, some are appointed, but all must swear an oath to obey the law before government issues checks for their efforts. 

3. You and I are upset with governance (if you’re not upset with governance today, you can stop reading now). We’re upset with governance because of things like a judicial branch preventing a state from determining who won electoral votes in a hotly contested presidential election, an executive branch holding closed-door meetings with private-sector energy corporations, and a legislative branch failing to standardize the electoral process, securing it once and for all from corporate interests.

These key points and many others are why we’re upset with governance. Possibly the most egregious thing about governance is that it’s failed to secure The Vote from corporate interests. We’re currently burdened with what one blogger has termed Faith-Based Voting. We shouldn’t have faith-based elections. The tallying of votes should be based on more than faith. When you check what voting systems each state currently has, you would be surprised how many are like Pennsylvania. In other words, if you have doubts, too bad. Votes are  unrecountable, unverifiable, and unauditable. Where there are paper trails, there are too many cases where proper procedure is not followed, and chain of custody is ignored. It’s easy to say it’s tin foil hat stuff to claim irregularities, but it’s just as crazy to suggest we’re getting true results. How do we get proof when votes are unrecountable, unverifiable, and unauditable? It’s like one presidential candidate says when they talk about unitary executive powers and warrantless wiretaps: you don't have to prove the power is being abused to object. It doesn't matter if you absolutely trust private corporations to tally votes, we spend more time telling people they sound paranoid than we do objecting to a system that demands scrutiny. Whether or not elections are accurate we cannot know. This has been going on for at least 6 years. Faith-Based Voting should be a thing of the past, instead it is still with us, and the silence surrounding it is deafening to those of us paying attention.

Why hasn’t the Congress drawn up blueprints for an official U.S. Voting Unit and mandated voting machine vendors to build them to spec? This is the obvious, common sense solution which would immediately extinguish many points of failure. So why hasn’t any legislation of the like made its way to the floor of the House or the Senate? It’s because corporate interests have gridlocked the legislative branch, and prevented it from acting in the public interest. Corporate interests, in the form of lobbyists, lawyers, and professional politicians, have become an aristocratic title system which operates at will.

The Constitution prohibits the establishment of aristocratic title systems or anti-republican governing bodies, though with corporate laws and charters, both are now the norm. How can anyone believe that individuals, functioning as aristocrats, in the same manner as aristocrats, with a title system and organizational scheme that’s aristocratic, somehow conclude they’re Not aristocrats? Simply because they and their system is dressed in corporate clothing? The corporatists match aristocrats in both function and arrogance, pretending to have powers they do not, and pretending the average citizen is ignorant of the pretense. Through legal hair-splitting and inaction, corporatists have technically overthrown what was once a republican government. This must be addressed with specific prohibitions, and it must be written into the Constitution. For decades we’ve seen how corporatists frustrate efforts to restrain them by statutory, legal and regulatory means. Short of armed revolution, constitutional amendment is the last recourse.

- Advertisement -

As you may or may not know, the Constitution contains the convention clause. It’s found in Article V and it states that once the requisite applications for a convention hit the doorstep of Congress, that branch “shall call a convention....” The congressional record shows all fifty states have at one time or another applied for such a convention, yet one Congress after another simply ignores them. The legal term is Laches, or ignoring something on purpose. In other words, the individuals who perpetuate our aristocratic title system of corporate governance have prevented and continue to prevent a national convention of state delegates, held on authority of Article V of the U.S. Constitution.

Traditional arguments against convoking such a convention are that it might tamper with the Constitution itself, or that such a convention might be taken over by corporate interests and subverted to such ends. These arguments are bogus, not only irrational but illogical, because a convention is simply the process of opening discussion and building consensus. Nothing discussed at a national convention can somehow accidentally become new law. For an idea to become a law it must of course first be ratified, and to ratify an amendment proposal requires 38 states agree to it. With the country as polarized as it is today, it’s likely the only idea with any chance of being ratified would be one concerned with electoral reform, one that would secure The Vote from private interests once and for all.

Of the Bell Curve of political consciousness, there will always be citizens like you and I who are paying attention, and who can see past the smoke and mirrors of our homemade aristocratic establishment. Perhaps the governing class has served us well enough over the years, but ever since it stopped a state from counting votes in a critical presidential election, and foisted upon the nation an executive administration which has repeatedly disobeyed the Constitution and the rule of law, it’s become clear the time has come to create a 28th Amendment.

Recent legal history, the denial of certiorari by the Supreme Court in October of 2006, has allowed a lower court ruling to stand, and that ruling has deemed the convention call is now discretionary, that it’s up to our aristocrats whether the nation will ever convoke an Article V Convention. In terms of political science, this means we no longer need to seek further applications from the state legislatures, we simply need to galvanize a tipping-point majority of Americans around the idea the time has come to convene. This website, http://www.articlev.org suggests how such an effort might be carried out. This website, http://www.foavc.org has further information about the subject.

Whatever you’re upset about in terms of governance, it is our position that nothing short of a national convention of state delegates is going to do anything to redirect the ship of state. Not a new executive administration, and certainly not legislation from a branch where corruption has become institutionalized. An Article V Convention is anathema to the corporatists. What corporate power is dead-set against, authentic Americans should be all for.

- Advertisement -

Perhaps we’ll have to wait for our less astute, fellow citizens to come round to the truth that the next president will not and cannot bring about the end to corporate rule. This would likely be ten to twelve months from now. Hopefully everyone concerned will be here, ready to dust off our Constitution and put it to work for us.


I'm a writer/artist/activist from California, with a degree in Creative Studies from the University of California at Santa Barbara. I've been an advocating for the convention clause of Article V since 2001.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Patricia Arquette & Chuck Norris Engaged

Hamlet 3:2

Hamlet 5:2

Note to Naomi Wolf

Short Playscript On Torture

Radiant and Piercing


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 people are discussing this page, with 38 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

for the emergency convention for years! Glad to se... by Mark Sashine on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 9:44:48 AM
please check the links, and help popularize the id... by john de herrera on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:31:57 PM
would be subverted by corporate interests? They... by Richard Mynick on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:44:59 AM
First, we must start from the current condition of... by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:59:30 AM
would render difficult the "ordinary corporat... by Richard Mynick on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:32:02 PM
You seem to have dived into the deepest end of the... by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:58:26 PM
Better to die on your feet than live on your knees... by kwalsh on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:58:18 PM
as bringing in an outside auditor. the dynamic it ... by john de herrera on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:25:20 PM
take a step back and consider what would take plac... by john de herrera on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:04:52 PM
I'll vote for that and the first thing on ... by Sandy Sand on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:50:33 PM
a vote of confidence towards the convention clause... by john de herrera on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:12:45 PM
Some of you out there think we are a bunch of airh... by macdon1 on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:22:42 PM
but I would say elections have been rigged for a l... by Stanimal on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:16:42 PM
i go right along with much of your thinking.as far... by john de herrera on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:17:17 PM
We don't need Congress permission or approval to h... by Ty on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 9:46:15 PM
that once the requisite applications are on record... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:59:02 PM
A bipartisan Congress and the Bush Administration ... by Rady Ananda on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:19:23 PM
thanks for your comment, but let's take a clos... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:24:07 PM
This is a trojan horse issue. A constitutional con... by Arthur M. Howard-(Scotoni) on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:19:23 PM
once the convention convenes, the delegates build ... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:55:21 PM
the concerns I raised about a Convention. I'm ... by Richard Mynick on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:25:09 PM
for the time you took to reply richard. i think i&... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:45:15 PM
you said some americans openly laugh at the consti... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:32:47 PM
I must admit that I have long forgotten most of th... by Kris Malmquist on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:56:38 AM
please take some time to educate yourself about th... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:26:40 PM
What John & Joel have said is true. Yet Richar... by Tony Forest on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:09:00 AM
it is about popularizing the right idea at the rig... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:32:30 PM
I agree Tony. The main thing most are overlooking ... by arlen custer on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:17:06 AM
open discussion, i.e. an Article V Convention will... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:39:55 PM
Thank you for such an insightful and hopeful messa... by Patrick Roberts on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:39:04 AM
for saying so. your comment makes me feel the same... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:35:33 PM
Guys, I admire your optimism.But I do not believe ... by Randje Mitchell on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 5:34:53 PM
I agree, remember though that the outside world is... by kwalsh on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:45:50 PM
the constitution and the rule of law can never be ... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:05:33 PM
"The rule of law cannot be destroyed, only ig... by Randje Mitchell on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:48:02 PM
Well guys for me it goes way beyond keeping a chec... by arlen custer on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 5:54:02 PM
if what you're saying is true, the obvious cou... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:23:00 PM
A convention. YES. But clearly it is the elites fa... by arlen custer on Wednesday, Apr 30, 2008 at 7:48:05 AM