Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

SHAMELESS ALL RIGHT, BUT NOT FOR BIG TOBACCO--THE NYTIMES GETS IT WRONG AGAIN

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

November 8, 2007
Editorial
Big Tobacco Defeats Sick Kids

One of the biggest disappointments in Tuesday’s election was the defeat of an Oregon ballot initiative that would have raised the state’s cigarette tax by 85 cents a pack to help pay for health care for uninsured children.

The outcome is a testament, more than anything else, to the shamelessness of the nation’s big tobacco companies. They spent an obscene amount of money on deceptive television ads designed to protect their profits, even at the expense of poor children. The results should not be allowed to diminish national concern about insuring those youngsters.

Tobacco firms led by Philip Morris and R.J. Reynolds poured $12 million into defeating the initiative — about $3.33 for every Oregon resident, or $24 a vote. That’s about a dollar more per capita than the $60 million tobacco companies invested to defeat a similar California measure last year, according to The Associated Press. The health and civic groups fighting for health care for children were able to spend only a quarter of that.

--read entire article--

___________________________________________________________________

The desperation of a nation short-changed into the flim-flam of inadequate 'health insurance' takes increasingly bizarre turns at the voting booth. Consider the idiocy of tagging smokers with the bill for children's health care.

"Shamelessness of the nation’s big tobacco companies," indeed. The shameless are legion in this Richard Nixon inspired sham that purports to be a health system, but big-tobacco, with all its faults, is not at fault here. Smokers are supposed to pay an additional 85 cents a pack to insure the uninsured? Next on the list

  • Firearms manufacturers will pay for prisons
  • Gated communities will be taxed to support wildlife funds
  • Coal mines will cover the cost of Aid for Dependent Children
. . . and reckless drivers will be fined in order to support the elderly.

We need universal single-payer health care in this country and the desperation of ballot issues such as the Oregon ballot initiative merely proves the point. "Initiative" is defined as the "readiness to embark on bold new ventures" and god knows, if initiative were ever needed it is in the field of health care.

Where initiative fails us in all the permutations of the word.

That would start with calling it 'care' instead of 'insurance.' Let me define insurance for you;
Promise of reimbursement in the case of loss; paid to people or companies so concerned about hazards that they have made prepayments to an insurance company.
We have no need for the reimbursement of loss, after deducting an insurers profits, the payroll for employees paid to disallow our claim and the myriad escape clauses for pre-existing conditions.

A pre-existing condition is the very reason for care.

Wake up people. Smokers are not the reason kids are uncared for. Insurance is the reason kids are uncared for and we need to do away with it, providing SINGLE-PAYER NATIONAL HEALTH CARE FOR ALL CITIZENS.


* For more in-depth articles by Jim on Health Care, check out Opinion-Columns.com

 

http://www.jim-freeman.com

Jim Freeman's op-ed pieces and commentaries have appeared in The New York Times, Chicago Tribune, International Herald-Tribune, CNN, The New York Review, The Jon Stewart Daily Show and a number of magazines. His thirteen published books are (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

WASHINGTON POST DEAD-WRONG IN CHILD PORNO EDITORIAL

The Trans Pacific Partnership, Yet another Opportunity to Chop-Shop America

Eric Holder Exposes A Nation of Law, Going Lawless

Liar's Poker at the Federal Reserve--"Can't anybody here play this game?"

Dressing Up Space Defense in Dominatrix Clothing

ARRIVAL TIME, 2010; A VIABLE THIRD-PARTY OPTION

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
I agree that we need a single payer not for profit... by Ty on Saturday, Nov 10, 2007 at 9:50:59 AM
I am sorry but I have to disagree with you on this... by beccy on Saturday, Nov 10, 2007 at 5:02:13 PM
I am sorry but I have to disagree with you on this... by beccy on Saturday, Nov 10, 2007 at 5:02:24 PM
with taxing cigarettes.I have a big problem with t... by Jim Freeman on Saturday, Nov 10, 2007 at 6:02:42 PM