Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ;
Group(s): Add to My Group
July 22, 2007 at 10:46:49

View Ratings | Rate It

The Case for Not Waiting Out This Presidency

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Jim Freeman (about the author)     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Jim Freeman - Writer

It’s almost too apparent to compare current refusals-to-submit of the Bush-Cheney White House with the bad old days of Richard Nixon stonewalling similar inquiry. Both used ‘executive privilege’ as an excuse to ward off the evil minions who would do them dirt—dastardly organizations like the House of Representatives, the Senate and the courts.

Both stood in front of the cameras, fighting to sound logical in the face of confused, disconnected and garbled argument. Both had Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld in their administrations; young zealots under Nixon and harnessed again as old experienced hands under Bush. Both had their arrogant positions denied in the courts and both sought to circumvent the courts in their last days of desperate decline. Both ultimately came up against Congress, as the founding fathers require, to be checked and balanced.

Impeachment, which is now on everyone’s table except Nancy Pelosi’s, has been brilliantly put into focus by John Nichols. John is the author of The Genius of Impeachment and recently the guest of Bill Moyers on PBS. Moyers devoted a full hour to the subject and Nichols makes the point that we have wrongly stated the case;

    “Impeachment is not a constitutional crisis, impeachment is the cure for a constitutional crisis.”

Nixon resigned rather than face impeachment. Bush thinks he can ride it out and fully intends to do so. But this president has been wrong in virtually every judgment he has made over the course of his six and a half years in office.

The circle wasn’t properly closed on Nixon and that was a mistake that must not be made again. Congress felt the need to try him even after he resigned, but President Ford was perhaps too quick with a pardon and the point became moot. That necessary constitutional circle hasn’t even been drawn on Bush-Cheney.

Cheney says he isn’t liable to oversight because he’s not of the executive and not of the legislative, although he occupies an office in each and the Constitution has named his office as executive. Absurd on the face of it, but law is not law until and unless it is enforced.

Bush claims the Attorney General’s Office may not prosecute any purported crime that has its source within privileged discussion. Not surprisingly, all discussion of all issues falls under his definition of executive privilege and thus an entire two-term presidency is (in his view) exempt from oversight.

Naming every document ‘secret’ has also served to obstruct the courts when Bush has been challenged. Clinton (1995) classified 3.5 million documents secret, compared to a stunning 14.2 million by Bush in 2005 alone.

Constitutional crisis is not only at the door, it’s scratching and howling to be recognized. Those who claim country has suffered too much are dead wrong—the country hasn’t suffered nearly enough to make it fully understand the depth and seriousness of crimes unpunished. Each and every illegal grab of yet more presidential power accrues to the next presidency. That president may well take a benign position, but the additional powers will have been cast in stone by precedent—unchallenged precedent. Death by a thousand small cuts.

Don't look to Congress for redress. Congress is (and has always been) feckless in time of need, dithering, fretting and sucking its thumb when bold action was called for. Not its fault. The storied halls of compromise and conceit, of deal-making and delay, of payola and pride were designed to be the modifier rather than the cure for every flamboyance. The House and Senate are two stomachs of the ruminating legislative cow, munching away within the green pastures of rabid right and liberal left.

Legislation is thus made a cud, regurgitated repeatedly, to be chewed again. That’s the congressional job. Chew and occasionally be milked of special-interest cream.

Public opinion will impeach this crew and regardless of my former argument, public opinion has begun to swing. Opinion is prescient in that it isn’t the war that’s turned their head, but Scooter Libby’s commuted sentence. Libby and Valerie Plame are but a tiny piece of mismanagement compared to the debacle in Iraq, but they are the right piece, the correct piece, the kiss-my-ass and stick-it-in-your ear piece.

Misleading America into war was a regrettable failure of judgment, but bad choices are hardly impeachable. Bad choices are paid for at election time, not in the judicial chamber of a more-than-equally complicit Senate. Impeachment is reserved for ‘high crimes and misdemeanors,’ neither of which are defined as bad choices.

Put the war aside in perspective. The arrogant and deceitful run-up to the war is less important than some of the crimes committed in the pursuit of that war. The president and vice-president are potentially guilty of actual high crimes, according to this partial listing from http://www.impeachbush.org ;

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Jim Freeman's op-ed pieces and commentaries have appeared in The New York Times, Chicago Tribune, International Herald-Tribune, CNN, The New York Review, The Jon Stewart Daily Show and a number of magazines.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Congress Impeachment"
Impeachment will let Congress reassert itself.: An article from: New Hampshire Business Review
by Burt Cohen

$9.95

Number of pages: 3
Publisher: Thomson Gale

Impeachment and Trial of Andrew Johnson
by United States Congress

$83.79

Number of pages: 288
Publisher: Dover Publications Inc.

Impeachment and the U.S. Congress
by inc Congressional Quarterly

$0.51

Number of pages: 60
Publisher:

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
17 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Let's go get the bastards Now! by tedbohne on Sunday, Jul 22, 2007 at 11:37:27 AM
urgency of impeachment by Sheila Jackson on Sunday, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:12:56 PM
If the Congress refuses to impeach, they force the public to by Richard Mynick on Sunday, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:19:01 PM
bush cheney OUT - LAWS image 4 U 2 RE: by RogerART.com on Sunday, Jul 22, 2007 at 1:12:06 PM
Storm the Caslte by Gareece on Sunday, Jul 22, 2007 at 1:26:58 PM
You demonstrate that Dem Party apologists are as dishonest by Richard Mynick on Sunday, Jul 22, 2007 at 4:32:26 PM
Got the wrong guy, pard by Jim Freeman on Tuesday, Jul 24, 2007 at 7:41:10 AM
(Chuckle!) No, there's a logical misunderstanding here! by Richard Mynick on Wednesday, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:02:21 AM
Impeachment Postcards to Pelosi by grassroots on Sunday, Jul 22, 2007 at 1:56:56 PM
downloading people by sbaker on Sunday, Jul 22, 2007 at 9:37:08 PM
Impeachment NOW or Our Democracy Is Doomed by Robert R. Regl on Sunday, Jul 22, 2007 at 9:20:40 PM
Impeachment by Susan Wall on Monday, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:12:59 AM
Karl Rove trivialization by Jim Freeman on Tuesday, Jul 24, 2007 at 8:06:15 AM
Newt said that. by Sheila Jackson on Sunday, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:09:53 PM
What can we do to prompt Congress to impeach? by Ben Bayol on Tuesday, Jul 24, 2007 at 10:04:58 AM
What to do. by Sheila Jackson on Monday, Jul 30, 2007 at 12:52:52 PM
What to do by Jim Freeman on Monday, Jul 30, 2007 at 2:19:34 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum