Tags for This Article:

History (736) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s):
Add to My Group
October 9, 2007 at 18:21:36

American Model of Democracy Is Not The End of History

by Hamad Alomar     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

Democracy without wisdom and justice is chaos. Democracy is the rule of law and equal opportunity for every one. US democracy is not the ultimate one. It is quite the opposite to what Francis Fukuyama thinks.  With the faults, deadlocks and misgivings of American democracy as it unfolds, the history has just begun. Money and the Media play a major role in American democracy .

 

He who has the money and controls the media can influence the course of the political scene.  The number one enemy for democracy is greed.  The second one is ignorance. The third is intolerance. We should not be lead by the success of American democracy or discouraged by Iraq failures when we try to evaluate democracy.  American democracy has succeeded because of four factors which are not available to any other country in the world.  Hence it is a mistake to expect others to follow the American model. 

 

The first and most important is America is a nation of immigrants who escaped prosecution or came for better living.  There are no tribal groups or religious sects or extended families. Such a mixed and a varied population is always peaceful and mainly concerned with fairness, and is unique to the US.   The second is America's geographic location with two oceans and two neighbors only which make external threats minimum.  Third, America is rich in resources.  Fourth, the unit of democracy which is the citizen, is well-educated in the US.  So it is unfair to expect poor countries or countries in a highly volatile region or countries in which a high ratio of the population is illiterate or countries with clear ethnic or religious division to follow the US example.

 

America may have intended to make Iraq a model for democracy in the region.  What happened is that America's failure in Iraq proved the opposite and became a major setback for democracy in the region instead of the otherwise.  This doesn't mean that the people of other countries should give in to authoritarian rulers and dictators.  Rather, they should start from the same principle which is how can we achieve the rule of law, equal opportunity for every one,  separation of the three powers and freedom of the press.  Then review all possible forms of governments that may achieve that.

 

I can speak for my country Saudi Arabia where one always read that the country is ruled by a family or the ruler has absolute power or the ruler combines all three powers and controls the press. What people are missing is that Saudi Arabia is also unique in its history and establishment. The ruling family didn't take over the country.  Saudi Arabia was created and founded from scratch.  Before the founder of Saudi Arabia, King Abdulaziz Al Saud started his mission of unifying Saudi Arabia at the beginning of the last century, the land was mainly composed of fighting tribes and small cities scattered across the Arabian peninsula. Therefore the people of Saudi Arabia appreciate the role this family has played in unifying the country and Saudis will not disagree that this ruling house represents the unity of the country.  So we are trying to work out our own model of democracy that will preserve our identity and will take into consideration our history and we believe a combination of tribal values and modern politics suits us best.

 

Hamad S Alomar

 

Peace Loving Saudi Citizen

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments

Just a person that knows he matters and placing more on acceptance than expectation... And while this explanation is viewed apparently by some as limited, here's some more personal information that those same some believe I "need" to testify that I can post here at OpEdNews.com:
I have an undergraduate degree (BA even - not a foppish BS) in biology/environmental science with an emphasis on environmental/ecological systems (they are, like, um, so complex), a master's degree in public he...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Tom MurphyJust a person that knows he matters and placing more on acceptance than expectation... And while this explanation is viewed apparently by some as limited, here's some more personal information that those same some believe I "need" to testify that I can post here at OpEdNews.com:
I have an undergraduate degree (BA even - not a foppish BS) in biology/environmental science with an emphasis on environmental/ecological systems (they are, like, um, so complex), a master's degree in public he...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Self determination

I agree wholeheartedly that American democracy is not the end of history, but no one (especially an American) has ever claimed it to be the ultimate form of democracy. The virtue of American democracy has been and may be extolled, but I have yet to see the claim that it is the penultimate of democracy.

Additionally, I believe the American people and policy makers also understand that American's version of democracy is not for other countries. "America may have intended to make Iraq a model for democracy in the region." America wants Iraq to succeed as a democracy because this form of government captures the will of the people best; not because it is American in thought or can be used to manipulate a region. If democracy succeeds in a region where it has been historically absent, then the accepting country's leadership in that region is established by default.

There's something to be said about the successes of countries that embrace democracy as opposed to those that do not.

And yet, that potential leadership is why the powerbases of other countries in the region do not want democracy to succeed. And please note that it IS Iraqi democracy and NOT American democracy that these other countries reject outright – sometimes even violently. If you review the Iraqi Constitution, it's tailored for Iraqis - http://www.export.gov/iraq/pdf/iraqi_constitution.pdf by Iraqis. Americans may have advised the Iraqi parliament on what the constitution should reflect or its format, but it was the Iraqi people that determined its content.

"What happened is that America's failure in Iraq proved the opposite and became a major setback for democracy in the region instead of the otherwise." On the surface, it may appear to be America's failure, but in light of the fact that Iraqi democracy is present, it's truly Iraq's failure and its people will bear the major burden of the cost of failure. Note that any failure is a separate issue entirely from whether or not the Iraqi people ever even professed a desire for any democracy that some may argue (fairly) was thrust upon them.

But if there is failure (which still has yet to be determined), it's not from the imposition of American democracy in Iraq. Rather, the failure would be from regional interests largely external (although internal entities exist as well) to Iraq that disagree with democracy – in any form - http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Area=sd&ID=SP45703 . While the holy text is used by these interests and entities to justify their opposition to America and its version of democracy, it's a slight of hand maneuver designed to distract the real issue which focuses squarely on power and control of the people and region. The manipulation of a people's religious beliefs and faith has been perfected over the centuries by those in power within the region to ensure their continued hold on their respective peoples and locales.

The very real threat of militant Islam (which had already manifested itself repeatedly in years past) to not just American but global interests that frequented the region (and indeed globe where state-sponsored tactics were applied) is why America decided to intervene in what many claimed incorrectly was a national or at worst regional issue. Once the intervention had occurred (occupation has such imperialistic overtones), America was committed to stabilizing the country. To extricate itself and leave the resulting political vacuum would not serve America's interests and SURELY not Iraq's. And when the country's government needed to be rebuilt (admittedly, yes, because of American intervention), what form should be adopted so that the people receive the greatest benefits – benefits both here and in the afterlife? Democracy.

I believe that the Iraqi people who elected their representatives last year "are trying to work out [their] own model of democracy that will preserve [their] identity and will take into consideration [their] history... values and modern politics [that] suits [them] best." To dismiss the sacrifices that have been made to date by both the Iraqi and America people as being nothing more then one country (infidels notwithstanding) imposing the "ultimate" democracy upon an un-wanting other only cheapens the nobility and principle of the government reorganization, its associated endeavors, and goal of improving a peoples' lives.

by Tom Murphy (3 articles, 3 quicklinks, 9 diaries, 1547 comments) on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 10:03:13 AM
 


Just a person that knows he matters and placing more on acceptance than expectation... And while this explanation is viewed apparently by some as limited, here's some more personal information that those same some believe I "need" to testify that I can post here at OpEdNews.com:
I have an undergraduate degree (BA even - not a foppish BS) in biology/environmental science with an emphasis on environmental/ecological systems (they are, like, um, so complex), a master's degree in public he...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Tom MurphyJust a person that knows he matters and placing more on acceptance than expectation... And while this explanation is viewed apparently by some as limited, here's some more personal information that those same some believe I "need" to testify that I can post here at OpEdNews.com:
I have an undergraduate degree (BA even - not a foppish BS) in biology/environmental science with an emphasis on environmental/ecological systems (they are, like, um, so complex), a master's degree in public he...

to see more of bio, click on member name

American democracy revealed!

For a solid piece of what many here will label "propaganda", visit the following web site that discusses American democracy:

http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/democracy/

Read what Melvin Urofsky has to say about American democracy from the web site...

"Democracy, certainly in its American form, is never a finished product, but is always evolving."

"No one claims that the American model, as successful as it has been for the United States, is the model that all democracies should follow. Each nation must fashion a government out of its own culture and history."

"The exact manner in which laws are made, for example, can vary widely, but no matter what the forms, they must obey the root principle that the citizenry has to be involved in the process and feel ownership of those laws."

"Other nations as they experiment with democracy -- and it is always an experiment -- will need to examine how the attributes described in these papers can best be created and sustained in their own culture."

Shocking! Yes, I know.

by Tom Murphy (3 articles, 3 quicklinks, 9 diaries, 1547 comments) on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 10:14:47 AM
 


I'm a 29 year old male. 
TyI'm a 29 year old male. 

Democracy

People need to get a brain. America is not a democracy. America is a plutocratic oligarchy in the form of a Republic. A Republic is not a Democracy. Democracy is government of the people, by the people, and for the people. A Republic is government by elected politicians for corporations and other wealthy special interest groups.

 

by Ty (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 703 comments) on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 11:22:46 AM
 


Peace Loving Saudi Citizen
Hamad AlomarPeace Loving Saudi Citizen

Thannks Tom

Thanks Tom for this valuable insight into the issue

 However, a failure is a failure no matter who caused it

Let us say America failed to push Iraqis for democracy

Or, America failed to predict how difficult it is going to be

by Hamad Alomar (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 6 diaries, 18 comments) on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 12:05:32 PM
 

 

4 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Anne Kilkenny Full Email on Sarah Palin by Rady Ananda

John McCain: Morally, Mentally, and Emotionally Unfit by Jim Fetzer

Iran War ~ How It Will Unfold by Lord Stirling

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing by Anthony Wade

Librarians Against Palin Founder a Mystery by Judy Swindler

Is McCain Campaign Interfering In Alaska Troopergate Investigation of Palin? by Rob Kall

Protester who interrupted McCain's speech is an Iraq War Veteran by Mary MacElveen

Why We're Planning to Prosecute Cheney and Bush by David Swanson

Live OEN Street Medic Report From Occupied St Paul by Michael Cavlan

High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's Theory Falls Apart by Len Hart

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Diaries
Polls Events
All Op-Eds
News Life/Arts/Science
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails
  

Go To Top 50 Most Popular