OpEdNews » Democracy Interrupted

Support OEN
With Your
Tax-Deductible Donation

Tags for This Article:

Populum Tag Cloud Control Panel
	Fine tune your search to access content

Articles	Links
Diaries	Products
Events	All

All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs

From:
Month Day Year

To:
Month Day Year

Alphabet Popularity	Count ON Count OFF
This Level	Sub-levels

Tag(s): Bush Enemy Of Civil Rights; Congress Failed Oversight Democracy; Constitution In Crisis; Dictator Dictatorships; Executive Privilege; Executive Tyranny; Impeachment; People John Bolton; Right Wing Selling Off America
Add to My Group

July 25, 2007 at 06:03:05

Democracy Interrupted

by Frank J. Ranelli Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

SAVE FAVORITES

VIEW FAVORITES

View Ratings | Rate It

Why we as a nation, have been titrated, which is the gradual increasing of dosage, pressure, and propaganda, till the desired effect – an inured and compliant society – have willingly bequeathed away our autonomy of self-government, embraced the genesis of tyranny, and begin our seemingly inexorable march towards dictatorship.

Part IV of the "American Democracy in Crisis" series.

::::

If the past is prologue, then the present may be prescient. Each day, many of us awaken to a queasy feeling of unrest, knowing that the rule of law is under assault. The Constitution is in jeopardy and our unassailable rights to an egalitarian society are quickly being abolished. Television, newspapers, blogs, and a litany of books are reminiscent in our collective conscience that America has been browbeaten into trading peace for war, liberties for securities, sovereignty for safety, and blood for oil.

Our reputation on the world’s stage is indelibly stained by pernicious acts of imperialism, hegemony, blind patriotism, and outright incompetence by Washington’s power brokers and their agents of avarice. Yet, beyond dystopian polls and sparse demonstrations, Americans seem unwilling to accept and are extraordinarily unaware, that tyranny is taking root here in America.

We have ran the gamut of – and sadly sanctioned – some of the most unconceivable and heinous measures in American history. The Military Commissions Act, The Patriot Act, The Domestic Wiretapping Program, ignored the Geneva Conventions, revoked habeas corpus and engaged in torture. We removed our selves from the world’s courts, attacked and now occupy a country that never posed a grave or imminent danger to our own nation and then failed to adequately care for the pointlessly wounded soldiers, evident by the Walter Reed Hospital debacle.

The Justice Department enacted by law and created in1870, to make certain fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans was carried out under the law, has been purely politicized. It has been altered and grotesquely mutated into a blanket of immunity for loyalty and allegiance to an autocratic president that has throttled our nation to the point of snuffing out all legitimacy of our national system of jurisprudence.

Alberto Gonzales, the empty suite at the head of the Department of Justice, appointed by President Bush and confirmed by the United States Senate in 2005, not only repeated lies with impunity, but also obediently abdicates his sworn duty. He obsequiously yielded to Bush’s wild assertions of executive privilege and steadfastly refused to pursue Congress’ mandated contempt citations for Harriet Miers and Josh Bolton. Justice, by these lawless actions, is not being served, but is abruptly being handed its hat.

The commutation of I. Scooter Libby, an obstructionist of the law and felon, reminds us that justice is no longer in service in the interest of integrity and impartiality. Justice is now enslaved to the bidding of the Bush Administration and serves only to provide shelter and safe haven for loyal soldiers within a rogue, Mafioso-style executive branch.

Pre-emptive war planning operatives, such as John Yoo, David Addington, Paul Wolfowitz, the infamous “Torture Memo”, the radical “Unitary Executive Theory”, unconstitutional signing statements, the shocking Abu Ghraib torture pictures, The Project for a New America Century’s outlandish, 1998 white paper entitled, Rebuilding America’s Defenses, all signify we are on an inexorable march towards dictatorship.

It should now be brutally apparent and undoubtedly understood by all that the Bush Administration is not merely above the law; it is the law. Our seven-year autocracy has now morphed into full despotism. Bush and his actors of austerity, beyond all doubt, are desperados who are unrestrained and unfettered, severing all ties with restraint and decency, decorum and sound judgment. The nascent Nixon enterprising years of imperialism and lawlessness are feeble by contrast.

We have rhetoric from armchair members of Congress who assert, “This administration has weakened America in a way that is frightful[1]”, and then refuse to breathe life into the comatose corpse of a once proud and functioning democracy by taking impeachment, the people’s remedy for the infringement of our independence, “off the table.” Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and the rest of the Democrats are quite content to allow Bush to self-destruct, in full view of the nation, while the U.S wreaks havoc in the Middle-East, in order to create what they falsely believe will be a landslide election weighted heavily for the Democrats by Bush's massive blunders and political collapse.

Thirty plus years after Nixon's failed coup d'état, George W. Bush has taken the idea of a tyrannical, presidential despot, at the helm of the Executive Branch, to dizzying heights and abject lows in America in the 21st century. Bush has now fully entrenched himself – in a twisted, extravagant, bravado-ridden version of Richard Nixon – by stonewalling every action Congress takes, as a totalitarian ruler, more bellicose and bombastic than his previous six years of pompous swagger and reckless governing.

The juxtaposition of these two loggerheads – an ineffectual Congress and an imperial President – leads to the will of the people being usurped, subjugated, and silenced. The People no longer have a voice in this government, for it is no longer our government as much as it is no longer a democracy. What America has become is an autocracy operated by lobbyists, mega-corporations, the military-industrial complex, and the whores in Washington that these power brokers, in a very fascist way, have bought politicians’ loyalty, acquiescence, and obedience. Contrary to the revisionist history so may of us are indoctrinated with, and unswervingly clutch to without reason or true examination of the facts, is our nation is run by an oligarchy.

Our will as a nation is not being done for a very simple reason. We, as a nation, have been titrated – the gradual increasing of dosages, pressure, and propaganda – till the desired effect, an inured and complicit society, have willingly bequeathed away our autonomy of self-government. We have bestowed our birthright to despotic rulers who do not find fear in – or seek shelter from – the near unanimous disapproval of the people they suppress and subdue[2]. They seek not the consent of the people for they seek only allegiance and adherence to their own reprehensible, egocentric, and depraved pursuits for power, money, and authoritarian control. Never in America's past has an assault on the truth and freedom been waged so viciously nor have the American people been so reprehensibly divided and utterly deceived by men we never truly elected in the first place.

What is prescient about the present is the deafening silence in which we fail to speak out, take action, or demand accountability. George Bush and Dick Cheney are the epitome of, the embodiment of, the exact personification of, what the founders feared in an autocratic oppressor, the rise of a despot to the presidency, and how that despot would come to exist. The framers of the Constitution gave us all the tools we need, without the shedding of blood, to ensure the rights and freedoms of the people remained intact and attempts at tyranny or oppression were rejected and ultimately beaten back.

We have to begin to change the framing of peoples’ mind first, and then explain the actions that need to be taken. No matter what or how somber the facts are, if the framing, the paradigm within which people operate is not changed, then no transformation will take place.

The only proper instrument for accountability and transformation – when a president becomes despotic in his actions – is impeachment, trial, and removal for failure to respect and honor the Constitution and faithfully execute the laws of the land. Impeachment is a just and necessary remedy and we must immediately diverge away from the idea that it takes away from other work Congress should and can be doing. When you have a president who openly flouts and disobeys the law, intentionally attempts to erase the separation of powers of our tripartite government and assume dictatorial powers, no legitimate work, which will stand as the rule of law for all men, can be realized.

Here is the straightforward reason why impeachment is a mandate to return to a working democracy: No matter what legislation Congress passes, Bush will veto it, ignore it, or add a dubious “signing statement”, making unilateral claims he may disregard it or claim the bill is "unconstitutional", plainly bypassing the judicial process of the Supreme Court, as well. As many historians have appropriately point out, not even King George III of England had or assumed these kinds of authoritarian powers.

The fabric of democracy is feeling the strain and we must unburden our country, through impeachment, from a despotic president and a dangerous vice-president who uses fear and subjugation to rule by and not the rule of law to govern our nation by. There can and must be far more significant consequences for all of these abuses of power and executive anarchy, or the actions of Bush and Cheney will simply become historical precedence for future abuses by future presidents, whether a republican or a democrat.

[1] Senator Russ Feingold (D) of Wisconsin, on Meet the Press, July 22, 2007

[2] 71% of Americans Disapprove of the Way Bush is Handling His Job; July 23, 2007, American Research Group

http://www.ranellirants.blogspot.com/

	Contact Author
	Contact Editor
	View Other Articles by Author

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

(More...)

9 comments

A one-eyed man in a world of the blind is king, but a rational man in a world of the irrational is a fool.
rabblerowzerA one-eyed man in a world of the blind is king, but a rational man in a world of the irrational is a fool.

Silky Sullivan, All American.

Silky Sullivan (February 28, 1955 – November 18, 1977) was an American thoroughbred race horse, considered by many to be the come-from-behind runner of come-from-behind runners, the closer of closers.

Out of all the legendary closers-Whirlaway, Stymie, and Needles before him, his contemporary Gallant Man, and Forego and John Henry after him-none could hang so far back, let the field get so far ahead, and then decide to overtake the rest of the runners like a bullet shot from a gun. Called the "California Comet" and ridden often in his career by the great Hall of Fame jockey, Willie Shoemaker, Silky once galloped along in a race until the field was 41 lengths in front of him-and still won by three lengths. To accomplish such heart-stopping feats, he had to clock the last quarter in 22 seconds flat. On one occasion, it was a hair over 20 seconds flat. His trainer, the West Coast veteran Reggie Cornell, said, "I've never seen a horse in my life, or heard of one either, go faster."

The Shoe[1] once said of Silky, "You can't do a thing with him, you just have to allow him to run his own race, at his own speed, in his own style in the first quarter or maybe the first three eighths. And you just sit there and wait, hoping you won't have to wait too long, because when he really gets going you have to be alert or he might just leave you behind-and then you hold on for dear life."

Silky could also leave the starting gate like any other racehorse, run a few yards, and then virtually slow to a mosey for a while, never doing more than loping along, despite the best efforts of his jockey, finally coming in a very distant last. Whether it was due to an arthritic condition (one theory) or whether it was because he was a born showman (another, very popular, theory-which holds up rather well since Silky always did his stuff in front of the grandstand), or whether it was because he caught a cold as a two-year-old and forever after could not breathe properly until well into a race, or whether he was a natural born sprinter entered into long races he had to learn to win by saving his incredible power for the last minute (a very credible theory), with Silky, nothing was ever predictable.

And yet out of his 27 career starts, he was in the money 18 times with 12 Wins, 1 Place, and 5 Shows. His career earnings were $157,700. Purses were much smaller when Silky raced, but it wasn't the money or the wins that made Silky "Silky." It was the style.

Silky's running in the $130,500 Santa Anita Derby was Silky Sullivan to a T. In the first five furlongs, he fell 28 lengths off the pace. But when Bill Shoemaker rattled his bit and gave him a little chirrup, asking him to please speed it up (no hitting Silky with a whip, he might just stop), he took off, flying past horse after horse with his incredible distance-consuming stride. But instead of looping the field, Silky cut to the inside, then zigzagged through the pack like a halfback until he was three and one half lengths in front at the Finish Line-and going away.

Shoemaker once said Silky got so far behind that he couldn't see another horse...not because of dirt in his face but because the whole field was so far ahead. Silky won.

It was his intelligence that made Silky Silky. Willie Shoemaker swore, "He knows when to move inside and then out. He knows when to make his winning move."

*On a note of optimism just remember: Silky Sullivan was an American, and so are you.
.

by rabblerowzer (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 227 comments) on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 8:08:07 AM

60 yr old baby boomerRETIRED, Cowboy, Welder, Carpenter, Truck Driver, Bounty Hunter & Repo Man,Saddle Maker, Heavy Equipment Operator,& Womanizer.As a rebellious youth, raised my share of hell & learned life is not cut & dried. There is right, wrong, & my way.I learned the real facts of life. Females live for their fantasies & Men are forced to deal with reality.I believe anyone who follows one political party is a fool being led to the slaughter. It's every American...

to see more of bio, click on member name
Mitch LaRoche60 yr old baby boomerRETIRED, Cowboy, Welder, Carpenter, Truck Driver, Bounty Hunter & Repo Man,Saddle Maker, Heavy Equipment Operator,& Womanizer.As a rebellious youth, raised my share of hell & learned life is not cut & dried. There is right, wrong, & my way.I learned the real facts of life. Females live for their fantasies & Men are forced to deal with reality.I believe anyone who follows one political party is a fool being led to the slaughter. It's every American...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Re: Democracy Interupted

We are & have been since our Nations conception a Republic. Not a Democracy! You, like all Americans have been deliberately mislead to believe we are a Democracy.

Please type "Republic Vs Democracy" into your search engine.

After reading at a few sites you'll find, your going to have the ammunition to make your fight for Freedom even stronger. You will realize how this two party system was deliberately put into place to enable Govt. to dictate rather then serve us. Your time won't be wasted.

by Mitch LaRoche (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 22 comments) on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 9:52:05 AM

Frank J. Ranelli is an opinion editorial writer, a research author and critic. He is a former senior editor and current feature writer for the popular online news website, OpEdNews.com. His erudite and chic style of writing has been lauded and extensively published in a variety of news outlets and across the Internet. These include the Naples Daily News, The Online Journal, Information Clearing House, Alternet, The Smirking Chimp, Diatribune, and the former progressive journal of thought, Wicked...

to see more of bio, click on member name
Frank J. RanelliFrank J. Ranelli is an opinion editorial writer, a research author and critic. He is a former senior editor and current feature writer for the popular online news website, OpEdNews.com. His erudite and chic style of writing has been lauded and extensively published in a variety of news outlets and across the Internet. These include the Naples Daily News, The Online Journal, Information Clearing House, Alternet, The Smirking Chimp, Diatribune, and the former progressive journal of thought, Wicked...

to see more of bio, click on member name

A correction

Hi Mitch,

I am well-versed in what both a republic form of government is and what democracy means. There were many reasons the founders chose a representative form of government, instead of a purely plebeian form of populous governing. However, that does not preclude, nor does it annul the sovereignty of the people or take away their autonomy and that the government obtains its powers from the permission of the people.

However, we can both agree or your byline:

“[Its] every American’s Patriotic duty to question our Govt. You don't have to respect or trust a man (woman) just because they are elected to office. Money determines who will represent a political party for each office”

As I once put it, “don’t confuse leadership with people placed in leadership positions.”

Frank J Ranelli

by Frank J. Ranelli (66 articles, 143 quicklinks, 29 diaries, 379 comments) on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 2:33:45 PM

A life long Republican who voted for George Bush.Twice.I will spend the rest of my life actively trying to atone for my greivous sins and absolute stupidity.
goldenequityA life long Republican who voted for George Bush.Twice.I will spend the rest of my life actively trying to atone for my greivous sins and absolute stupidity.

Ron Paul and Pizza

Whenever the government creates a new organization like the Department of Homeland Security or raises taxes, it interferes with your liberty. We wouldn’t make our neighbors pay for our haircut or our next meal. So why does the government do it? The answer is that the government does it because we accept the tyranny of the majority at the expense of the minority.

Think about it this way: You are with your friends and you want to order a pizza. Well, eight of your friends do. Your last two friends have been eating pizza for the last week and will absolutely not pay for your pizza. In most situations you wouldn’t force them to pay for your pizza; if you did you might not have very many friends, soon. So your two friends abstain and instead choose to go separately to a Chinese restaurant. The rest of your eight friends are divided between Papa John’s and Domino’s, most don’t really care, because they just want pizza. So you flip a coin and Domino’s it is. Six of you want pepperoni and three of you want anchovies. You could force the three to eat your pepperoni pizza, but that’s not a fair solution. Instead, you order two large pepperoni pizzas and one large anchovy pizza. Furthermore, three of you want onions and mushrooms and the other three don’t care. So you end up with one large pepperoni, one large anchovy pizza, and one large pepperoni pizza with mushrooms and onions. And Chinese take out.

Seems like a very good solution.

But what if we created a fictitious U.S. Department of Eating Out? What would the order look like? Well, they’d ask you for each individual’s social security number, look through their records, and determine that they will send you two medium anchovy pizzas for everyone in your eleven-person party. You argue with them on the phone and you tell them that most of you don’t like anchovies, but it turns out that three of your friends didn’t register with the the department of Eating Out. That’s why you are only getting two medium pizzas. And that’s why they made with anchovies. But don’t worry… Your pizzas will arrive in 40-70 minutes and they are free. That is until you look at how much the government is paying for your two pizzas: each pizza is costs 15 dollars, but the total isn’t 30 dollars. The total is 570 dollars because the government pays minimum wage and it was just raised to 13.00. The person who made your pizza dropped a bucket of tomato sauce on the floor and his friend slipped and had to be sent to the emergency room.

But who cares right? If it wasn’t for the goverment, we wouldn’t have pizzas. Everyone would have to buy their own pizza, and who would deliver it? Does anybody outside the government even know how to make a pizza? No thanks. We’ll eat our cold and tiny anchovy pizzas and pay 570 dollars for them. We are scared of the consequences of abolishing the Department of Eating Out.

As you can see, the only happy people in your party are the three anchovy aficionados. Eight of you are completely unsatisfied. This is an example where the tyranny of the “majority” affects the “minority”. Except it wasn’t the majority because the government had incomplete records and no incentive to please you.

Now apply this scenario to Health Care or the Department of Education, or Homeland Security. These organizations are inefficient and have no incentive to please you. On the other hand, Papa John’s and Domino’s Pizza make money by pleasing you. Their greed is an incentive to make your pizza better, faster and keep you coming back for more. When you were ordering the pizzas from Domino’s your friends figured out exactly how to order without government interference. Your friends who didn’t want to eat pizza got their Chinese food and were happy. Everyone else got a share of the pizza they wanted and were happy as well. And it was done through unanimous consent, not majority rule. This is the way libertarians envision an ideal society.

But if the government doesn’t make our pizza who will?

If Papa John’s and Domino’s didn’t exist, someone would learn to make it and make a living off it. The first company to sell pizzas might sell at relatively high prices. But if this is the case, someone else will take advantage of those high prices to sell pizza at lower ones. As long as the government stays out of the pizza industry, pizza will get better and cheaper. So there is no need for the government to make our pizzas. As long as there is demand for pizza, the free-market will provide it.

But what about the poor people? They can’t all afford pizza.

No. Pizza isn’t free. Someone has to make it. To give pizza away for free would be to devalue the work of Someone. When we start giving free pizza away or raise minimum wage, we trigger a domino effect that reduces the value of our currency and the value of our work. Then other people can’t afford pizza either. But it’s free right? So they don’t need to be able to afford pizza… Well, wrong. Because nothing is free. In order to make pizzas, the government has to raise taxes.

But the rich can have all the pizza they want. It’s wrong for them not to share. What have they done for us anyway?

Well, the rich create jobs. When you raise their taxes and raise minimum wage they can’t afford to hire as many people. That means next time they need to reduce spending, the might have to fire you, because maybe you are not worth the new minimum wage.

But in an ideal world everyone would have pizza.

Not everybody likes pizza. If your neighbor doesn’t like pizza why should they pay for it? Think back to the example at your party. Everyone got what they wanted and nobody paid for anything they didn’t want, through unanimous consent.

Stop being a good Democrat. Stop being a good Republican.
Start being a good American.

Do your OWN homework.

NOBODY explains Ron Paul
BETTER than Ron Paul himself!

Here is an interactive audio archive of
Ron Paul speeches and interviews as a resource in chronological
order.

www.ronpaulaudio.com

by goldenequity (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 17 comments) on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 10:33:09 AM

Don't think of an elephant

These are straight-line libertarian talking points – the “nature” is better than the “nurture” argument – and it makes you sound like a Grover Norquist devotee. If these are your political principles, then we disagree so fervently, a comment box is not the place to reply.

I would instead direct Op Ed News readers to read a short book by George Lakoff entitled, Don’t Think of an Elephant, which assiduously proves these talking points are highly errant and ineffectual for a stable and interconnected society. Then, let the readers decide and comment.

I am sorry you voted for George Bush twice, But I am glad you saw the error of your ways and readily admit your “grievous sins.” Thank you for that admission.

Frank J Ranelli

by Frank J. Ranelli (66 articles, 143 quicklinks, 29 diaries, 379 comments) on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 2:58:12 PM

Dr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.
John R MoffettDr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.

Great article Frank

By the way, have you noticed how well all that privatization has been going under the Bush administration?

I'll tell ya, Halliburton hasn't wasted a single penny of taxpayers money. Now if the damn government, you know, the army, had tried to supply the troops, all that government bureaucracy would have wasted every cent.

Hey, did you hear that, in order to beat Papa John’s prices, Dominos has been using wheat gluten from China to thicken their fake tomato sauce?

I don’t eat a lot of pizza here in the hospital, I had a stroke after taking arthritis medicine linked to increased stroke rates, which was so expensive I went broke paying for it.

I’ll tell you though, government regulation scares the hell out of me!

by John R Moffett (80 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 612 comments) on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 4:18:03 PM

Thank you.

Thanks for the kind comments. I am glad you found the article well-writtten.

America needs to wake up to these facts and act or we won't be making history; we will become history....another failed republic burried in the necropolis of history's annuls.

Frank J Ranelli

by Frank J. Ranelli (66 articles, 143 quicklinks, 29 diaries, 379 comments) on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 10:10:27 PM

Love is my religion; the world is my family.
carlLove is my religion; the world is my family.

Invaded and Occupied by Our Own Government

The vast majority of the people in the United States can now be labeled insurgents just as are most of the people in Iraq. It's just a matter of time before we will have the military going door to door in this country. Maybe then we will really begin to have empathy for Iraq and other countries that this government has invaded and imposed their will on. We are simply seeing the results of our collective consciousness.

by carl (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 125 comments) on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 9:56:56 PM

i am retired military veteran. i served over 25 years in the Unites States Army. i retired in 1983. i served in the vietnam war. a total of 27 months in that war. i also retired from Boeing aircraft. i am 68 years old. i live in texas. iwork out on my treadmill each day. i am married. i like politics. but i dont like what is going on in our government. we need a better government with politicans that answer to the people of america. after all this is our government. ( we the people) according to...

to see more of bio, click on member name
vincent passiatorei am retired military veteran. i served over 25 years in the Unites States Army. i retired in 1983. i served in the vietnam war. a total of 27 months in that war. i also retired from Boeing aircraft. i am 68 years old. i live in texas. iwork out on my treadmill each day. i am married. i like politics. but i dont like what is going on in our government. we need a better government with politicans that answer to the people of america. after all this is our government. ( we the people) according to...

to see more of bio, click on member name

talk about our government

never in all my life have i ever seen a president and politicans in congress and the senate so far out of focus with the american citizens. they can not or will not do anything for the people of this great nation. what will it take for them to listen? WE THE PEOPLE DONT MEAN ANYTHING TO ALL THE FLUNKES IN OUR GOVERNMENT.THEY TAKE IT FOR GRANTED THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT. we have a president and vice-president that are completely one sided. dont care about our Constitution that is just a dam piece of paper according to George Bush. they have there own laws, and hell with our justice system. IF THIS IS NOT A DICTATORSHIP then what is a dictator? i have said it for over 35 years, we need a new (3) third party in washington. THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM STINKS WORST THEN ALL THE SEPTIC SYSTEMS IN AMERICA. OR SHALL I SAY CESS-POOLS. i would hope that we have independents running for public office in 2008. i for one will vote all these idiots in the republican and democrat party's out. WE THE PEOPLE MUST TAKE BACK THIS COUNTRY. IT IS YOUR LAND AND IT IS MY LAND. BE ACCOUNTABLE TAKE BACK YOUR COUNTRY. IF YOU LOVE AMERICA DO IT. (NOW) ITS GETTING TO LATE. GO FOR IT.

by vincent passiatore (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 168 comments) on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 10:48:23 PM