Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (42 comments)

A surprise election outcome might be workable for moderate Democrats

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Some Democrats say Clinton’s staying in the contest could lead to a “bloody” battle that could hurt party chances to unite against McCain.

 

“Sen. Clinton pushed back hard yesterday against calls for her to withdraw…with aides saying she remains more determined that ever to remain in the contest,” said Anne Kornblut and Perry Bacon, Jr. of the Washington Post.

 

Dropping out would have worked to unite partisans under different circumstances.  If her supporters had perceived the contest to be a fair fight they could have been persuaded. The problem is it hasn’t been.  The Clinton supporters see only unfairness, prejudice and unearned backstabbing. 

 

Nothing can change what they’ve seen with their own eyes.  And some are taking it personally.  It is not too farfetched that many of them may choose to switch to McCain who, after all, was considered as a vice presidential running mate for Kerry in 2004.

 

All Clinton supporters have to do is to vote for McCain and at the same time vote for Democratic senators and representatives to achieve what they want.  And that’s someone who talks straighter than Obama and a filibuster-proof, progressive Congress that will force moderate Supreme Court nominations.  Moderates like Sandra Day O’Connor would suit the bill.

 

That might be accidentally the most workable solution since there is a suspicion amongst Clinton supporters that big, behind-the-scene handlers back Obama because they think they can control him but can’t control Clinton -- by a long shot.

 

It wouldn’t take all the Clinton supporters to swing enough winning votes to McCain; just a little over 8% of them could cinch it by a 1% to 3% margin.

 

That’s what might be the most workable solution – even the fairest -- because moderates are a desirable group to call on to lead the way to compromise and a government that could hum with purpose and success.   Not just wishful talk about unity and togetherness, but the compromises and results that used to be the norm in this country’s business before the “me” generation and global ambitions began to call too many of the shots.

 

We don’t need more extreme liberals like Sen. Obama or extreme conservatives like Jim DeMint of S. Carolina. 

 

We need more to join moderates like Justice O’Connor and others, such as Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine.

 

It’s the surprise outcome of the election that might become workable for the long-term good.

 

www.politicalposts.com

concerned citizen and editor of politicalposts.com

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
42 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Moronic and Proof of Hillary's Right Wing Support by Rob Kall on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 5:29:40 AM
Gravel by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:01:14 AM
Our esteemed host wrote: by Dana Pico on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:10:05 PM
There's a reason by Crystal Purcell on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:25:10 PM
Edith has it backwards by John R Moffett on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:25:26 AM
Yes!!! by Karen Boyette on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:30:40 AM
You fell into the pundits trap by Kenneth Barr on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:07:21 AM
Bravo! by Karen Boyette on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:19:10 AM
I support Hillary Clinton by Merylr on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:43:25 AM
Demopublicans by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:55:16 AM
Say What? by Lover of Truth on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:25:35 PM
What difference? by Darren Wolfe on Tuesday, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:47:20 AM
Clinton's Delusional Sniper Dodging at Tuzla Reveals Much! by Mike Shelby on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:40:46 AM
Then be gone! by John Sanchez Jr. on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:55:57 AM
It is getting more cloudy every day by Steve Hanken on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:06:16 AM
The fallacy of the false dilemma – Door number three please by edith fletcher on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:34:27 AM
Crazy is as crazy does! by Mike Shelby on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:04:43 AM
You know, when our esteemed host published this article . . by Dana Pico on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:56:28 PM
Holding your nose by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:17:15 AM
View from a foreigner by baaraan on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:37:41 AM
Clinton or McCain. by douglas kay on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:16:19 AM
Douglas..... by Michael Shaw on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:26:18 PM
There really is no difference between the two... by paz love on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:57:04 PM
Hillary Clinton (R-NY) by Mikael Rudolph on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:47:54 AM
Obama's right wing support. by jackie feulner on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:04:34 PM
Well Jackie in my view, by Michael Shaw on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:10:19 PM
Keep in Mind Hillary didn't write that piece of nonsense. by Crystal Purcell on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:10:07 PM
Wasted vote. by John Haigh on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:18:26 PM
Passionate by Mad Jayhawk on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:21:04 PM
A revelation! by michal54 on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:42:02 PM
are libertarians against progress? by GeoRip on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:24:49 PM
Libertarian Progress by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:54:27 PM
Foreign Interest by Mad Jayhawk on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:27:06 PM
Edith, Edith, Edith by GeoRip on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:38:56 PM
McCain was "moderate" right before he wasn't by shirley reese on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:01:34 PM
What cracks me up by Michael Shaw on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:42:26 PM
Was there another Justice O'Connor? by Dana Pico on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:02:52 PM
correction on my earlier post by shirley reese on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 3:27:53 PM
Additional thoughts about Edith's proposition by Crystal Purcell on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:12:53 PM
Oh yes they would! by Dana Pico on Monday, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:47:14 AM
Freedom of choice. by douglas kay on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:20:52 PM
HERE WE GO AGAIN by RICHARD SHADE on Monday, Mar 31, 2008 at 2:07:49 AM