Tags for This Article:

Bush Admin (1980)  Bush Admin (811)  Cheney Dick (718)  Dollar (688)  Bush George Herbert Walker (77)  Bushisms (52) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
January 22, 2008 at 11:51:41

Sorry, it's NOT just Bush & Cheney. Not by a long vote.

by Ed Tubbs     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Sorry, it’s not JUST Bush & Cheney, not by a long vote.

 

All three of the major Democratic presidential contenders are excoriating the Bush/Cheney cabal for the quite dire and very real and wholly extant distress facing the United States today. However they are not 100% wrong to do so, they are missing the sinking ship by the lengths of several lifeboats.

 

To morph on a phrase, “It’s the economy stupid,” this time it has got to be “It’s the GOP stupid.” It has got to be because accuracy demands as much, and whatever remedies may be possible will only be possible via a Democratic senate that can actually get them passed. That means, the Dems have to have a filibuster-proof 60+ majority. Anything less, and whether it’s healthcare reform or fiscal reform or Iraq or whatever will fall dead as senate Republicans lock arms as they sing praises to Ronald Reagan.

 

I admire John McCain for all he’s given to our country. But John McCain has loudly and as often as every opportunity presents itself proclaimed his membership as a foot soldier in the Reagan revolution.

 

What we have before us today, as the markets commence an avalanche like crash, is the direct result of what Bush 41 correctly labeled the voodoo economics of deregulate everything, monitor nothing, privatize profit, socialize risk, slash taxes and borrow, borrow, borrow like you had no intention of paying any of it back.

 

And here’s how it all works, or, more accurately, never really could. Let’s borrow some of Marvelous George’s screwed dicta and put the shoe on the other horse. You’re a lender. Someone comes to you and wants to borrow some money, say a couple hundred billion or so. Who’s counting, once the numbers get so high the most fertile imagination cannot imagine it? Ala Stalin, a few deaths are a tragedy, a few million are a statistic; same thing with money. Except for the payback end of the deal.

 

Now, your loan terms stipulate a certain interest rate, discounted and with the securities tradable on the world’s market. The first consideration is straight from Finance 101: money has a time value — the greater the length of time before you can use it, the lower its value becomes. One hundred dollars today is worth one heck of a lot more than $100 ten years from now. Even forgetting the fact of inflation, which we cannot, foregoing purchase and investment opportunities for ten years wrings value from the sum.

 

The next consideration derives from the question of relative value; what that buckaroo is wroth against other currencies. If the prospective value of the buckaroo, say against the Euro, is unreliable and/or headed south, you’re going to demand a lot more cushion when you lend it; conversely, the greenback will be worth less — not necessarily worthless (let’s get our punctuation straight), but worth less, and less, and less, and less.

 

With a dollar losing value, what those holding lots of it have to ponder is the diminishing array of exchanges they can make with it. And so the downward spiral begins its inapposite trajectory.

 

And the whole thing got its less than royal birth with RR. Dick Cheney even said so. He also said a lot of other things, much to an entire world’s regret. Thing is, however not a one of the Republicans sitting in the House or the Senate, or any of those running for office, uttered the first whisper of disagreement. True. True, John McCain complained about “pork” and “ear marks,” and he did vote against the not offset tax cuts. What the long-tenured senator did not do was to demand a hearing into any of it. Furthermore, what he did do, in the 2004 campaign, was to wrap his arms around Goofy George, as if they were long lost, separated-at-birth twins.

 

Saying now everything was the fault of Bush and Cheney is at once wholly inaccurate, and extraordinarily dangerous. It lets all those who went along for the ride off the hook, to wax once again a W mixed metaphor. NO! NO! NO! Don’t do it. At least never forget a Bush 41 aphorism: “Wouldn’t be prudent.”

 — Ed Tubbs       

 

An "Old Army Vet" and liberal, qua liberal, with a passion for open inquiry in a neverending quest for truth unpoisoned by religious superstitions. Per Voltaire: "He who can lead you to believe an absurdity can lead you to commit an atrocity."

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Obama Must Appoint a Consumer Protectionist as FDA Commissioner by Stephen Fox

Naomi Wolf Must Watch Video: A Coup Took Place on October 1, 2008 by youtube

BARACK OBAMA On Gandhi's Birthday by Stephen Fox

CBS's Spoiled Poodle Dean Reynolds Bites Obama-- Reports his Plane Smells by Rob Kall

What I Learned At The Sarah Palin Rally Before They Threw Me Out! by Linda Milazzo

The dangerous McCain/Palin character assassination of Obama by Sherman Yellen

Return of the Jedi by Ferdinand

How low can Palin go? by Deb Della Piana

Onward, Christian Soldiers (Redux) by Shirley Bianchi

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

Go To Top 50 Most Popular