OpEdNews Op Eds

Double Standards at the New York Times

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (69 fans)
- Advertisement -

By Dave Lindorff

The New York Times, which claims to draw a clear distinction between its news articles and its commentary articles, dropped any pretense of such a distinction in its minimalist "coverage" of yesterday's dramatic effort by Rep. Dennis Kucinich to force the House to consider the impeachment of Vice President Dick Cheney.

In a small 230-word piece on Kucinich's privilege motion, and the subsequent vote to send his H Res. 333, now called H. Res. 799, to the House Judiciary Committee, after it has been consigned to limbo for over 6 months by the House leadership, the Times succeeded in dissing both Kucinich and the notion of impeaching the vice president.

As the anonymous Times reporter wrote in the lead of this hit piece:

It is hard to know which effort has longer odds, the bid by Representative Dennis J. Kucinich, Democrat of Ohio, to become president of the United State, or his bid to unseat Vice President Dick Cheney by impeaching him.

The rest of the article, which made no attempt to lay out Kucinich's blistering expose of the vice president's criminal role in presenting false evidence to the Congress and American people to justify an invasion of Iraq, and his condemnation of the vice president for the international crime of threatening war against Iran, is spent describing how House Democratic leaders and Republicans sparred over Kucinich's bill, with Republicans helping to defeat a Democratic effort to table it, and with Democrats then pushing it off the floor and over to the Judiciary Committee.

The Times has clearly decided that despite its editorial positions blasting the criminal actions and blatant abuses of power of this administration, there should be no impeachment hearings on either Bush or Cheney. That might be okay as an editorial position, but the nation's leading newspaper, at least by reputation, has also decided it will buttress that position by either ignoring the growing nationwide impeachment movement, which it has been doing now for two years, or by using its news pages to undermine and ridicule impeachment efforts. That is not okay for a publication that hypocritically pretends that its news articles are fair and balanced.

Instead of assigning a team of crack reporters to investigate the vice president's ongoing crimes--for example his recent effort to drag the US into a war with Iran by going behind the State Department and pressing Israel to attack Iran, so that Iran would retaliate and the U.S. would be forced to come to Israel's aid (a treasonous act by Cheney that was reported in Newsweek magazine)--or the president's crimes (such as his role in obstructing the investigation of the Valerie Plame outiing, or his direct role in authorizing severe torture of captives), the Times is using its reportorial resources to squelch a mass movement for impeachment.

- Advertisement -

The paper is also joining the rest of the corporate media in yet another shameless effort to deny the American people a genuine political campaign of ideas, deciding well ahead of the primaries which candidates are worthy of coverage, and which ideas and issues are acceptable for public debate. Kucinich, who has been the most consistent and principled opponent of the Iraq War and the drive to attack Iran, the most knowledgeable and consistent proponent of genuine health care reform, the most solid defender of the Constitution and the most ardent defender of working Americans and of the poor among the list of Democratic candidates, is simply not covered by the Times, and is now written off in a suppposed news article as being unelectable!

What a pathetic display of bias, and what an insult to readers.

At least it helps me to understand why the paper has never reviewed Barbara Olshansky's and my book on "The Case for Impeachment," or in fact any of the excellent books on that topic that have been published over the past two years.

Impeachment, for the Times, is a non-story, suitable apparently only for sophomoric ridicule.

________________________

- Advertisement -

DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. His latest book, co-authored by Barbara Olshansky, is "The Case for Impeachment" (St. Martin's Press, 2006 and now available in paperback). His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net

 

Dave Lindorff is a founding member of the collectively-owned, journalist-run online newspaper www.thiscantbehappening.net. He is a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This Can't Be Happening! Resisting the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel's Gaza Atrocities Recall America's Atrocities in Vietnam

The Case for Impeachment of President Barack Obama

Barack Obama: Manchurian Candidate Version 2.0

Free John Walker Lindh, Bush's and Cheney's First Torture Victim!

What Nobody's Saying: The Bailout Will Kill the Dollar

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2007/11/7/114657/... by Jay Lovestone on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 11:37:07 AM
http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2007/11/7/114657/... by Jay Lovestone on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 11:38:12 AM
Links to links that lead to links.You got somethin... by Jim Freeman on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 11:57:01 AM
If a meeting is called on the Iraq War and 9-11 at... by Dave Lindorff on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 1:21:59 PM
Herman in Manufacturing Consent, & many other ... by Richard Mynick on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 12:25:16 PM
Lindorff is a piss poor journalist. What leftist w... by Jay Lovestone on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 12:49:22 PM
and Herman, Khmer Rouge apologists, http://www.es... by Jay Lovestone on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 12:52:57 PM
"Propaganda Model" dissected, in the spe... by Jay Lovestone on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 12:55:58 PM
http://www.paulbogdanor.com/chomskyhoax.html... by Jay Lovestone on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 12:56:49 PM
 http://oliverkamm.typepad.com/blog/2005/01/c... by Jay Lovestone on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 12:58:45 PM
Got any more links? When you're done, let me k... by Kevin Gosztola on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 1:01:16 PM
Well of course it's nothing new, but is it not... by Judy Ramsey on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 1:09:56 PM
You know, there’s actually an ironic truth t... by Alan MacDonald on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 3:07:27 PM
Heh, thin skinned are we? http://www.chomskysdo... by Jay Lovestone on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 7:26:48 PM
I think the departing McKinney's Art... by Mr M on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 9:04:27 PM
I have read criticisms of the media of the years s... by Andris on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 11:33:32 PM
quite appropriately  made a comment about a p... by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Nov 8, 2007 at 8:55:36 AM
Well said, Mark.I'm getting a bit tired of the... by C.Bid on Thursday, Nov 8, 2007 at 10:09:56 AM