Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
February 5, 2007 at 09:23:50

View Ratings | Rate It

Eh? Ran what?

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Daniel Geery (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Daniel Geery - Writer

I pointed out in a comment to another article what all Christians, and every other person who professes to believe in the fundamentals of their religion, supposedly believes: Thou shalt not kill. Four little words that seem fairly self-explanatory.

Yet throughout history you can find untold millions of folks, if not billions, who changed horses and ran away from this concept at full gallop for various reasons: "To defend their homeland," "To serve their country," "To get an education," "To see the world," "To defend their religion" (!), etc., etc., etc. So I herein provide a refresher course, which I wrote with the intention of provoking thought, particularly in young men and women who might be contemplating these notions-and to anyone out there who is a cheerleader for "our armed services," which of course means most Americans.

Warning: If you have blood pressure problems, it might be wise to stop here and go read another article.


If you join the armed services, what are you if not a murderer for hire? How can there be "good men and women" in the armed forces? Do good men and women really offer to kill for others? I really can't see it.

How many people did Hitler kill? One, that we can be reasonably certain of, since it is general knowledge that he committed suicide. As for millions of other deaths generally attributed to him, as in, "Hitler killed six to ten million Jews," it robs so many others of proper credit and is thus unfair, since Hitler did not kill those millions--other people did it for him. In the same vein, George Bush did not kill anyone, nor did Osama bin Ladin, as far as I know. They have others do the killing for them.

If you are willing to kill another human being, what business have you on this planet? If you want to kill someone, I say kill yourself. I won't even get into the opportunities lost, because we squander over half our taxes on the military (which, incidentally, can't catch a cave man after how many years now?).

I do not support our troops. I support our conscientious objectors, and other thinking people. I support nurses, doctors, teachers, construction workers, garbage men, laborers, cooks, waiters and waitresses, writers, inventors, organic farmers, architects, scientists, engineers, computer programmers, landscapers, and all those who choose to actually do something with their lives. To the destroyers I say: Why don't you get a life?

Far better to be a prostitute, even, than to be a military person. You are at least hiring out to bring pleasure to others, not misery and destruction.

If you can't bring yourself to kill yourself, and you still feel a vague need to kill someone, at least get to know a great many people first. Then pick the one you like the least. It will probably be a Republican. Then you may have some real personal reason to kill, rather than doing so because some wacko politician wants others killed, but can't seem to do it him or herself.

'Nuf said. I bring you now to an article in the news today:

... [Ehren] Watada himself did what he believed he had to do seven months ago when he became the first -- and only -- commissioned officer in the United States publicly to refuse deployment to Iraq.

His conscience, he said, had overtaken him. He told the world what he had privately told his superiors months earlier: that he believed the war was illegal and immoral, and he would play no role in it.

Watada tried to resign; the Army denied him. He said he was willing to fight in Afghanistan; the Army refused him again: A soldier cannot pick and choose where he fights. As his unit shipped off to Iraq, Watada stayed to face the consequences.


Ehren Watada, I have no doubt, joined the Army in good faith--as I well realize most people do, in spite of the food for thought I passed out above-but when Ehren saw the light his conscience provided, he followed that light, and became a conscientious objector, at least according to his own inner light.

You may now say, "Yes, but he's still willing to kill, just in a different place." One point for you. But Ehren is still following the light of his own conscience, after carefully evaluating the situation in Iraq, and he is not blindly following a mandate he no longer believes in. I applaud him for that, especially given the enormous personal sacrifice he is making.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.hyperblimp.com

Geery lived off the grid for 15 years in an earth-sheltered, solar heated home, while his kids learned in school that solar energy isn't feasible. NAPTA hosts a page on Geery's foibles in (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Christianity Iraq"
Christianity in Iraq
by Suha Rassam

$19.95
Lowest New Price $18.57

Number of pages: 260
Publisher: Gracewing Publishing

A Quiet Reality: A Chaplain's Journey Into Babylon, Iraq with the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force
by Emilio Marrero Jr.

$15.99
Lowest New Price $14.99

Number of pages: 264
Publisher: Faithwalk Publishing

The Christian Heritage of Iraq: Collected papers from the Christianity of Iraq I-V Seminar Days
by Erica C. D. Hunter et. al.

$107.00

Number of pages: 328
Publisher: Gorgias Press, Llc

Meditations from Iraq: A Chaplain's Ministry in the Middle East 2003-2004
by Lance Kittleson

$20.95
Lowest New Price $18.34

Number of pages: 237
Publisher: CSS Publishing Company

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
19 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Support the honest by Mark Sashine on Monday, Feb 5, 2007 at 10:25:02 AM
Well OK by Timothy V. Gatto on Monday, Feb 5, 2007 at 10:56:46 AM
Flawed Logic by Ed Wood on Monday, Feb 5, 2007 at 11:12:23 AM
To both Tim Gatto and ed_woods2 by Mark Sashine on Monday, Feb 5, 2007 at 1:27:57 PM
OK, I'll Answer by Timothy V. Gatto on Monday, Feb 5, 2007 at 2:20:45 PM
I surely believe you, thanks by Mark Sashine on Monday, Feb 5, 2007 at 2:44:07 PM
Reckless by Ed Wood on Monday, Feb 5, 2007 at 6:07:32 PM
foolish thinking by Mitch LaRoche on Monday, Feb 5, 2007 at 4:21:24 PM
Morality by JSwanson on Monday, Feb 5, 2007 at 5:35:05 PM
Some Clarification by Jonah2015 on Monday, Feb 5, 2007 at 6:30:16 PM
Re: Some Clarification by JSwanson on Monday, Feb 5, 2007 at 8:57:16 PM
Dan Geerey is basically correct. by jpsmith123 on Monday, Feb 5, 2007 at 7:16:03 PM
Could you Explain Yourself? by Timothy V. Gatto on Monday, Feb 5, 2007 at 9:17:37 PM
It's a very simple concept really. by jpsmith123 on Monday, Feb 5, 2007 at 10:08:05 PM
1812!!? by Ed Wood on Tuesday, Feb 6, 2007 at 2:05:25 AM
You have a better example? by jpsmith123 on Tuesday, Feb 6, 2007 at 5:13:17 PM
" Just war "................. by larry booth on Tuesday, Feb 6, 2007 at 9:49:48 PM
Read the book "Day of Deceit", and then get back to me. by jpsmith123 on Wednesday, Feb 7, 2007 at 4:31:18 PM
My last word here by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Feb 6, 2007 at 8:35:07 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum