Tags for This Article:

Corruption (1760) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s):
Add to My Group
October 29, 2007 at 13:14:56

WILL AMERICAN EMPIRE BUILDING COST US OUR FREEDOM?

by Cliff Carson     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

WILL AMERICAN EMPIRE BUILDING COST US OUR FREEDOM? 

Note to my Children and Grandchildren and Mankind: “You are the sum of all that has ever been, and therefore the promise of all that will ever be.  Live your life fully, morally, and for those who inherit what you leave” 

By Cliff Carson

 

Our current Foreign Policy is an agenda driven by Neo-conservatism supported by Corporate business interests and religious Elitism.  The mission of this policy is to create a permanent global crisis as a justification for Interventionism.  The intended result of the intervention would be to create a “ perpetual enemy” and a need to protect American interests worldwide.   To pull this off our Government must become corrupted both legally and ethically and would need to submit to the Neo-conservative, Corporate, and Elitist consortium, instead of the will of the people.  Such an event can only be realized by convincing the people that their safety and freedom depends on their Government having sufficient power and freedom from the Rule of Law, so that they can “protect us from our enemies”.   And finally the people would have to accept a Government claim that the only way to repulse our enemies is to give Government tight control over every thing we do, say, write, and yes, think.

 

Even the dimmest of us would realize that to accomplish all the above would require that we all be dimmed down.  But we are a bright people – right?  None of the above would ever happen, not in America - right? And as a final proof, if any of the above were happening we bright ones would recognize it.  Or I guess we would, maybe, you think?

 

This corrupted Government’s policy is predicated on the right to intervene everywhere in the world, or in our homes, in whatever forms it might choose, because the Neo-Cons and their two most steadfast enablers, the Religious Right and International Corporations all have interests that are common and global.  This is the Neo-Con utopia in a nutshell.  Further this philosophy is based on a policy of “elitism” (only we have the intellect to govern), the Neo-Con’s view is that they are destiny’s elite and the Religious Right believe that their religion is the salvation of mankind and if you look around and pay attention you will see that International Business has the policy to put the common person in a type of economic slavery.  Finally you will find support of this philosophy everywhere in our two ruling parties.  But of course it could never happen here.

 

Boil all this down and our Foreign Policy becomes “By Gods dispensation, we have Divine Right and any who disagree are therefore enemies of God, be they Individual or State. And with God on our side how can we lose?  Enemies of God are to be eradicated or subjugated”.  Doing some reading in history I stumbled across the Hitler rationale for the Governance of Germany under his leadership-Would you believe it, the above is a picture of his rationale for Germany’s future.  The Third Reich- (Empire) was to endure for 1,000 years.   Did the German people buy in?  Bet your bankroll they did, that is until after they had given up their rights and rule of law to Hitler, one day they woke up and realized they were the enemies of the Third Reich.  Then it was to late.  Isn’t history interesting and informative!

 

The question is – Will American Empire Building Cause us our Freedom?  Should we ask the German people?  Those who lived under Communism?  Should we inquire of history?   Or are we consigned to repeat history?

 How did we come to this? This didn’t just start when Bush came into office.  No, this erosion of the Rule of Law and the Warmongering really began to gain momentum after World War II.  But the change from a freedom loving and moral Government to what we have today, an arrogant and selfish elitist Government bent on World domination began so incrementally that those living at that time of change, the tipping point, as Naomi Wolf might describe it, really had to be paying close attention to see it, or even recognize it.  But once a tipping point has occurred, the new trend can gain momentum swiftly. After the Great World War, affluence for the common American citizen was real.  We never had it so good.  Business was booming.  Flush with money and the seizure of the American Dream this society of ours had the future nailed, if we could just weed out the criminal element that was sure to try and profit illicitly from the good times.  This element always follows the money.  They have been with mankind since we stood up to become modern day man.  There have always been those who forcefully “take” from the weaker and there always will be.  What we have to do is be vigilant of their presence and stop them once we see the telltale signs of corruption and despotism beginning to form.  If we don’t, some day we may wake up like the Germans and find that we have become the enemy.

 

The Neo-Cons are a collection of very special elitists and corporate interests – and they have taken over our government to the extent that they are able to dictate the governance of our society.  To question the Neo-Con dictates has become heresy.  This allows them to operate with impunity outside our Rule of Law.

 Put simply we are becoming a Corporatocracy – a merged word meaning rule of and by the Corporations and elitists.  The Corporations, run by Elitists, Neo-Cons, and enabled by the Religious Right, have corrupted our Government.  Their policy is for the interests of themselves and the Corporation bottom line.  And now these Corporations are into building PCA’s, Private Corporation Armies.  Recently we have come to realize that they are now in our everyday lives, but Mercenaries have been around as long as humanity.   The First American Mercenary Corporation, DynCorp, was formed in 1946.  They are currently making money in Iraq and many other places around the world.  They don’t work for our Defense Department; meaning they don’t have to obey rules of the Geneva Convention, instead they work for the State Department (currently spell that Bush).  There is profit in supplying the materials or war, and soldiers are an essential ingredient of any war machine.  For the Corporations, War and disorder yields a perfect breeding ground for them to build wealth, power, and influence.  These potential rewards encourage the Elites, the Militant Corporations, and the corrupted Government to co-join to impose their rule, outside our Rule of Law, and their rule has no incentive for a peaceful Earth.   This Shadow Government, run by the Neo-Cons (think the management section of the Elite), has as its ultimate aim, to rule the world for its own sustenance.  Each of this unholy Trinity- the Corporations, The Neo-Cons, and the Religious Right, has its own reason for alliance.  The Corporations seek the profit a monopoly can bring, the Neo-Cons look to an Absolute Power monopoly as the means to continue their dominance, and the Religious Right believe they have the Divine blessing of monopoly to force on unbelievers God’s work, at their interpretation, anointing themselves as the chosen and rightful wrathful arm of God, with a duty to smite the unbelievers.  In essence they are trying to hurry Armageddon. Like Identity Thieves they have stolen what the majority of we Americans stand for: Moral Principle.  And once it was stolen, it gets more difficult to replace because each day the consortium grows stronger.  And Moral Principle is Anathema to them. The remedy is simple.  We must take back what our fathers left us.  And we must guard it vigilantly so that what we leave for our future is strengthened by our stewardship.  Join those of us who stand on Moral Principle.  Correct the aberration we have residing in Washington.  We cannot afford to lose our freedoms to build empires.

 

http://www.populistamerica.com/cliff_carson

Cliff Carson Cliff Carson is a retired Quality Engineering/Management Professional living in Arkansas. He is an MS Operations Management Graduate of the University of Arkansas and is a Senior Member of The American Society for Quality. He and his wife are taking it easy and enjoy visits by their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments

Brett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.
Brett PaatschBrett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.

Will it? It has! Displease the President at your risk.

The question is – Will American Empire Building Cost us our Freedom?  Should we ask the German people?  Those who lived under Communism?  Should we inquire of history?   Or are we consigned to repeat history?

Its not necessary and arguably it is too late to ask IF empire building will cost Americans their freedom - during the time of President George W Bush it ("the war on terror") already has. 

Americans UNCONSTITUTIONALLY lost arguably their most basic freedom, the "priviledge" (the right) of the writ of habeus corpus that was so important it was not in the amendments that make up the Bill of Rights but further forward in article 1 section 9 of the Constitution itself.

That section specified that "the priviledge of the writ of habeus corpus shall not be suspended unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it."

The United States Congress already HAS given up your priviledge of that writ in the Military Commissions Act of 2006.  And they did it despite that there was no rebellion or invasion. Or was there a rebellion or an invasion that wasn't reported in 2006? 

If memory serves Arlen Spectre (a Republican) made essentially this point (no rebellion, no invasion so how can we suspend habeus corpus?) in the debates about the Military Commissions Bill before it became the Act.

Effectively that right is gone now unless the federal courts wants to give it back.  And without habeas corpus you might find it hard to get the attention of the federal courts as habeus corpus is the right to be presented before a court.  

You may remain free though whilst you don't displease the President or his successor. Of course the President or his successors displeasure may not be personally assessing you, he or she might rather vest the duty of your oversight in officers and subordinates deputised to act on his (or her) behalf. 

Do I exaggerate? Am I (as a foreigner) wrong or mistaken? Do you know?

by Brett Paatsch (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 22 diaries, 1010 comments) on Monday, October 29, 2007 at 9:28:47 PM
 


Cliff Carson
Cliff Carson is a retired Quality Engineering/Management Professional living in Arkansas. He is an MS Operations Management Graduate of the University of Arkansas and is a Senior Member of The American Society for Quality. He and his wife are taking it easy and enjoy visits by their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren.

Cliff CarsonCliff Carson
Cliff Carson is a retired Quality Engineering/Management Professional living in Arkansas. He is an MS Operations Management Graduate of the University of Arkansas and is a Senior Member of The American Society for Quality. He and his wife are taking it easy and enjoy visits by their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren.

Response to Brett's comment

Brett

Yes the loss of freedoms began quite awhile ago.  And it has continued thru both Republican and Democrat majorities and Presidents.  But it has really grown exponentialy under the Bush regime.  It is not too late to regain our country, but do enough citizens yet recognize that we have to get started now.  We need to replace every incumbent, for me preferrably with an Independent.

 

Cliff Carson

 

 

by Cliff Carson (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 21 comments) on Monday, October 29, 2007 at 11:06:47 PM
 


Brett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.
Brett PaatschBrett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.

Cliff there isn't time to replace EVERY incumbent with

an independent.

There isn't time because you'd have to change too much else  in order to make independents rather than party members well known enough to the constitents of all the electorates to be elected. 

Realistically it is going to be an exceptional independent that can beat a candidate that runs with the support of a party organisation - its not going to become the norm anytime soon. Anytime soon enough to make it the core of one's strategy.

Realistically some independents can be elected but another approach is going to be needed in order to stop freedoms being lost when majorities will be needed in the House and/or the Senate and/or the Presidency as a result of the "war on terror". 

Realistically it would be easier (but still very very difficult) to get an independent (of the Democrats and Republicans) President than either a majority of independs in the House or the Senate.  Do you disagree?

I think strategies have to be explored that have some chance of working in a reasonable timeframe. I think that the "war on terror" (or the building of an American empire using the "war on terror" as a front) will produce from foreigners a political response that is characterisable as terrorism.  So the war on terror notion needs to be recognized as the absurd thing that it is. The war on terror creates terrorism because it puts some foreigners in the position of being outlaws with nothing to lose.

I think Cliff that the arguments for change have to be taken to all Americans including those that are Democrats and Republicans traditionally. I think we have to find the patience to talk with Democrats and Republicans in the interest of a greater common good.  That might seem hard but it is not so hard I think as getting all incumbents replaced by independents before the United States ceases to exist forever as it exists currently in the Constitution that all senators and representatives of all parties swear oaths of take affirmations to support and defend.

I think Chris we have to find ways to make enough of them do what they have promised to do.  i.e. To support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.    To support it and defend it above party and above other lesser policy objectives when it is in jeopardy. 

I think Chris we have to be able to show that the Constitution is in jeopardy. That citizens of the United States of America are being disenfranchised from their rights under the Constitution. That the system of government that the Constitution prescribes with its separation of powers as assurances to the people is in danger of passing away through the establishment of so far unrepudiated precedents established by the Bush administration post 9-11.  

Do you disagree Chris?

by Brett Paatsch (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 22 diaries, 1010 comments) on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 at 4:43:24 AM
 


Cliff Carson
Cliff Carson is a retired Quality Engineering/Management Professional living in Arkansas. He is an MS Operations Management Graduate of the University of Arkansas and is a Senior Member of The American Society for Quality. He and his wife are taking it easy and enjoy visits by their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren.

Cliff CarsonCliff Carson
Cliff Carson is a retired Quality Engineering/Management Professional living in Arkansas. He is an MS Operations Management Graduate of the University of Arkansas and is a Senior Member of The American Society for Quality. He and his wife are taking it easy and enjoy visits by their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren.

Response to Brett's comment

Brett

I absolutely agree with you.  The best scenario is that those we elect exhibit the morality and fidelity inherently intended by the framers of our constitution.  But what I have seen especially since the ascension of the Bush Administration is a complete abdication of those values by the elected.  I recall my loathing for the Clinton Administrations “Party First” example.  And then we have the Bush Bunch doing the same.

 It is as if there is a complete disregard for the rights of the public where our current Government is concerned.  I recently had posted a commentary “Guaranteed Redress, A Bedrock Foundation for Democracy” , you can review it at http://www.populistamerica.com/cliff_carson along with other things I have written on this condition in America. My rationale for booting all incumbents is that this should be their reward for failure to properly execute their charge.  The intention is to send a message to anyone elected that they were elected for the sole purpose of representing those who elected them, and for that reason only. Finally if we can get an Independent Executive (that should be our #1 Goal) we are one third of the way there.  And as I have said in other conversations with concerned citizens, we only need to get enough congressmen and women elected to give a majority to one side or the other in future initiatives.  I feel that if we can elect even twenty Independents to the House and about eight to the senate, the power of their swing votes will be enough to force the other two parties to work together with those Independents for the good of America. Changing the face of American Governance will only START with election 08.  But once our citizens get a good whiff of reclaimed freedom, I think the movement will gain momentum thru future elections until one day we will realize that we have taken back America.   The key from my perspective is to start now because the public is ready and will build on our 08 success. Really appreciate your thoughtful comments and ideas.  It is thru people like you that success will come.  We will get our country back. Cliff Carson 

   

 

by Cliff Carson (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 21 comments) on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 at 6:00:26 AM
 

 

4 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Obama Must Appoint a Consumer Protectionist as FDA Commissioner by Stephen Fox

BARACK OBAMA On Gandhi's Birthday by Stephen Fox

Naomi Wolf Must Watch Video: A Coup Took Place on October 1, 2008 by youtube

The dangerous McCain/Palin character assassination of Obama by Sherman Yellen

PECK, PECK. . .SQUAWK! by Rip Rense

Sarah Palin; Secessionist-- powerful new Youtube Video by youtube

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

A Solution? by Paul Craig Roberts

What I Learned At The Sarah Palin Rally Before They Threw Me Out! by Linda Milazzo

Palin Guilty - Troopergate Witnesses & McCain Campaign Obstructed Justice by Steven Leser

Go To Top 50 Most Popular