Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (8 comments)

Job Loss for February Much Higher than 63,000

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

This one particularly got my ire:

Front Page: 25,000 jobs expected to be created in February

Back section: 63,000 jobs lost in February.

63,000 jobs lost brought the Dow Jones down to the 11,800 level. What would it have been had they seen the real numbers. As bad as this is, and it is what is reported throughout the media, it is not the 'real' number.

I worked for a State government for a while as a researcher/planner.  One of my areas was in workforce retention so I spent a good deal of time watching the income and outgo of employees in various categories.

Now, my math is pretty good, though admittedly simple. That is to say that I squeezed somehow through statistics in my undergraduate degree and was thrilled that it wasn't necessary for my Masters. I can count without using my fingers and toes but don't really understand high-level statistical schmoozing and machinations.

So, when I would see that 60% of a certain position tended, year after year, to leave their employment after less than 6 months, I would write a report to the powers that be. In my simplistic mind, patterns are patterns and percentages are percentages. By the time the reports were 'fine-tuned' by the powers that be, all problems disappeared and life was good. I expect it wasn't so good for those folks who left a decent paying State job for unknown reasons and I still can't believe it was good for the various departments who depended on those workers.

Like I said, I'm educated but basically simple. If we really didn't need those employees, why continue hiring them and losing them year after year?  If we really did need that job class, why didn't we find out why they left and try to change things? I left there eventually – it wasn't worth the cognitive dissonance. 

Now I am far removed from that environment but occasionally some numbers come across my computer search that just don't make sense and I foolishly look further into them. Such it was on Friday, March 7th with the federal Jobs Report that tanked the Dow Jones: 63,000 jobs lost in the Economy! Dow heads down into the 11,000's!

What kind of jobs were lost, I wondered? As the initial report was on the internet, I decided to take a gander at it. Big Mistake! Déjà vu – I was mentally back in my old, discarded job.

Here are the numbers that they report.  You can go there yourself and check it out at page 2 & 3 of http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm 

Jobs Lost, February 2008

Manufacturing                  -52,000

Construction                     -39,000

Retail Trade                      -34,000

Wholesale Trade               -9,000

Temp Empl Svcs               -28,000

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Christopher is a retired Mayflower family, Navy Vet, flower child, Mensan and a long-time rural Alaskan with a lifetime or two in Social Sciences and cross-cultural endeavors. He has a terminal graduate degree and is heading into his terminal years (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Government reports can be hard to read by Grady Cash on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:39:18 AM
Yep by Christopher Wright on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 9:05:49 AM
The phantom birth-death formula added 135,000 jobs, too by gordon nelson on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:16:20 PM
Ah-ha! by Christopher Wright on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:42:24 PM
Elaine Chao by victorberry on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 5:39:23 PM
how many Bush operatives @ BLS? by gordon nelson on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:28:16 PM
Gordon by Mike Folkerth on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 11:11:07 PM
jobless and uncounted by Kevin Anthony Stoda on Sunday, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:28:21 PM