![]() |
|
|
October 8, 2007 at 08:33:09
by Cenk Uygur Page 1 of 3 page(s) |
|
|
I've met and interviewed Brian Williams. He's a lovely guy. Personable, funnier than expected and smart. He is also irrelevant. There's nothing wrong with Brian Williams. He is a smooth, professional news anchor. He's not offensive, biased or fake. He plays it straight - and that's his problem. It's not him. It's us. We're not interested in someone regurgitating the news to us and taking a half hour to do it. We don't need a professional news anchor to tell us what the news is. This isn't 1955. I've got all the news in the world at my fingertips, what do I need this guy to tell me what he thinks is important? Who cares what Brian Williams thinks is important? In the old days, you needed these authority figures to sort out the news for you and tell you what was important and weed out the riff-raff. But these aren't the old days. I have a mind of my own. I don't need to borrow a news anchor's. And if I were to borrow one, that's not the first place I would look. In the new media, news is broken down into three subsets. Associated Press, New York Times, Washington Post, blogs that break stories, etc. These are our original sources. They are vital. Without these sources, there is nothing for anyone else to report. Websites like Google News, digg.com, reddit.com, Huffington Post, Yahoo, AOL News and even your local paper (they aggregate the national and international stories that they do almost no original reporting on). This is where we get a majority of our information. It's quick, it's easy, and often times, it's personalized. If you like news from a right-wing perspective, you go to Drudge. If you like news from a moderate or left-wing perspective, you go to Huffington Post. If you want it down the middle, you go to Yahoo. You want gossip, go to Perez Hilton. You want news and video from a progressive perspective, go to Crooks and Liars or Think Progress. Everyone has their niche. Everyone has an audience they serve well. Commentators that analyze the news from their (your) perspective. Fox News Channel, Keith Olbermann, Air America, Rush Limbaugh. Some blogs also fall in this category (unsurprisingly, blogs are often hybrids that cross many different boundaries). These are people that help bring the news to you in a way you agree with. They inform you, but they also excite, enrage and impassion you. Their purpose is analysis/entertainment. Some people call this category infotainment. I prefer (my former co-host) Ben Mankiewicz's name for it - entermation. So, where do traditional news anchors fit in here? Nowhere. How often do television reporters break stories these days? Almost never. Most of them are actors reading the news pretending to be real reporters. I'm amused at how other TV reporters feign outrage at Katie Couric becoming the CBS prime time news anchor. Why, do you fancy yourself a journalist? Really, when is the last time you broke a story? Most of the people on local news are former models and pretty boys with three brain cells between them. Are we supposed to be impressed? Look on TV, does it look like they are making their decisions based on looks or intelligence? Is it just a coincidence that all the pretty people wound up with the jobs on TV? I understand there are exceptions and I actually picked Brian Williams as my example because I think he is one of the exceptions. He is an awfully bright guy who gets the news. But so what? Even he doesn't bring anything to the table. There's no value added. Let me recount a recent conversation with my dad by way of example. He recently turned 70 and used to watch the evening news every single night. My mom would have to drag him away from it to get him to sit down for dinner. The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
. . . out there who want no truck with this Innernet thing. Also, some people, of any age, like to see the news footage, especially since a lot of video on the Web doesn't work, is fuzzy, etc. True, Williams, as likeable as he is, is useless. Along, of course, with Gibson and Couric. Cenk feels the same way about TV national news as I do about magazines. Who would pay actual dollars for a handful of articles when, except for those in the magazine that the magazine's Websites withholds, you can get more articles than you can possibly read free on the Web? by
Russ Wellen (58 articles, 1029 quicklinks, 66 diaries, 335 comments) on Monday, Oct 8, 2007 at 12:43:15 PM
articles on the internet on the hopper. I put my magazines there. (Were huamns able to operate their bowels without reading, at one point in human evolution? I guess so.) by
Rob Kall (952 articles, 4177 quicklinks, 374 diaries, 2087 comments [45 recommended, 3 rejected]) on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2007 at 5:18:10 AM
CNN and Faux News are just right wing opinion outlets anymore. I still can’t believe that anyone listens to Rush the college flunkout who got a 4F classification for having a pimple on his ass. MSNBC has been my news and entertainment for the last year after I watch Keith skewer Mr. Bush. I still watch NBC at 6:30 just to get their spin. My day job allows me to surf the web and write op eds for my blog and now for OpEd News. Unfortunately they block sites labeled entertainment and politics but I still get many political sites like truthout and Common Dreams aren’t blocked. Your show is blocked but I will give it a listen from home. by
Michael Chavers (53 articles, 0 quicklinks, 15 diaries, 198 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 8, 2007 at 1:49:05 PM
by
Munich (1 articles, 86 quicklinks, 14 diaries, 1125 comments [86 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 8, 2007 at 9:52:26 PM
Boy has Yahoo got it wrong in Australia. Here it aligns its self with our Channel 7 network in Aust terms it’s the most salacious of all the frontline ‘news media’. The media in Australia is more Infotainment that news. Why else are the female anchors all young and pretty? Does that make the news better? No! just more will watch. The more that watch…the more they can charge for advertising=.more profit =more influence they have to influence laws that will effect more profits. As the American Terrorist Advisor put it “Don’t be afraid of what’s on TV. If its on TV news by definition it’s novel new, rare, unusual. Be afraid of what is NOT on the news. For example how many 9/11 was there? How many killed? When was the last lime you saw an article on the 40000 people killed each year on US roads or 25000 that die of Prostate cancer each year, or the 100000's of Americans that die from smoking related diseases…….On Iraq when was the last time you saw a new article on the 1000000 civilians Iraqi killed?....That has a greater effect on security than 3000+ soldiers tragic though it is.” by
Andris (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 531 comments) on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2007 at 9:00:15 PM
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two.... Most Popular Articles
Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Authors' Articles
Odvard Egil Dyrli on web-based tutoring: online help can offer specific and effective tutoring solutions.: An article from: District Administration
by Odvard Egil Dyrli
$5.95
Number of pages: 3
Publisher: Professional Media Group LLC
5 comments
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
How would you rate this?
![]()
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
Click Here to Login (or Signup)
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)
Rothschild's Federal Reserve Must Be Abolished by Allen L Roland
Israeli Embassy Correspondence Concerning Spirit of Humanity Capture Clarifies Centuries of Conflict by Meryl Ann Butler
Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter
McKinney Relocated from Israeli Prison by Meryl Ann Butler
Dept. of State Spokesman Addresses McKinney's Capture by Meryl Ann Butler
Obama Has No Legal Authority For Afghan War by Sherwood Ross
Hypocritical Repugnicans Owe WJ Clinton an Apology by David Gray
Torture on the 4th of July by Lawrence Gist
Our Nation has a Great Deal to Learn from Phillip Butler about Morality, Law, and Torture by Lawrence Gist
Powered by Populum