Tags for This Article:

Impeachment (2980)  Congress (2697)  People (2106) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ;
Add to My Group
October 11, 2007 at 02:00:47

Whither the impeachment movement?

by Carol Wolman

http://www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

Many in the impeachment movement are suffering from burnout. It's been a long haul these past 6 ½ years, and we're all tired, impoverished by Bushonomics, discouraged by the endless war and rumors of war.  Yet we can’t stop fighting for truth and justice; the stakes are too high. The very future of life on the planet hangs in the balance.

 

We have to take stock of the current situation and decide on the best strategy. How should the impeachment movement allocate energy at this point? We need a strategy that’s focused, peaceful and legal, so as not to provoke repression, and potentially effective.

 

Here's how I see things right now.  The country is still in limbo, hasn’t yet succumbed to fascism, thanks to our efforts and the efforts of many like-minded people around the US.  The power struggle between the Bush/Cheney dictatorship and the rule of We the People under the US Constitution continues, and the outcome is far from certain.

 

The Bush/Cheney gang of criminals have apparently made several attempts recently to mount a false flag operation, or attack Iran, or both.  They are looking for an excuse to suspend the Constitution and establish martial law.  Their efforts have failed, because alert, loyal, patriotic Americans have pulled the plug. 

 

There was a lot of buzz that something would happen over Labor Day weekend. Whatever was planned was aborted by three brave airmen who leaked the story of the illegal transport of nukes.  http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/09/marine_nuclear_B52_070904w/#Scene_1

 

There's another story making the rounds- www.english.pravda.ru/opinion/feedback/20-09-2007/97410-american_spy_satellite

We know there's a struggle within the American military over whether to attack Iran.  The story goes that the group which opposes reportedly shot down a master satellite over Peru last week, a satellite which was to coordinate a nuclear attack on Iran.  The attack was thwarted.   The satellite impacted in the Andes and was reported as a meteorite, but the crater is far too large, and the people in the area appear to have radiation poisoning.  (I've been told that the source of this story, Sorcha Faal, is a disinformation agent who writes in Pravda to confuse American bloggers,  but I don't see why Bush/Cheney would want such a story put out.)

 

In any case, there's plenty of opposition to an attack on Iran, to a false flag operation, to the imposition of fascism.  The opposition is at all levels of American society, but especially among people knowledgeable about military matters.  No matter how many generals Bush/Cheney fire, the sane and savvy opponents to the B/C nutty, self-destructive policies keep interfering with their evil plots.

 

On the other hand, Congress is crawling on its belly to Bush/Cheney, for reasons we can only guess at.  It's not about pleasing the voters, that's for sure, since their cowardice is obviously having the opposite effect.  Whatever hold B/C have over Pelosi et al, it's more powerful than public opinion.

 

So what should the impeachment movement do?  We need an impeaching Congress, and we have the opposite.

 

It's been clear to me for months that our attention needs to focus on the 2008 Congressional elections.  Most of Congress needs to be replaced, starting with Pelosi.  Cindy Sheehan is challenging her and intends to win.  I'm challenging Mike Thompson in CA District 1, and encouraging Carol Brouillet to take on Anna Eshoo again.  We need a new broom coalition for a clean sweep of Congress.

The acid test is whether the Congressperson has agreed to cosponsor H Res 333, introduced by Kucinich, which seeks to impeach Cheney because he lied us into Iraq, and is threatening Iran with no provocation. The cosponsors are listed below, with dates they signed on. They deserve medals of honor for their bravery and willingness to tell the truth.

 

Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy [MO-1] - 5/1/2007

Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. [IL-9] - 5/1/2007

Rep Wynn, Albert Russell [MD-4] - 5/10/2007

Rep Clarke, Yvette D. [NY-11] - 6/6/2007

Rep Lee, Barbara [CA-9] - 6/7/2007

Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. [CA-6] - 6/7/2007

Rep Waters, Maxine [CA-35] - 6/12/2007

Rep Johnson, Henry C. "Hank," Jr. [GA-4] - 6/28/2007

Rep Ellison, Keith [MN-5] - 6/28/2007

Rep McDermott, Jim [WA-7] - 7/10/2007

Rep Moran, James P. [VA-8] - 7/10/2007

Rep Farr, Sam [CA-17] - 7/12/2007

Rep Filner, Bob [CA-51] - 7/12/2007

Rep Brady, Robert A. [PA-1] - 7/24/2007

Rep Baldwin, Tammy [WI-2] - 8/1/2007

Rep Payne, Donald M. [NJ-10] - 8/1/2007

Rep Cohen, Steve [TN-9] - 8/4/2007

Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila [TX-18] - 8/4/2007

Rep Kilpatrick, Carolyn C. [MI-13] - 9/7/2007

Rep Towns, Edolphus [NY-10] - 9/27/2007

These 20 Representatives should definitely be re-elected, along with Kucinich, if he doesn’t become president. All other incumbents should be seriously challenged by the impeachment movement.

 

This is well worth doing.  Cindy Sheehan points out that the new Congress convenes two weeks before Bush/Cheney leave office, and a determined group could impeach during that time.  Also, Bush and Cheney can be impeached after they leave office, stripped of their benefits, and made to face criminal charges. 

I believe the job now of the impeachment movement is to keep the focus on impeachment, and make it the main issue of the 2008 Congressional campaign. This can be done by finding good, viable candidates, of any party, who will challenge incumbents in both the primary and the general elections on the issue of impeachment.

As the current Congress sees that we are serious, they will get more serious about impeachment, in an effort to save their seats. The whole climate of the country will change if we can mount and coordinate a strong challenge to incumbents who are keeping impeachment off the table.

If We the People control the House of Representatives, we can block war funding no matter who is president, and no matter what the Senate makeup is. The House has the power of the purse.

If we control the House, we can block any law that weakens environmental protection, weakens regulation of food and drugs, any law which diminishes funding for education and health and public welfare. We may not be able to get our agenda done, but at least we can prevent further harm. We can start to redirect federal money to domestic priorities, and cut the military budget.

Winning the House for We the People is difficult, but not impossible. It means bypassing the two major parties, which many people want to do. Progressive Democrats and libertarian Republicans can challenge incumbents in the primaries, with Greens, other third party members, and independents following up in November. All of us can form a new broom coalition that transcends party lines, with the goal of sweeping Congress of corporate and Bush/Cheney influences and restoring it to its true function, upholding the Constitution and serving We the People.

We don’t need a majority. All we need is a bloc of votes in the House big enough to prevent either Democrats or Republicans from getting a majority. Fifty seats would be plenty. We would function as a caucus, across party lines.

There are many challenges in the months ahead: how to find each other, how to cooperate so well that we agree on suitable candidates, how to raise money without going to corporations, how to spread the word outside the mainstream media. We’ve had lots of practice over the past few years. Now is the time to use everything we have learned, and take our country back.

We have to put many differences aside and agree on a few main goals- restore the Constitution, withdraw from foreign imperialistic adventures, cooperate with other nations to slow and stop global warming- the priorities are obvious to all of us. It’s a matter of planetary survival. We have to scuttle the New World Order, which has the US acting as boss, and replace it with a council of nations acting together to solve planetary problems.

Candidates for Congress are stepping up to the plate all over the country. We need a national coordinating committee- perhaps the groups that organize the massive peace marches could take this on.

 

Meanwhile, there are many things we can do individually and with our local groups. Again, our job is to keep the focus on impeachment

 

The following suggestions come from a recent meeting of Impeach Bush Cheney.

 

1) Continue blogging, writing and researching relevant articles online, and watching the media for disinformation, or neglect of our movement.

2) Make at least two phone calls a day to Congresspeople- pester John Conyers, especially.  Thank our Congresspeople who have signed on to H Res 333.

3) Write letters to the editor.

4) Talk to everyone about the urgency of impeachment and the refusal of THIS Congress to do it, and the need to elect new faces, people who are not professional politicians and who will represent We the People, not corporate interests.

5) Talk about it with relatives, friends and neighbors, people at work.

6) Bring it up at formal groups you belong to- peace and ecology groups, labor groups, political parties.  Ask the group to pass an impeachment resolution, add impeachment to their literature, focus on it.

7) Ask your local businesses to put impeachment signs in their windows.

8) Give out buttons and bumper stickers, and wear them yourself.

9) Hold a house party- screen the DVD High Crimes, which lays out the legal basis for impeachment, with well-documented network and independent footage (email
paracove@mcn.org or go to www.paracove.com to order).  It comes with a toolkit on how to organize for impeachment.

10) Prepare a talk on impeachment and ask to speak at events.

11) Table at a farmer's market, post office, or other venue. 

12) Think about running for Congress yourself, or work with others to find and build a suitable candidate.

We can do this. The people, united, can never be defeated.

 

 

Peace, Carol Wolman

CoChair, Impeach Bush-Cheney

Green candidate for Congress CA District 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
impeach Bush and Cheney

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTowK03sr7Q

Carol S. Wolman, MD is a psychiatrist in Northern California. A lifelong peace activist, she has written extensively on the psychology of our times. She is a cochair of Bay Area Impeach Bush-Cheney. You can join or form a local group at http://impeachbush.meetup.com/ She ran for Congress in '06, and is now a Gteen candidate for Congress in CA district 1. She is a coordinator of The New Broom Coalition, for a clean sweep of Congress.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 comments

Hartford, Connecticut, lawyer, grandfather, Air Force veteran. Organizer: xdem.org
Steve FournierHartford, Connecticut, lawyer, grandfather, Air Force veteran. Organizer: xdem.org

Replacing Congress

Consider whether the entire Congress should turn over.  The few incumbents that the author has recommended for reelection are Democrats who can't bring themselves to condemn their party and its leadership for the current mess.  Give them an ultimatum: repudiate your party or face a strong, organized independent opponent next year. 

Also, consider organizing at www.xDem.org

by Steve Fournier (31 articles, 17 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 41 comments) on Thursday, October 11, 2007 at 6:45:49 AM
 


Finding a more subtle way to push the impeachment of Bush. The loud voices are preaching to the choir. We need a more subtle sign to show we are not a fringe group.
Pit BossFinding a more subtle way to push the impeachment of Bush. The loud voices are preaching to the choir. We need a more subtle sign to show we are not a fringe group.

Whithering momentum

Two reasons this is happening. One, Pelosi and the democrats who said they would do something which they didn't.

Second is the in-your-face protests on random street corners that I see.  This doesn't speak to anyone but the choir.  The movement looks like radicals.  Please no one chain themselves to a basket of peaches (you know someone has thought of it)

If people wear non offensive shirts, pins, wristbands, etc, then the message is dispayed beyond the Saturday on the corner.  Imagine if everyone who believed in this would wear something everyday.  We don't have to accost people with our views. 

I get more conversations than ever started with my wristband.  A woman I met has the same thing happening with her pin.  No one stops to listen when we have the signs.  

Start the conversation, don't beat people over the head, it doesn't work. If everyone did show their support through articles they wear, others on the fence would see that they have people around them that are like them.  Few identify with protesters.

http://inapeach.com is my site and this is how I believe we will get the movement moving again.  But we are running out of time where the fence sitters won't bother getting down.

Pit Boss 

 

by Pit Boss (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 2 comments) on Friday, October 12, 2007 at 7:02:24 PM
 


Medieval Astrologer, 21 years + experience.
Naturopathy, Homeopathy and Herbal Medicine including
Bach Flower Remedies.

Gary PriceMedieval Astrologer, 21 years + experience.
Naturopathy, Homeopathy and Herbal Medicine including
Bach Flower Remedies.

BAE Scandal-Cheney failed his mission

The Army nuke story has been taken down and the website for 'ru' says

the pravda page no longer exists..sounds like a cover up to me.

Anyway this is big news also.

please read.I am sure you will find it interesting.

BAE Scandal: Cheney Failed His Mission
Increase   Decrease

Latest Analysis:
Will BAE Scandal of Century Bring Down Cheney?

By: Jeff Steinberg


BAE Building in Arlington, VA:
Visible from Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Bridge, Route 66.

June 21, 2007 (LPAC)--With the U.S. Department of Justice now confirmed to be investigating money laundering and bribery by the British aerospace giant, BAE Systems, Congress and the American people must make certain that the investigation does not turn into one more Bush-Cheney-Gonzales coverup. The issue on the table is far bigger than the alleged $2 billion in bribes that BAE Systems paid out to former Saudi Arabian Ambassador to the United States Prince Bandar bin-Sultan, through the now defunct Washington, D.C. based Riggs Bank. As Executive Intelligence Review revealed in a stunning expose appearing in the June 22, 2007 edition ("Scandal of the Century Rocks British Crown and the City"), at least $80 billion in unaccounted for loot has been generated by the Al-Yamamah oil-for-jet fighters barter deal, since it was first signed in Sept. 1985.

While British news organizations, led by The Guardian and BBC have published revealing details of BAE bribery and slush funds, involving Prince Bandar, former Chilean dictator Gen. Augusto Pinochet, and the late Dutch Royal Consort, Prince Bernhard, none of the British media have touched upon the full magnitude of the scandal--the approximately $160 billion in secret oil revenues, generated by the BAE-Saudi Al-Yamamah deal, over the past 22 years (see accompanying chart for the year-by-year cash value of the Saudi oil shipments to BAE, through British Petroleum, Royal Dutch Shell and the British government's Defence Export Sales Organization).

British author William Simpson, who wrote the 2006 authorized biography of Prince Bandar, The Prince--The Secret Story of the World's Most Intriguing Royal, on the other hand, provided authoritative details "right from the prince's mouth" that should be of great interest to American Justice Department and Congressional investigators. What Simpson hinted at is perhaps the biggest covert Anglo-American slush fund in history --one that the author openly acknowledged had been used to fund clandestine wars, including the Afghantsi Mujahideen war against the Soviet Army in Afghanistan, and other covert military actions in Africa.

Citing his interviews with Tony Edwards, the one-time head of the British government's Defence Export Sales Organization (DESO), which administered the Al-Yamamah project, Simpson wrote:

"Edwards admitted that for the Saudis the use of oil meant that the contract was effectively an off-balance-sheet transaction: it did not go through the Saudi treasury. Edwards also confirmed that one of the main attractions for the Saudis in this unique arrangement was British flexibility. 'The British were much more flexible than the Americans,' he said. 'The Americans went through the Foreign Military sales system, which has congressional law behind it. If the customers get out of line and they fail to pay the money, then they are cut off. In this country, it was quite flexible; sometimes the oil flow and the associated monies that were received by selling it were ahead, at other times it fell behind.'"

Simpson continued, "The phenomenal amount of money generated from the sale of oil comes through DESO, before being paid to British Aerospace. Edwards admitted that the government does charge a little commission for administering the contract, money that attracted the attention of the Treasury as it built up a considerable surplus."

What neither Edwards nor Simpson chose to point out was the fact that the oil revenues generated from the 600,000 barrels per day that the Saudis paid into the Al-Yamamah fund from 1985 through to the present, amounted to an estimated $160 billion--four times the actual cost of the entire military package delivered by BAE to Saudi Arabia. Nobody in London is talking about where the rest of the money landed--and what it was used for.

DESO was established as a British government entity in the mid-1960s, and has been the private domain of Britain's main defense manufacturers and allied financial institutions, ever since. Throughout its history, the director of DESO has always been a director of a major British arms manufacturer, responsible for hawking as much business as possible for the Anglo firms.

But beyond the increase in British portion of the global arms business, DESO also aimed to secure British control over the entirety of the Western arms business, through off-balance-sheet arrangements that would be impossible to pull off under American law. Simpson revealed that, under Al-Yamamah, American and other foreign firms were also allowed to cash in on the deal:

 


Prince Bandar and Margaret Thatcher:
BAE Systems was created in 1981, when Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher privatized the British arms industry.
"The Al-Yamamah deal Mrs. Thatcher negotiated placed British Aerospace as the prime contractor for the provision of any other military equipment purchased for Saudi Arabia. 'By supporting not just the British aircraft but the American aircraft too,' said Edwards, 'Al-Yamamah was an integral part of supporting the Saudi Air Force in total.' He stressed that DESO and British Aerospace have thus ended up supporting all Saudi aircraft--the Peace Shield program--all funded through Al-Yamamah. Edwards concluded, 'In other words, the value of this stream of income and what it is used for has drifted a little bit over the years into things other than it was originally destined for.'

"In effect," Simpson admitted, "Al-Yamamah would become a backdoor method of covertly buying U.S. arms for the kingdom; military hardware purchases that would not be visible to Congress. It specifically had been structured to provide an unparalleled degree of flexibility whereby the Saudis could purchase military equipment under the imprimatur of DESO and British Aerospace."

Simpson, who wrote The Prince as virtually a ghost autobiography of the enigmatic Saudi diplomat, Prince Bandar, openly acknowledged that the sheer magnitude of the oil-for-jets deal raised serious questions of corruption.

"The ingenious diversity of Al-Yamamah," he wrote, "together with the British government's discretion and liberal approach to a unique finance deal, largely founded on the undisputed collateral of the huge Saudi oil reserves, could explain the financial black holes assumed by a suspicious media to be evidence of commissions."

But, Simpson explained, "Although Al-Yamamah constitutes a highly unconventional way of doing business, its lucrative spin-offs are the by-products of a wholly political objective: a Saudi political objective and a British political objective. Al-Yamamah is, first and foremost, a political contract. Negotiated at the height of the Cold War, its unique structure has enabled the Saudis to purchase weapons from around the globe to fund the fight against Communism. Al-Yamamah money can be found in the clandestine purchase of Russian ordnance used in the expulsion of Qadaffi's troops from Chad. It can also be traced to arms bought from Egypt and other countries, and sent to the Mujahideen in Afghanistan fighting the Soviet occupying forces."

"Arguably," Simpson admitted, "its consummate flexibility is needed because of inevitable opposition to Saudi arms purchases in Congress... The oil barter arrangement circumvented such bureaucracy."


Panavia/BAE Tornado GR4:
Military hardware, such as this Tornado fighter jet, was one the main conduits of "slushed" funds.
Simpson quoted "sources close to Bandar," who explained: "What Al-Yamamah did, because it is oil for services, is to say: Okay. Al-Yamamah picks up the tab; Saudi Arabia will sign with the French or whoever, and Britain pays them on their behalf. So suddenly the Saudis now have an operational weapons system complete with its support that doesn't reflect on Al-Yamamah as a project. Therefore, if Saudi Arabia wants some services from the Americans, or some weapons system that they have to buy now, otherwise Congress will object to it later, and they can't get it from their current defense budget, then they simply tell Al-Yamamah, 'You divert that money.'"

Between the more than $80 billion in untraced funds generated through Al-Yamamah, according to EIR's conservative estimate, corroborated by U.S. intelligence sources, and the use of the project as a cover for covert activities around the globe and unauthorized weapons purchases, both the Justice Department and the U.S. Congress have a much bigger series of crimes to probe than the $2 billion in fees allegedly conduited through the Saudi accounts at Riggs Bank. The issue is the British corruption and subversion of American law on a grand scale.

Prince Bandar's ghost writer, William Simpson, has revealed that Al-Yamamah provided off-balance-sheet covert funding for the decade-long Mujihadeen covert war to drive the Soviet Red Army out of Afghanistan. U.S . intelligence sources have independently confirmed that at least some of those funds went to the recruitment and training of foreign Muslim fighters, who were sent to Afghanistan. Some of those fighters, following the Afghan War (1979-1990) would later surface in such far-away places as Algeria, the Philippines, Indonesia, Yemen, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia as Islamist insurgents, including members of Al Qaeda.

Simpson also revealed that Al-Yamamah funds went to the purchase of Soviet-made weapons, that were provided to Chad, to drive Libyan forces out of that African country. John Bedenkamp, a onetime top aide to Rhodesia's apartheid-era President Ian Smith, and a major arms broker throughout Africa, is currently under investigation by Britain's Serious Fraud Office (SFO) for his role in BAE arms dealings in South Africa. U.S. intelligence sources have identified Bedenkamp as a conduit for Soviet arms into African insurgents, raising questions about his earlier involvement with the Al-Yamamah project in these weapons deals fueling wars in Africa.

Cheney On The Hot Seat

Washington sources have reported to EIR that the Al-Yamamah revelations have sent shock-waves through the City of London. According to one senior U.S. intelligence source, who spoke to EIR on condition of anonymity, "the Al-Yamamah story opens a window into the inner world of Anglo-Dutch financial power. While Al-Yamamah is not the only such off-budget arrangement, it is one of the largest, and it provides a clear picture of a mode of operation--totally outside the control of any government agency, especially the U.S. government. Ultimately, this is a London scandal, not a Riyad scandal."

One consequence of those shock waves is that Vice President Dick Cheney, according to knowledgeable Washington insiders, is in deep trouble with his London friends. Cheney, the sources report, was the guarantor that the story of the $80-100 billion dollar fund would never see the light of day. And, while the American and British establishment press have attempted to bury the scandal, either through blacking it our altogether, or focusing attention on tertiary features, like the relatively small flow of cash into Prince Bandar, the EIR revelations have saturated the U.S. Congress and have been picked up around the world.

The next chapter is now being written in the scandal of the century, and that could mean the political doom of Dick Cheney. Ironically, it could come at the hands of his own political boosters in the City of London, rather than from Congressional Democrats, who remain divided on the issue of Cheney's impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors. Ultimately, the real powers behind the throne in London have very low tolerance for failure.

This Dossier

 

by Gary Price (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 14 comments) on Friday, October 12, 2007 at 9:12:54 PM
 


Mail carrier who drives the rest of my colleagues nuts with my politics.
ScottMail carrier who drives the rest of my colleagues nuts with my politics.

Larouche, huh?

That always makes me laugh when people use this convicted fraud as a source for anything.

by Scott (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 394 comments) on Sunday, October 14, 2007 at 10:55:11 PM
 


Mail carrier who drives the rest of my colleagues nuts with my politics.
ScottMail carrier who drives the rest of my colleagues nuts with my politics.

Here's the other funny part

It's such a hoot, reading about how all these false-flag operations have been in the works - and then when they don't happen, the barking moonbat left claims credit for exposing them and thereby shutting them down. That reminds me of one religious nut back in 1999 who said God told him personally that the Y2K bug was going to destroy the world. When it didn't happen, the nut still insisted that God would destroy the world with Y2k; He just wouldn't destroy it on January 1st.

Laughing at lunacy is a better reaction then getting ticked off over it.

by Scott (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 394 comments) on Monday, October 15, 2007 at 9:46:13 PM
 

 

5 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

 

 

 

 

24 hrs 48 hrs
72 hrs 1 week
1 month 6 months
1 year All Time
Articles
Diaries Members
Products Events
Polls  
  

Articles Popularity:

GOP whistleblower names Karl Rove in Ohio's 04 election theft
by steveheller

Epilepsy Study Incriminates Aspartame in Medications
by Dr. GLEN MABSON, Phd. Epileptic Foundation of Maui dba Pacific Epilepsy Society

Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Workers vs Exxon
by Merle Savage

Fox-Owned National Geographic Uses Gorillas as Cover for Exploitation of Congo
by Georgianne Nienaber

The "Ownership Society"
by Mike Malloy

The Great Depression of 2008
by Marc McDonald

Dalai Lama: "I Love President Bush... but... Lack(s) Understanding of Reality"
by Rob Kall

Federal Judge Ruling: George W. Bush is a Felon
by Len Hart

Nine Republicans Break Party Ranks: Send Impeachment Article to Judiciary for Hearings
by Ralph Lopez

Australia Only Nation Comprehending Beijing Smog Medical Damage; Skipping Opening Ceremony August 8!
by Stephen Fox