Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ;
Add to My Group
February 17, 2007 at 10:36:26

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Why the resistance to 9-11 truth?

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Carol Wolman (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Carol Wolman - Writer

Anyone who has studied 9-11 at all knows it was an inside job.

Bush was not surprised. His brother Marvin's security company closed down one tower the week before and brought in lots of cables and other equipment. The towers, including building 7, were dropped by controlled demolition. The planes provided a dramatic cover story- great pix.

Rumsfeld had control of scrambling planes transferred to himself, exclusively, a few months before, and then disappeared that morning, so no planes intercepted the four hijacked airliners. Instead, there was a "stand-down" of NORAD. By some strange coincidence, a military exercise was being run that am which simulated planes crashing into buildings, so that the air traffic controllers were confused about whether the "attack" was real or part of a drill.


The buildings were pulverized, but the passports of the hijackers were miraculously thrown clear and quickly "discovered". There was no investigation, only a coverup that blamed the CIA and recommended police state measures to prevent future "attacks".

Then there's the lack of plane parts and small hole at the Pentagon. The flying out of the Bin Laden family the next day. The millions made on selling airline stocks short by those in the know. The confusion about passenger lists. The rejection of FBI reports about possible terrorists at US flying schools. And on and on.

There are so many videos that its hard to choose, but my favorites is 9-11 Mysteries at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003 If you are not certain that 9-11 was an inside job, please watch this video. It's 1 1/2 hours of factual material that will convince you. You owe it to yourself and all the rest of us to learn the truth about 9-11.

Most Americans, even those who are working for peace and impeachment, are reluctant to believe that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the rest actually planned and implemented 9-11, even though their long range plan (PNAC) clearly states that they need "a new Pearl Harbor". The Reichstag fire is a better parallel, since it was also an inside job.

Polls show widespread skepticism of the cover story, and suspicion that Bush allowed 9-11 to happen, ignoring warnings from abroad and from his own intelligence service. But to think that he actually helped plan it, that demolition charges were set in the Towers by his brother's company- that is a depth of evil that most of us can't even begin to contemplate.

Why is this? Why, when we all know so well what liars and connivers the Bush people are, how little they care for human life, or truth, or honor, how greedy they are for power and how ruthless they are in pursuing it, why is it so hard to believe that they planned and carried out 9-11?

The degree of denial is astounding.

The cover story is paper thin. Osama was blamed within 24 hours, with no investigation. It's obvious that the 9-11 Commission asked the wrong question,- not whodunit, but why were the signals missed? It's obvious that Osama, no matter how bright and charismatic, could not have orchestrated such a massive attack from caves in Afghanistan. It's obvious that the Saudi hijackers, if that's who they were, were allowed into this country with no screening, allowed to take flight lessons, allowed to get on airplanes with box cutters- but how could all this be known, when the twin towers were pulverized? Etc. etc.

When denial is so strong, it's because people don't want to know the truth. The implications are too overwhelming, too frightening. Facing the truth about 9-11, that it was an inside job, planned and carried out with the help of the Bush family and administration, means facing the fact that we are saddled with a monster, a satanic creature, that will stop at nothing to gain total power.

It means facing what fools we are, what cowards we are, not to call a spade a spade.

It means seeing through the pious cloak of false Christianity and false patriotism that Bush has assumed.

It means facing the terrible danger we are in, of losing every ounce of precious freedom our forefathers fought so hard to obtain, and that we so take for granted.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
impeach Bush and Cheney

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Carol S. Wolman, MD is a psychiatrist in Northern California. A lifelong peace activist, she is helping to distribute a Peace Plan for the Holy Land- email her for a copy. As the Green candidate for Congress in California District 1 in '08, she (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "9 11 Truth"
The American Truth
by Nick Shelton

$14.99
Lowest New Price $13.38

Number of pages: 224
Publisher: Mill City Press

The Greatest Story Ever Sold: The Decline and Fall of Truth from 9/11 to Katrina
by Frank Rich

$25.95
Lowest New Price $3.50

Number of pages: 352
Publisher: Penguin Press HC, The

9/11 The Ultimate Truth
by Laura Knight-Jadczyk

$44.99

Number of pages: 430
Publisher: Red Pill Press

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
107 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

middle management by richard on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 11:33:54 AM
not convinced by francine on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 1:26:32 PM
Overwhelming evidence; you're just not looking at it. by johndoraemi on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 8:33:59 PM
Proof by PrMaine on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 8:39:57 AM
lihop, mihop, evidence..... by richard on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 2:46:02 PM
Wonderful piece Carol!! by Styve on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 2:51:50 PM
The Masses by "Hoss" David P. on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 2:56:52 PM
Operation Mockingbird by richard on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 4:55:49 PM
9/11 Truth is the way to set us Free by Sleeper on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 3:45:15 PM
The Little Conspiracies That Could by David Glenn Cox on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 5:05:02 PM
Not a good strategy... by francine on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 5:31:30 PM
Musical and Cognitive Dissonance by CasaZaza on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 8:22:31 PM
Need a lot more links and facts. by Steven Leser on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 6:31:21 PM
I'd like to see some "engineering proof". by jpsmith123 on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 8:12:35 PM
Is that distant drumming I here? by ardee D. on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 10:30:40 AM
ROTFL! by jpsmith123 on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:50:56 AM
Stay calm laddy by ardee D. on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 6:11:24 PM
Does your Mommy know you're at the computer again? by jpsmith123 on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 5:26:29 PM
Do you really believe by ardee D. on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 6:00:47 PM
Apparently you're looking in the mirror as you type. by jpsmith123 on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 7:06:24 PM
You are a proven idiot by ardee D. on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 6:45:48 PM
ROTFL! by jpsmith123 on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:53:42 AM
Maybe by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 1:04:54 PM
Maybe, still, it is weird, dontcha think? by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 8:02:51 AM
--IF-- by johndoraemi on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 8:42:02 PM
Conspiracy nuts versus wingnuts? by francine on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 7:22:26 AM
Debunking Francine by richard on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:58:27 AM
Excellent job, Medicis!! by Styve on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 3:43:17 PM
What it Will Take by "Hoss" David P. on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 7:55:03 AM
9/11, Bush by Bob Gormley on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 10:24:48 AM
The Religion Of Television by JacksonHolly on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 1:06:00 PM
Engineering Proof by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 1:10:15 PM
Sorry, the intended link was... by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 2:34:55 PM
There is also this by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 1:19:54 PM
What "Engineering Proof" are you talking about? by jpsmith123 on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 2:25:23 PM
Both links I reference the engineering work of an NIST Civil by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 2:47:36 PM
Dr. Sunder provides a *theory*, not a proof. by jpsmith123 on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 4:39:56 PM
Where are the citations for what you say? by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 5:04:04 PM
The simple physics involved here is self-evident. by jpsmith123 on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 6:01:43 PM
I actually took both High school and several semesters of by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 10:43:24 PM
Then you should get your money back. by jpsmith123 on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 5:28:12 AM
No, I shouldn't, YOU should stick to your field by Steven Leser on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 9:34:55 AM
Now you're just being contrary. by jpsmith123 on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 4:51:07 PM
Fluff or science? by richard on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 2:19:04 PM
Made up data? by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 2:25:04 PM
The reports I cited both reference a licensed civil engineer by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 2:44:21 PM
Sources.... by richard on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:48:28 PM
After all of this worthless reposting, you still have no by Steven Leser on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 9:36:58 AM
I'm delighted with the discussion, but... by Carol Wolman on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 3:23:16 PM
Where are the citations for what you say? by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 4:14:03 PM
I'm not the one making the extraordinary claims. by jpsmith123 on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 5:05:33 PM
You are still not getting it. You need sources by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 5:13:04 PM
Here is the complete analysis of the steel by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 5:43:27 PM
I don't see anything in there that supports Sunder's theory. by jpsmith123 on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 7:12:25 PM
YOUR OWN EVIDENCE BETRAYS YOU. by johndoraemi on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 3:37:18 AM
No, it doesn't by Steven Leser on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 9:54:07 AM
Number 12 is carefully crafted to avoid truth by Sleeper on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 8:17:24 PM
Its the 10 seconds by Sleeper on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 6:08:13 PM
Physics by Maxwell on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 9:18:09 PM
Who supports your theory who has expertise in this field? by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:02:47 PM
Hypothesis by Maxwell on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 9:44:30 AM
Shipfitter Experience by Mac McKinney on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 9:54:43 PM
You people are nitpickers by Carol Wolman on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 10:34:20 PM
Nitpickers?!?! by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 10:55:17 PM
yes, nitpickers by Carol Wolman on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:43:07 PM
Engineers Are NOT Perfect Beings by Mac McKinney on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:18:52 AM
nitpicking is avoiding by Carol Wolman on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 9:36:16 AM
I read your links and many others by Steven Leser on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 9:44:11 AM
Why? by Geraldo on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:17:40 PM
Reality?!?! by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 2:00:07 PM
Fond farewell to the Spoiler-in-chief? by Geraldo on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 7:13:31 AM
Conspiracy obfuscating the conspiracy of the conspiracy? by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 2:06:51 PM
Leser by amazin on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 8:54:30 AM
Leser by amazin on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 8:59:22 AM
Flagged by amazin on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 9:06:21 AM
Limiting comment on your article by amazin on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 9:52:12 AM
What is it you are accusing me of now? by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 2:12:02 PM
What is it you are accusing me of now? by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 2:12:08 PM
Yes. Yes. by amazin on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 1:52:13 AM
The Last Word? by Maxwell on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:35:06 PM
My title question remains by Carol Wolman on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:35:32 PM
Nit - what? - who? by amazin on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 1:21:28 PM
Test by Maxwell on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 8:47:37 PM
Test by Maxwell on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 8:48:48 PM
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury - by amazin on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 9:49:03 AM
Please someone comment on the content of the essay! by Carol Wolman on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:05:49 PM
How to engage the public on this? by Maxwell on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:04:08 PM
How to engage the public on this? by Carol Wolman on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:53:38 AM
test position by Rob Kall on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 3:42:07 AM
this by amazin on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 4:08:19 AM
The real reason behind 9-11 by Gill S. Pee on Friday, May 4, 2007 at 9:31:18 AM
Thanks, Carol. by Maturin42 on Friday, May 4, 2007 at 11:24:28 AM
Cheney, not Rumsfeld by jemonk on Friday, May 11, 2007 at 1:23:25 PM
Yes, a Real Investigation Is in Order by Mac McKinney on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:05:48 PM
Give it a rest Lesor...you are resorting to... by Styve on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 2:24:30 PM
... oh yes, you told me... by Steven Leser on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 4:45:10 PM
Styve by amazin on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 10:21:08 AM
Re: Styve by Maxwell on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 8:50:42 PM
Re Re Styve by Maxwell on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 8:54:46 PM
this by amazin on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 1:39:59 AM
Hey Amazin'...didn't follow this today... by Styve on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 1:57:52 AM
Styve by amazin on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 4:29:27 AM
Thanks for the encouraging words by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 8:08:04 AM
Really - by amazin on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 9:21:15 AM
Really - by amazin on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 9:21:37 AM
Thanks for the response Amazin'! by Styve on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 4:42:57 PM
You and amazin are quite the pre-pubescent pair by Steven Leser on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:35:51 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum